TERRA BALCANICA DRILLS 102 G/T AG EQ OVER 2.55 M AT CUMAVICI RIDGE AND EXTEND MINERALIZED FOOTPRINT IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA

Original announcement by yahoo_press on

Company
Terra Balcanica Resources Corp.
Ticker
TERA
Exchange
CSE
Region
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Primary commodity
Silver
Secondary commodities
None reported
Document categories
Drill results
Extracted
2026-09-20 18:22:17 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Terra Balcanica Resources Corp. reported high-grade silver equivalent drill results from its Cumavici Ridge epithermal vein zone in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Drillhole CMV25001 intersected 102 g/t Ag Eq over 2.55 m, extending the known mineralized footprint.

Reasoning: The drillhole CMV25001 returned a high-grade silver equivalent intercept of 102 g/t Ag Eq over 2.55 m, which is significant for an epithermal vein system.

Positive factors

  • High-grade silver equivalent intercept
  • Extension of mineralized footprint

Facts used in scoring: 2

Classification and evidence

Bonanza Interceptpositive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Why it applies: 102 g/t Ag Eq is a high-grade intercept for an epithermal silver system.

Evidence · text

“102 g/t Ag Eq. over 2.55 m”

Step-Out Extensionpositive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Why it applies: The release explicitly states the results extend the mineralized footprint.

Evidence · text

“EXTEND MINERALIZED FOOTPRINT”

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 2. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (2)

CMV25001Viogor-Zanik · silverGrade: 102Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.55 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CMV25001
Project
Viogor-Zanik
Commodity
silver
Region
bosnia and herzegovina
Reported Region
bosnia and herzegovina
Ticker
TERA

Geometry

Grade
102
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.55 m
From
66 m
To
68.55 m
Intercept Depth
66 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CMV25001:66-68.55
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Cumavici Ridge
Loc. Source
document

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: High-grade intercept of 102 g/t Ag Eq.

Positive factors

  • High-grade silver equivalent intercept

Evidence · text

“CMV25001 intersected 102g/t Ag Eq. over 2.55 m”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

CMV25001Viogor-Zanik · silverGrade: 64Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CMV25001
Project
Viogor-Zanik
Commodity
silver
Region
bosnia and herzegovina
Reported Region
bosnia and herzegovina
Ticker
TERA

Geometry

Grade
64
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.7 m
From
66 m
To
70.7 m
Intercept Depth
66 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CMV25001:66-70.7
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Cumavici Ridge
Loc. Source
document

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-01-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Broader zone of 64 g/t Ag Eq over 4.7 m.

Positive factors

  • Broader mineralized zone

Evidence · text

“64 g/t Ag Eq. over 4.7 m from 66m”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.