TinOne Drills 14 Metres of 1.03% Tin Within a Near-Surface Intercept of 29 Metres of 0.71% at Its Great Pyramid Project, Tasmania
Original announcement by tmx on
- Company
- TinOne Resources Inc.
- Ticker
- TORC
- Exchange
- TSX
- Region
- Tasmania, Australia
- Primary commodity
- Tin
- Secondary commodities
- None reported
- Document categories
- Drill results, Resource update
- Extracted
- 2026-09-17 03:36:30 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
TinOne Resources announced successful confirmatory RC drill results at its Great Pyramid Tin Project in Tasmania, Australia. The program intersected high-grade, near-surface tin mineralization, with several holes returning significantly higher grades than historical drilling, including 29 metres of 0.71% tin and 14 metres of 1.03% tin. The company also restated its 2023 Inferred Mineral Resource Estimate of 8.39 Mt at 0.17% tin, which is compliant with NI 43-101.
Reasoning: The company announced strong drill results confirming and improving upon historical tin grades at its Great Pyramid project, indicating potential for higher tin values. The document also restates a 2023 Inferred Mineral Resource Estimate.
Positive factors
- High-grade, near-surface tin intercepts
- New drilling returned higher grades than historical
- Successful confirmatory program
- NI 43-101 compliant MRE
Negative factors
- True widths of drill intercepts are uncertain
- MRE is entirely Inferred and from 2023
Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.
Facts used in scoring: 18
Classification and evidence
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: A current resource fact retains the disclosed cut-off grade
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 18. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (17)
24GPRC025Great Pyramid · tinGrade: 0.29Grade Unit: %Intercept: 24 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24GPRC025
- Project
- Great Pyramid
- Commodity
- tin
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- TORC
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.29
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 24 m
- From
- 7 m
- To
- 31 m
- Intercept Depth
- 7 m
Classification
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 24GPRC025:7-31
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Limited
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.1
- Cutoff Unit
- % Sn
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 4 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2024-10-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept confirms tin mineralization, bottoming in mineralization, but the grade is moderate and true width is uncertain.
Positive factors
- Confirmatory drilling
- Bottomed in mineralization
Negative factors
- Grade is moderate for tin
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“0.29”
Context: 24.0
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: The document explicitly states that all intersections are downhole widths and true widths are uncertain.
Evidence · text
“All intersections are downhole widths, true widths are uncertain.”
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: The drill program included 'Confirmatory drilling' which is a form of infill drilling.
Evidence · text
“Confirmatory drilling”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: The release details QA/QC procedures including certified labs, standards, duplicates, and blanks.
Evidence · text
“Control samples comprising certified reference samples, duplicates and blank samples were systematically inserted into the sample stream and analyzed as part of the Company's quality assurance / quality control protocol.”
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: The cut-off grade of 0.1% Sn with maximum consecutive internal waste of 4 metres is clearly stated for compositing.
Evidence · text
“All intersections are calculated with a cut-off grade of 0.1% Sn with maximum consecutive internal waste of 4 metres.”
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "TinOne Drills 14 Metres of 1.03% Tin Within a Near-Surface Intercept of 29 Metres of 0.71% at Its Great Pyramid Project,"
24GPRC025Great Pyramid · tinGrade: 0.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24GPRC025
- Project
- Great Pyramid
- Commodity
- tin
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- TORC
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.5
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 8 m
- To
- 14 m
- Intercept Depth
- 8 m
Classification
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 24GPRC025:8-14
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Limited
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.1
- Cutoff Unit
- % Sn
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 4 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2024-10-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This included intercept shows a moderate tin grade, contributing to the overall mineralization, but true width is uncertain.
Positive factors
- Confirmatory drilling
- Grade is moderate for tin
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“0.50”
Context: 6.0
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: The document explicitly states that all intersections are downhole widths and true widths are uncertain.
Evidence · text
“All intersections are downhole widths, true widths are uncertain.”
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: The drill program included 'Confirmatory drilling' which is a form of infill drilling.
Evidence · text
“Confirmatory drilling”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: The release details QA/QC procedures including certified labs, standards, duplicates, and blanks.
Evidence · text
“Control samples comprising certified reference samples, duplicates and blank samples were systematically inserted into the sample stream and analyzed as part of the Company's quality assurance / quality control protocol.”
