# Tomingley Drilling Discovers New Mineralisation at McLeans

Canonical Atlas analysis: https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/tomingley-drilling-discovers-new-mineralisation-at-mcleans--87109acd-dfe0-4953-83ee-2235168ecd9b

Original source: https://finance.yahoo.com/news/tomingley-drilling-discovers-mineralisation-mcleans-233800819.html

Publisher: yahoo\_press

Original announcement: 2025-11-02T23:38:00.000Z

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published: Unknown date

Atlas analysis updated: Unknown date

- Company: Unavailable

- Ticker: ALK

- Exchange: ASX

- Region: Unavailable

- Primary commodity: Unavailable

- Secondary commodities: None reported

- Document categories: Drill results, Resource update

- Extracted: 2026-09-19 18:07:43 UTC

Narrative sentiment: 0.20 · Bullish

## Minestarters Atlas summary

Tomingley has completed a 3,247 metre underground diamond drilling program consisting of 9 holes. The program aimed to define resource extensions and improve confidence in Inferred Resources at McLeans and the Western Monzodiorite domain at Roswell.

Reasoning: The document reports drilling activity aimed at resource definition and discovery, but the text is truncated before providing specific assay grades or intercept lengths.

- Positive factor: Discovery of new mineralisation

- Positive factor: Proximity to existing underground infrastructure

Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.

Facts used in scoring: 1

## Classification and evidence

**Infill Drilling**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: Drilling is explicitly described as being focused on improving confidence of Inferred Resources.

Evidence · text

> completed to improve the confidence of the Inferred Resource at McLeans

**Step-Out Extension**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Why it applies: Drilling is focused on defining extensions to resources.

Evidence · text

> focused on defining extensions to resources

## Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 1. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

## Drill Results (1)

### Fact 1

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/tomingley-drilling-discovers-new-mineralisation-at-mcleans--87109acd-dfe0-4953-83ee-2235168ecd9b#fact-drill-facts-0)

Tomingley

Needs review: drill\_no\_hole\_id

#### Identity

- Project: Tomingley
- Ticker: ALK

#### Geometry

- Hole Depth: 3247 m

#### Classification

- Program: resource
- Sample Type: drill
- Mining Method: underground

#### Location

- Location: McLeans
- Loc. Source: document

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: drill\_no\_hole\_id
- Interp. Status: zero\_all
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-11-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The document provides program totals but lacks specific hole-by-hole assay data due to text truncation.

Evidence · text

> Underground drilling comprising of 9 diamond holes for a total of 3,247 metres

#### Tags used in scoring

**No QA/QC Disclosure**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**Infill Drilling**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill\_program\_type is "resource"

## How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.