# Temas and SAGA Successfully Validate RCL Technology With Titanium Recoveries of Up to 90.8% and Vanadium Recoveries of 97.4%

Canonical Atlas analysis: https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/temas-and-saga-successfully-validate-rcl-technology-with-titanium-recoveries-of--95111b0f-7342-4631-810c-c70ee5358f8b

Original source: https://finance.yahoo.com/energy/articles/temas-saga-successfully-validate-rcl-110000049.html

Publisher: yahoo\_press

Original announcement: 2026-07-30T11:00:00.000Z

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published: Unknown date

Atlas analysis updated: Unknown date

- Company: SAGA Metals

- Ticker: SAGA

- Exchange: TSXV

- Region: Unavailable

- Primary commodity: Titanium

- Secondary commodities: Vanadium

- Document categories: Metallurgy

- Extracted: 2026-09-19 12:11:35 UTC

Narrative sentiment: 1.00 · Bullish

## Minestarters Atlas summary

Temas Resources Corp. and SAGA Metals have successfully validated Temas' proprietary RCL technology during Stage 1 testing. The validation demonstrated high recoveries of up to 90.8% for titanium and 97.4% for vanadium.

Reasoning: The announcement reports successful Stage 1 validation of proprietary RCL technology with high recoveries for both titanium and vanadium, representing a significant technical milestone for the project.

- Positive factor: High titanium recovery \(90.8%\)

- Positive factor: High vanadium recovery \(97.4%\)

- Positive factor: Successful validation of proprietary RCL technology

Facts used in scoring: 2

## Classification and evidence

**High Recovery**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Recovery at or above the exceptional band for the commodity and processing route.

Why it applies: Titanium recovery of 90.8% and vanadium recovery of 97.4% are exceptionally high.

Evidence · text

> Titanium Recoveries of Up to 90.8% and Vanadium Recoveries of 97.4%

**Single Domain Only**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Testing limited to one composite or domain — representativeness not established.

Why it applies: only one composite was tested

## Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 2. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

## Metallurgical Results (2)

### Fact 1

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/temas-and-saga-successfully-validate-rcl-technology-with-titanium-recoveries-of--95111b0f-7342-4631-810c-c70ee5358f8b#fact-metallurgical-facts-0)

Radar Critical Minerals · titanium

#### Identity

- Project: Radar Critical Minerals
- Commodity: titanium
- Ticker: SAGA

#### Test Work

- Program Status: preliminary
- Sample: Stage 1 Validation of RCL Technology

#### Recovery

- Recovery: 90.8 %
- Recovery Basis: unspecified

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-07-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Reported titanium recovery of 90.8% is a significant technical validation.

- Positive factor: 90.8% recovery is a strong technical result

Evidence · text

> Titanium Recoveries of Up to 90.8%

### Fact 2

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/temas-and-saga-successfully-validate-rcl-technology-with-titanium-recoveries-of--95111b0f-7342-4631-810c-c70ee5358f8b#fact-metallurgical-facts-1)

Radar Critical Minerals · vanadium

#### Identity

- Project: Radar Critical Minerals
- Commodity: vanadium
- Ticker: SAGA

#### Test Work

- Program Status: preliminary
- Sample: Stage 1 Validation of RCL Technology

#### Recovery

- Recovery: 97.4 %
- Recovery Basis: unspecified

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-07-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Reported vanadium recovery of 97.4% is a significant technical validation.

- Positive factor: 97.4% recovery is an exceptional technical result

Evidence · text

> Vanadium Recoveries of 97.4%

## How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.