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: The cut-off grade of 0.1% Sn with maximum consecutive internal waste of 4 metres is clearly stated for compositing.
Evidence · text
“All intersections are calculated with a cut-off grade of 0.1% Sn with maximum consecutive internal waste of 4 metres.”
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "TinOne Drills 14 Metres of 1.03% Tin Within a Near-Surface Intercept of 29 Metres of 0.71% at Its Great Pyramid Project,"
24GPRC025Great Pyramid · tinGrade: 0.59Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24GPRC025
- Project
- Great Pyramid
- Commodity
- tin
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- TORC
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.59
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 28 m
- To
- 31 m
- Intercept Depth
- 28 m
Classification
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 24GPRC025:28-31
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Limited
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.1
- Cutoff Unit
- % Sn
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 4 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2024-10-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This included intercept shows a moderate tin grade, contributing to the overall mineralization, but true width is uncertain.
Positive factors
- Confirmatory drilling
- Grade is moderate for tin
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“0.59”
Context: 3.0
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: The document explicitly states that all intersections are downhole widths and true widths are uncertain.
Evidence · text
“All intersections are downhole widths, true widths are uncertain.”
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: The drill program included 'Confirmatory drilling' which is a form of infill drilling.
Evidence · text
“Confirmatory drilling”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: The release details QA/QC procedures including certified labs, standards, duplicates, and blanks.
Evidence · text
“Control samples comprising certified reference samples, duplicates and blank samples were systematically inserted into the sample stream and analyzed as part of the Company's quality assurance / quality control protocol.”
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: The cut-off grade of 0.1% Sn with maximum consecutive internal waste of 4 metres is clearly stated for compositing.
Evidence · text
“All intersections are calculated with a cut-off grade of 0.1% Sn with maximum consecutive internal waste of 4 metres.”
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "TinOne Drills 14 Metres of 1.03% Tin Within a Near-Surface Intercept of 29 Metres of 0.71% at Its Great Pyramid Project,"
24GPRC026Great Pyramid · tinGrade: 0.71Grade Unit: %Intercept: 29 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24GPRC026
- Project
- Great Pyramid
- Commodity
- tin
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- TORC
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.71
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 29 m
- From
- 2 m
- To
- 31 m
- Intercept Depth
- 2 m
Classification
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 24GPRC026:2-31
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Limited
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.1
- Cutoff Unit
- % Sn
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 4 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2024-10-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a strong, near-surface tin intercept, confirming mineralization and bottoming in it, but true width is uncertain.
Positive factors
- High-grade for tin
- Near-surface
- Confirmatory drilling
- Bottomed in mineralization
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“0.71”
Context: 29.0
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: The document explicitly states that all intersections are downhole widths and true widths are uncertain.
Evidence · text
“All intersections are downhole widths, true widths are uncertain.”
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: The drill program included 'Confirmatory drilling' which is a form of infill drilling.
Evidence · text
“Confirmatory drilling”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: The release details QA/QC procedures including certified labs, standards, duplicates, and blanks.
Evidence · text
“Control samples comprising certified reference samples, duplicates and blank samples were systematically inserted into the sample stream and analyzed as part of the Company's quality assurance / quality control protocol.”
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: The cut-off grade of 0.1% Sn with maximum consecutive internal waste of 4 metres is clearly stated for compositing.
Evidence · text
“All intersections are calculated with a cut-off grade of 0.1% Sn with maximum consecutive internal waste of 4 metres.”
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "TinOne Drills 14 Metres of 1.03% Tin Within a Near-Surface Intercept of 29 Metres of 0.71% at Its Great Pyramid Project,"
24GPRC026Great Pyramid · tinGrade: 1.03Grade Unit: %Intercept: 14 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24GPRC026
- Project
- Great Pyramid
- Commodity
- tin
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- TORC
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.03
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 14 m
- From
- 14 m
- To
- 28 m
- Intercept Depth
- 14 m
Classification
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 24GPRC026:14-28
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Limited
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.1
- Cutoff Unit
- % Sn
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 4 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2024-10-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This included intercept shows a strong tin grade over a good width, contributing significantly to the overall mineralization, but true width is uncertain.
Positive factors
- Strong grade for tin
- Near-surface
- Confirmatory drilling
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“1.03”
Context: 14.0
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: The document explicitly states that all intersections are downhole widths and true widths are uncertain.
