Tearlach's Gabriel Project, Nevada, Lithium Re-assays Higher than Original

Original announcement by tmx on

Company
Tearlach Resources Limited
Ticker
TEA
Exchange
TSX
Region
Nevada
Primary commodity
Lithium
Secondary commodities
None reported
Document categories
Drill results
Extracted
2026-09-13 03:06:56 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Tearlach Resources reported pulp re-assay results for six TN22 drill holes at the Gabriel Project in Nevada, showing lithium grades 14-33% higher than original assays. The results include intercepts up to 1,660 ppm lithium and expand the defined mineralization zone to the southwest.

Reasoning: The re-assay program significantly improved the grade profile of previously drilled holes, enhancing the value of the existing drill database and expanding the known footprint.

Positive factors

  • Re-assay results are 14-33% higher than original assays
  • Expands defined mineralization to the southwest
  • High individual grade of 1,660 ppm lithium

Negative factors

  • TN22-015 did not intersect minimum cut-off

Facts used in scoring: 5

Classification and evidence

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: Release mentions re-assaying pulps at ALS Laboratory Reno NV and refers to a Qualified Person review.

Evidence · text

“The original pulps were also re-assayed at the ALS Laboratory Reno NV”

Step-Out Extensionpositive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Why it applies: The re-assay data expands the defined mineralization to the southwest.

Evidence · text

“Expands Tearlach defined mineralization to the southwest.”

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 5. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (5)

TN22-011Gabriel · lithiumGrade Unit: ppmIntercept: 39.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TN22-011
Project
Gabriel
Commodity
lithium
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
TEA

Geometry

Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
39.6 m
Hole Depth
154 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2022-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2023-06-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Significant length reported in a re-assay context.

Positive factors

  • Longest intercept of 39.6m

Evidence · text

“Longest intercept of lithium mineralization for the six (6) holes is 130 feet (39.6m): Hole TN22-011”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Final Frontier is located adjacent to and near Frontier Lithium’s PAK lithium deposit north of Red Lake."

TN22-012Gabriel · lithiumGrade: 836Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 21.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TN22-012
Project
Gabriel
Commodity
lithium
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
TEA

Geometry

Grade
836
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
21.3 m
Hole Depth
12.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2022-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2023-06-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Strong grade and width for a re-assay.

Positive factors

  • Highest primary intercept grade

Evidence · text

“Highest primary intercept grade is 836 ppm Li over 70 feet (21.3m): Hole – TN22-012”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Final Frontier is located adjacent to and near Frontier Lithium’s PAK lithium deposit north of Red Lake."

TN22-012Gabriel · lithiumGrade: 984Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 12.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TN22-012
Project
Gabriel
Commodity
lithium
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
TEA

Geometry

Grade
984
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
12.2 m
Hole Depth
12.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2022-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2023-06-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: High grade intercept within the hole.

Positive factors

  • High grade sub-interval

Evidence · text

“Highest grade for an “Included intercept” is 984 ppm Li over 40 feet (12.2m), including 1,660 ppm: Hole TN22-012”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Final Frontier is located adjacent to and near Frontier Lithium’s PAK lithium deposit north of Red Lake."

TN22-012Gabriel · lithiumGrade: 1660Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TN22-012
Project
Gabriel
Commodity
lithium
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
TEA

Geometry

Grade
1660
Grade Unit
ppm
Hole Depth
12.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2022-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2023-06-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Very high grade lithium value.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional grade

Evidence · text

“including 1,660 ppm: Hole TN22-012”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Final Frontier is located adjacent to and near Frontier Lithium’s PAK lithium deposit north of Red Lake."

TN22-013Gabriel · lithiumGrade: 559Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 16.764 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TN22-013
Project
Gabriel
Commodity
lithium
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
TEA

Geometry

Grade
559
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
16.764 m
Hole Depth
8.3 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2022-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2023-06-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Solid intercept confirming mineralization.

Positive factors

  • High individual value of 1,100 ppm

Evidence · text

“intersected 55 feet of lithium mineralization, grading 559 ppm (highest individual value at 1,100 ppm)”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Final Frontier is located adjacent to and near Frontier Lithium’s PAK lithium deposit north of Red Lake."

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.