Evidence · text
“All intersections are downhole widths, true widths are uncertain.”
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: The drill program included 'Confirmatory drilling' which is a form of infill drilling.
Evidence · text
“Confirmatory drilling”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: The release details QA/QC procedures including certified labs, standards, duplicates, and blanks.
Evidence · text
“Control samples comprising certified reference samples, duplicates and blank samples were systematically inserted into the sample stream and analyzed as part of the Company's quality assurance / quality control protocol.”
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: The cut-off grade of 0.1% Sn with maximum consecutive internal waste of 4 metres is clearly stated for compositing.
Evidence · text
“All intersections are calculated with a cut-off grade of 0.1% Sn with maximum consecutive internal waste of 4 metres.”
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "TinOne Drills 14 Metres of 1.03% Tin Within a Near-Surface Intercept of 29 Metres of 0.71% at Its Great Pyramid Project,"
24GPRC027Great Pyramid · tinGrade: 0.52Grade Unit: %Intercept: 28 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24GPRC027
- Project
- Great Pyramid
- Commodity
- tin
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- TORC
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.52
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 28 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 28 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 24GPRC027:0-28
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Limited
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.1
- Cutoff Unit
- % Sn
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 4 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2024-10-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This near-surface intercept shows moderate tin grade, and is noted to have returned approximately 70% higher tin grades than historical drilling, but true width is uncertain.
Positive factors
- Near-surface
- Confirmatory drilling
- Higher grades than historical
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“0.52”
Context: 28.0
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: The document explicitly states that all intersections are downhole widths and true widths are uncertain.
Evidence · text
“All intersections are downhole widths, true widths are uncertain.”
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: The drill program included 'Confirmatory drilling' which is a form of infill drilling.
Evidence · text
“Confirmatory drilling”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: The release details QA/QC procedures including certified labs, standards, duplicates, and blanks.
Evidence · text
“Control samples comprising certified reference samples, duplicates and blank samples were systematically inserted into the sample stream and analyzed as part of the Company's quality assurance / quality control protocol.”
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: The cut-off grade of 0.1% Sn with maximum consecutive internal waste of 4 metres is clearly stated for compositing.
Evidence · text
“All intersections are calculated with a cut-off grade of 0.1% Sn with maximum consecutive internal waste of 4 metres.”
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "TinOne Drills 14 Metres of 1.03% Tin Within a Near-Surface Intercept of 29 Metres of 0.71% at Its Great Pyramid Project,"
24GPRC027Great Pyramid · tinGrade: 0.95Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24GPRC027
- Project
- Great Pyramid
- Commodity
- tin
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- TORC
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.95
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 24GPRC027:0-4
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Limited
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.1
- Cutoff Unit
- % Sn
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 4 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2024-10-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This included intercept shows a good tin grade at surface, contributing to the overall mineralization, and is noted to have returned approximately 70% higher tin grades than historical drilling, but true width is uncertain.
Positive factors
- Near-surface
- Confirmatory drilling
- Higher grades than historical
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“0.95”
Context: 4.0
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: The document explicitly states that all intersections are downhole widths and true widths are uncertain.
Evidence · text
“All intersections are downhole widths, true widths are uncertain.”
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: The drill program included 'Confirmatory drilling' which is a form of infill drilling.
Evidence · text
“Confirmatory drilling”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: The release details QA/QC procedures including certified labs, standards, duplicates, and blanks.
Evidence · text
“Control samples comprising certified reference samples, duplicates and blank samples were systematically inserted into the sample stream and analyzed as part of the Company's quality assurance / quality control protocol.”
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: The cut-off grade of 0.1% Sn with maximum consecutive internal waste of 4 metres is clearly stated for compositing.
Evidence · text
“All intersections are calculated with a cut-off grade of 0.1% Sn with maximum consecutive internal waste of 4 metres.”
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "TinOne Drills 14 Metres of 1.03% Tin Within a Near-Surface Intercept of 29 Metres of 0.71% at Its Great Pyramid Project,"
24GPRC028Great Pyramid · tinGrade: 0.56Grade Unit: %Intercept: 37 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24GPRC028
- Project
- Great Pyramid
- Commodity
- tin
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- TORC
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.56
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 37 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 37 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 24GPRC028:0-37
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Limited
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.1
- Cutoff Unit
- % Sn
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 4 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2024-10-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a strong, near-surface tin intercept from surface, confirming mineralization and bottoming in it, and returned approximately 21% higher tin grades than historical drilling, but true width is uncertain.
Positive factors
- Near-surface
- Confirmatory drilling
- Higher grades than historical
- Bottomed in mineralization
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“0.56”
Context: 37.0
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: The document explicitly states that all intersections are downhole widths and true widths are uncertain.
Evidence · text
“All intersections are downhole widths, true widths are uncertain.”
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: The drill program included 'Confirmatory drilling' which is a form of infill drilling.
Evidence · text
“Confirmatory drilling”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: The release details QA/QC procedures including certified labs, standards, duplicates, and blanks.
Evidence · text
“Control samples comprising certified reference samples, duplicates and blank samples were systematically inserted into the sample stream and analyzed as part of the Company's quality assurance / quality control protocol.”
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: The cut-off grade of 0.1% Sn with maximum consecutive internal waste of 4 metres is clearly stated for compositing.
Evidence · text
“All intersections are calculated with a cut-off grade of 0.1% Sn with maximum consecutive internal waste of 4 metres.”
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "TinOne Drills 14 Metres of 1.03% Tin Within a Near-Surface Intercept of 29 Metres of 0.71% at Its Great Pyramid Project,"
24GPRC028Great Pyramid · tinGrade: 0.91Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24GPRC028
- Project
- Great Pyramid
- Commodity
- tin
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- TORC
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.91
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 7 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 24GPRC028:0-7
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Limited
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.1
- Cutoff Unit
- % Sn
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 4 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2024-10-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This included intercept shows a strong tin grade at surface, contributing significantly to the overall mineralization, and is noted to have returned approximately 21% higher tin grades than historical drilling, but true width is uncertain.
Positive factors
- Strong grade for tin
- Near-surface
- Confirmatory drilling
- Higher grades than historical
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“0.91”
Context: 7.0
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: The document explicitly states that all intersections are downhole widths and true widths are uncertain.
Evidence · text
“All intersections are downhole widths, true widths are uncertain.”
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: The drill program included 'Confirmatory drilling' which is a form of infill drilling.
Evidence · text
“Confirmatory drilling”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: The release details QA/QC procedures including certified labs, standards, duplicates, and blanks.
Evidence · text
“Control samples comprising certified reference samples, duplicates and blank samples were systematically inserted into the sample stream and analyzed as part of the Company's quality assurance / quality control protocol.”
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: The cut-off grade of 0.1% Sn with maximum consecutive internal waste of 4 metres is clearly stated for compositing.
Evidence · text
“All intersections are calculated with a cut-off grade of 0.1% Sn with maximum consecutive internal waste of 4 metres.”
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "TinOne Drills 14 Metres of 1.03% Tin Within a Near-Surface Intercept of 29 Metres of 0.71% at Its Great Pyramid Project,"
24GPRC028Great Pyramid · tinGrade: 1.57Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24GPRC028
- Project
- Great Pyramid
- Commodity
- tin
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- TORC
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.57
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 19 m
- To
- 23 m
- Intercept Depth
- 19 m
Classification
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 24GPRC028:19-23
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Limited
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.1
- Cutoff Unit
- % Sn
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 4 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2024-10-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This included intercept shows a strong tin grade, contributing significantly to the overall mineralization, and is noted to have returned approximately 21% higher tin grades than historical drilling, but true width is uncertain.
Positive factors
- Strong grade for tin
- Near-surface
- Confirmatory drilling
- Higher grades than historical
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“1.57”
Context: 4.0
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: The document explicitly states that all intersections are downhole widths and true widths are uncertain.
Evidence · text
“All intersections are downhole widths, true widths are uncertain.”
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: The drill program included 'Confirmatory drilling' which is a form of infill drilling.
Evidence · text
“Confirmatory drilling”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: The release details QA/QC procedures including certified labs, standards, duplicates, and blanks.
Evidence · text
“Control samples comprising certified reference samples, duplicates and blank samples were systematically inserted into the sample stream and analyzed as part of the Company's quality assurance / quality control protocol.”
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: The cut-off grade of 0.1% Sn with maximum consecutive internal waste of 4 metres is clearly stated for compositing.
Evidence · text
“All intersections are calculated with a cut-off grade of 0.1% Sn with maximum consecutive internal waste of 4 metres.”
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "TinOne Drills 14 Metres of 1.03% Tin Within a Near-Surface Intercept of 29 Metres of 0.71% at Its Great Pyramid Project,"
24GPRC029Great Pyramid · tinGrade: 0.25Grade Unit: %Intercept: 36 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24GPRC029
- Project
- Great Pyramid
- Commodity
- tin
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- TORC
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.25
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 36 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 36 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 24GPRC029:0-36
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Limited
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.1
- Cutoff Unit
- % Sn
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 4 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2024-10-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This near-surface intercept confirms tin mineralization, but the grade is weak and true width is uncertain.
Positive factors
- Near-surface
- Confirmatory drilling
Negative factors
- Grade is weak for tin
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“0.25”
Context: 36.0
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: The document explicitly states that all intersections are downhole widths and true widths are uncertain.
Evidence · text
“All intersections are downhole widths, true widths are uncertain.”
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: The drill program included 'Confirmatory drilling' which is a form of infill drilling.
Evidence · text
“Confirmatory drilling”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: The release details QA/QC procedures including certified labs, standards, duplicates, and blanks.
Evidence · text
“Control samples comprising certified reference samples, duplicates and blank samples were systematically inserted into the sample stream and analyzed as part of the Company's quality assurance / quality control protocol.”
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: The cut-off grade of 0.1% Sn with maximum consecutive internal waste of 4 metres is clearly stated for compositing.
Evidence · text
“All intersections are calculated with a cut-off grade of 0.1% Sn with maximum consecutive internal waste of 4 metres.”
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "TinOne Drills 14 Metres of 1.03% Tin Within a Near-Surface Intercept of 29 Metres of 0.71% at Its Great Pyramid Project,"
24GPRC029Great Pyramid · tinGrade: 0.51Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24GPRC029
- Project
- Great Pyramid
- Commodity
- tin
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- TORC
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.51
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 24GPRC029:0-3
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Limited
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.1
- Cutoff Unit
- % Sn
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 4 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2024-10-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This included intercept shows a moderate tin grade at surface, contributing to the overall mineralization, but true width is uncertain.
Positive factors
- Near-surface
- Confirmatory drilling
- Grade is moderate for tin
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“0.51”
Context: 3.0
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: The document explicitly states that all intersections are downhole widths and true widths are uncertain.
Evidence · text
“All intersections are downhole widths, true widths are uncertain.”
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: The drill program included 'Confirmatory drilling' which is a form of infill drilling.
Evidence · text
“Confirmatory drilling”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: The release details QA/QC procedures including certified labs, standards, duplicates, and blanks.
Evidence · text
“Control samples comprising certified reference samples, duplicates and blank samples were systematically inserted into the sample stream and analyzed as part of the Company's quality assurance / quality control protocol.”
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: The cut-off grade of 0.1% Sn with maximum consecutive internal waste of 4 metres is clearly stated for compositing.
Evidence · table
“0.51”
Context: 3.0
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "TinOne Drills 14 Metres of 1.03% Tin Within a Near-Surface Intercept of 29 Metres of 0.71% at Its Great Pyramid Project,"
24GPRC029Great Pyramid · tinGrade: 0.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24GPRC029
- Project
- Great Pyramid
- Commodity
- tin
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- TORC
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.5
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 5 m
- From
- 8 m
- To
- 13 m
- Intercept Depth
- 8 m
Classification
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 24GPRC029:8-13
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Limited
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.1
- Cutoff Unit
- % Sn
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 4 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2024-10-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This included intercept shows a moderate tin grade, contributing to the overall mineralization, but true width is uncertain.
Positive factors
- Near-surface
- Confirmatory drilling
- Grade is moderate for tin
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“0.50”
Context: 5.0
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: The document explicitly states that all intersections are downhole widths and true widths are uncertain.
Evidence · text
“All intersections are downhole widths, true widths are uncertain.”
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: The drill program included 'Confirmatory drilling' which is a form of infill drilling.
Evidence · text
“Confirmatory drilling”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: The release details QA/QC procedures including certified labs, standards, duplicates, and blanks.
Evidence · text
“Control samples comprising certified reference samples, duplicates and blank samples were systematically inserted into the sample stream and analyzed as part of the Company's quality assurance / quality control protocol.”
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: The cut-off grade of 0.1% Sn with maximum consecutive internal waste of 4 metres is clearly stated for compositing.
Evidence · table
“0.50”
Context: 5.0
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "TinOne Drills 14 Metres of 1.03% Tin Within a Near-Surface Intercept of 29 Metres of 0.71% at Its Great Pyramid Project,"
24GPRC030AGreat Pyramid · tinGrade: 0.25Grade Unit: %Intercept: 9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24GPRC030A
- Project
- Great Pyramid
- Commodity
- tin
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- TORC
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.25
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 9 m
- From
- 14 m
- To
- 23 m
- Intercept Depth
- 14 m
Classification
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 24GPRC030A:14-23
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Limited
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.1
- Cutoff Unit
- % Sn
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 4 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2024-10-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept, targeting a high-grade fault, shows weak tin mineralization, and true width is uncertain.
Positive factors
- Targeting high-grade fault
- Near-surface
Negative factors
- Grade is weak for tin
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“0.25”
Context: 9.0
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: The document explicitly states that all intersections are downhole widths and true widths are uncertain.
Evidence · text
“All intersections are downhole widths, true widths are uncertain.”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: The release details QA/QC procedures including certified labs, standards, duplicates, and blanks.
Evidence · text
“Control samples comprising certified reference samples, duplicates and blank samples were systematically inserted into the sample stream and analyzed as part of the Company's quality assurance / quality control protocol.”
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: The cut-off grade of 0.1% Sn with maximum consecutive internal waste of 4 metres is clearly stated for compositing.
Evidence · text
“All intersections are calculated with a cut-off grade of 0.1% Sn with maximum consecutive internal waste of 4 metres.”
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "TinOne Drills 14 Metres of 1.03% Tin Within a Near-Surface Intercept of 29 Metres of 0.71% at Its Great Pyramid Project,"
24GPRC030AGreat Pyramid · tinGrade: 0.12Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24GPRC030A
- Project
- Great Pyramid
- Commodity
- tin
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- TORC
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.12
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 10 m
- From
- 31 m
- To
- 41 m
- Intercept Depth
- 31 m
Classification
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 24GPRC030A:31-41
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Limited
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.1
- Cutoff Unit
- % Sn
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 4 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2024-10-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept, targeting a high-grade fault, shows weak tin mineralization, and true width is uncertain.
Positive factors
- Targeting high-grade fault
Negative factors
- Grade is weak for tin
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“0.12”
Context: 10.0
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: The document explicitly states that all intersections are downhole widths and true widths are uncertain.
Evidence · text
“All intersections are downhole widths, true widths are uncertain.”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: The release details QA/QC procedures including certified labs, standards, duplicates, and blanks.
Evidence · text
“Control samples comprising certified reference samples, duplicates and blank samples were systematically inserted into the sample stream and analyzed as part of the Company's quality assurance / quality control protocol.”
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: The cut-off grade of 0.1% Sn with maximum consecutive internal waste of 4 metres is clearly stated for compositing.
Evidence · text
“All intersections are calculated with a cut-off grade of 0.1% Sn with maximum consecutive internal waste of 4 metres.”
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "TinOne Drills 14 Metres of 1.03% Tin Within a Near-Surface Intercept of 29 Metres of 0.71% at Its Great Pyramid Project,"
24GPRC030AGreat Pyramid · tinGrade: 0.12Grade Unit: %Intercept: 11 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24GPRC030A
- Project
- Great Pyramid
- Commodity
- tin
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- TORC
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.12
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 11 m
- From
- 67 m
- To
- 78 m
- Intercept Depth
- 67 m
Classification
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 24GPRC030A:67-78
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Limited
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.1
- Cutoff Unit
- % Sn
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 4 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2024-10-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept, targeting a high-grade fault, shows weak tin mineralization, and true width is uncertain.
Positive factors
- Targeting high-grade fault
Negative factors
- Grade is weak for tin
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“0.12”
Context: 11.0
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: The document explicitly states that all intersections are downhole widths and true widths are uncertain.
Evidence · text
“All intersections are downhole widths, true widths are uncertain.”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: The release details QA/QC procedures including certified labs, standards, duplicates, and blanks.
Evidence · text
“Control samples comprising certified reference samples, duplicates and blank samples were systematically inserted into the sample stream and analyzed as part of the Company's quality assurance / quality control protocol.”
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: The cut-off grade of 0.1% Sn with maximum consecutive internal waste of 4 metres is clearly stated for compositing.
Evidence · text
“All intersections are calculated with a cut-off grade of 0.1% Sn with maximum consecutive internal waste of 4 metres.”
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "TinOne Drills 14 Metres of 1.03% Tin Within a Near-Surface Intercept of 29 Metres of 0.71% at Its Great Pyramid Project,"
24GPRC030AGreat Pyramid · tinGrade: 0.15Grade Unit: %Intercept: 8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24GPRC030A
- Project
- Great Pyramid
- Commodity
- tin
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- australia_tas
- Ticker
- TORC
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.15
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 8 m
- From
- 243 m
- To
- 251 m
- Intercept Depth
- 243 m
Classification
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 24GPRC030A:243-251
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Limited
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.1
- Cutoff Unit
- % Sn
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 4 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2024-10-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept, targeting a high-grade fault, shows weak tin mineralization, and true width is uncertain.
Positive factors
- Targeting high-grade fault
Negative factors
- Grade is weak for tin
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“0.15”
Context: 8.0
Tags used in scoring
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: The document explicitly states that all intersections are downhole widths and true widths are uncertain.
Evidence · text
“All intersections are downhole widths, true widths are uncertain.”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: The release details QA/QC procedures including certified labs, standards, duplicates, and blanks.
Evidence · text
“Control samples comprising certified reference samples, duplicates and blank samples were systematically inserted into the sample stream and analyzed as part of the Company's quality assurance / quality control protocol.”
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: The cut-off grade of 0.1% Sn with maximum consecutive internal waste of 4 metres is clearly stated for compositing.
Evidence · text
“All intersections are calculated with a cut-off grade of 0.1% Sn with maximum consecutive internal waste of 4 metres.”
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "TinOne Drills 14 Metres of 1.03% Tin Within a Near-Surface Intercept of 29 Metres of 0.71% at Its Great Pyramid Project,"
Resource Estimates (1)
inferredGreat Pyramid · tinTonnes: 8390000Grade: 0.17Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 14.4Contained Unit: ktView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Great Pyramid
- Commodity
- tin
- Region
- australia_tas
- Reported Region
- Tasmania, Australia
- Ticker
- TORC
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Effective date
- 2023-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards
- ni_43_101
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Russell Fulton
- Resource group id
- resource:514c4ca58d71576ef235
- Mining method
- open_pit
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 8390000
- Grade
- 0.17
- Grade Unit
- %
- Contained Metal
- 14.4
- Contained Unit
- kt
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.1
- Cutoff Unit
- % Sn
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2023-12-31
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2024-10-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a restatement of a 2023 Inferred Mineral Resource Estimate, compliant with NI 43-101 and signed off by a QP, providing a baseline for the project.
Positive factors
- NI 43-101 compliant
- QP signed
- Cut-off disclosed
Negative factors
- Inferred category only
- Estimate from 2023 (not new)
Evidence · table
“0.17”
Context: 8.39
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: The resource is classified as 'Inferred', indicating a lower level of geological confidence.
Evidence · table
“Inferred”
Context: 14.40
All Inferrednegative
M&I share below the weak bound — very early stage, no engineering confidence.
Why it applies: The resource estimate is entirely in the Inferred category, indicating early stage and speculative nature.
Evidence · table
“Inferred”
Context: 14.40
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: The cut-off grade of 0.10% Sn is clearly stated for the resource estimate.
Evidence · table
“> 0.10”
Context: 14.40
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: The MRE was prepared in accordance with National Instrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects.
Evidence · text
“In 2023, a mineral resource estimate (MRE) was prepared in accordance with Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum Definition Standards for Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves adopted May 19, 2014, and in accordance with National Instrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects.”
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: Russell Fulton (MAIG), VP Exploration for TinOne, is a Qualified Person as defined under NI 43-101 and approved the technical information.
Evidence · text
“The Company's disclosure of technical or scientific information in this press release has been reviewed and approved by Russell Fulton (MAIG), VP Exploration for TinOne. Mr. Fulton is a Qualified Person as defined under the terms of National Instrument 43-101.”
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: The document presents an existing mineral resource estimate from 2023.
Evidence · text
“In 2023, a mineral resource estimate (MRE) was prepared”
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.