Transatlantic Intercepts up to 6.0 g/t Au and 13.71 g/t Ag over 1.5 Meters at the Historic Miller Gold Mine, Montana
Original announcement by tmx on
- Company
- Transatlantic Mining Corp.
- Ticker
- TCO
- Exchange
- TSX
- Region
- Montana, USA
- Primary commodity
- Gold
- Secondary commodities
- Silver
- Document categories
- Drill results
- Extracted
- 2026-09-13 02:54:38 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Transatlantic Mining Corp. announced high-grade gold and silver drill results from its maiden 25-hole program at the Miller Gold Mine in Montana, USA. Highlights include 1.5 meters at 6.0 g/t Au and 13.71 g/t Ag, with the program confirming and extending mineralization along strike and down dip. The company also reported an exceptional surface sample of 0.5 meters true width at 370 g/t Au and 270 g/t Ag, and identified mineralization in a waste dump, indicating further exploration potential.
Reasoning: Transatlantic Mining's maiden drill program at the Miller Gold Mine delivered strong gold and silver intercepts, confirming and extending mineralization. While the high grades and exploration success are positive, the unknown true width and noted nugget effect introduce some uncertainty. The disclosed QA/QC procedures provide good confidence in the reported assays.
Positive factors
- High-grade gold intercepts, including 6.0 g/t Au over 1.5 m and a surface sample of 370 g/t Au, indicate significant mineralization.
- The maiden drill program successfully confirmed and extended mineralization along strike and down dip, opening up future exploration targets.
- QA/QC procedures are disclosed, including the use of an independent, umpire laboratory and insertion of standards, enhancing data credibility.
- The discovery of mineralization in a waste dump suggests potential for additional resources.
Negative factors
- The true width of the drill intercepts is unknown, which may overstate the actual thickness of mineralization.
- The document notes a 'high nugget affect', which can lead to variability in assay results and complicate resource estimation.
- Cut-off grades for reporting intervals are not disclosed, making it difficult to assess the economic significance of the reported lengths.
Facts used in scoring: 50
Classification and evidence
Bonanza Interceptpositive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Why it applies: The surface sample reported 370 g/t Au, which is exceptionally high-grade for gold.
Evidence · text
“370 g/t Au”
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: The document explicitly states that 'The relationship of downhole width to true width of mineralisation is unknown' for the drill intercepts.
Evidence · text
“The relationship of downhole width to true width of mineralisation is unknown”
Step-Out Extensionpositive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Why it applies: The drilling identified and extended the granodiorite-metasediment contact 200 metres to the north and 150 metres to the south.
Evidence · text
“The drilling identified and extended the granodiorite -metasediment contact 200 metres to the north with Hole MMRC2504... and 150 metres to the south where MMRC2514 is situated”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: The release mentions a Qualified Person sign-off, an independent umpire laboratory, and the use of standards in the drilling samples.
Evidence · text
“Aslam Awan PhD MAusIMM (CP Geo) is the Qualified Person pursuant to National Instrument 43-101 for having reviewed and approved the technical information contained in this news release. ... The Laboratory is an independent assay and umpire laboratory that follows industry techniques. The reverse circulation drilling samples had a standard inserted every 25 samples.”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: The document does not state the cut-off grade used for reporting the drill intercepts.
Evidence · text
“The complete set of drillhole assays is shown in Table A.”
Maiden Resourceneutral · Story-specific tag
First formal MRE for the project — establishes baseline but typically exploration-stage with high Inferred component. No prior estimate exists, so every change band is not applicable.
Why it applies: The document refers to this as a 'maiden drill program' for the project.
Evidence · text
“This maiden drill program also uncovered vein and contact extension”
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: The surface sample explicitly states '0.5 metres true width'.
Evidence · text
“0.5 metres true width”
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 50. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (50)
MMRC_2501Miller Gold Mine · goldGrade: 1.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MMRC_2501
- Project
- Miller Gold Mine
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_mt
- Reported Region
- usa_mt
- Ticker
- TCO
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 117.3 m
- To
- 118.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 117.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MMRC_2501:117.3-118.9
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Christofferson Laboratory
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, umpire
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept confirms mineralization in the maiden drill program, but the gold grade is moderate for an orogenic deposit, and true width is not disclosed.
Positive factors
- Intercept confirms mineralization in a maiden drill program.
Negative factors
- Grade is moderate for an orogenic gold deposit.
- True width of mineralization is unknown.
Evidence · table
“1.20”
Context: 1.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Section on Hole 14 at the Miller Mine in Montana (see Appendix A also) To view an enhanced version of this graphic, plea"
MMRC_2501Miller Gold Mine · silverGrade: 9.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MMRC_2501
- Project
- Miller Gold Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_mt
- Reported Region
- usa_mt
- Ticker
- TCO
Geometry
- Grade
- 9.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 117.3 m
- To
- 118.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 117.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MMRC_2501:117.3-118.9
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Christofferson Laboratory
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, umpire
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept confirms mineralization in the maiden drill program, but the silver grade is moderate, and true width is not disclosed.
Positive factors
- Intercept confirms mineralization in a maiden drill program.
Negative factors
- Silver grade is moderate.
- True width of mineralization is unknown.
Evidence · table
“9.60”
Context: 1.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Section on Hole 14 at the Miller Mine in Montana (see Appendix A also) To view an enhanced version of this graphic, plea"
MMRC_2501Miller Gold Mine · goldGrade: 1.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MMRC_2501
- Project
- Miller Gold Mine
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_mt
- Reported Region
- usa_mt
- Ticker
- TCO
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 169.2 m
- To
- 172.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 117.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MMRC_2501:169.2-172.2
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Christofferson Laboratory
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, umpire
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept confirms mineralization in the maiden drill program, but the gold grade is moderate for an orogenic deposit, and true width is not disclosed.
Positive factors
- Intercept confirms mineralization in a maiden drill program.
Negative factors
- Grade is moderate for an orogenic gold deposit.
- True width of mineralization is unknown.
Evidence · table
“1.20”
Context: 3.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Section on Hole 14 at the Miller Mine in Montana (see Appendix A also) To view an enhanced version of this graphic, plea"
MMRC_2501Miller Gold Mine · silverGrade: 7.54Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MMRC_2501
- Project
- Miller Gold Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_mt
- Reported Region
- usa_mt
- Ticker
- TCO
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.54
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 169.2 m
- To
- 172.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 117.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MMRC_2501:169.2-172.2
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Christofferson Laboratory
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, umpire
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept confirms mineralization in the maiden drill program, but the silver grade is moderate, and true width is not disclosed.
Positive factors
- Intercept confirms mineralization in a maiden drill program.
Negative factors
- Silver grade is moderate.
- True width of mineralization is unknown.
Evidence · table
“7.54”
Context: 3.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Section on Hole 14 at the Miller Mine in Montana (see Appendix A also) To view an enhanced version of this graphic, plea"
MMRC_2502Miller Gold Mine · goldGrade: 1.61Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MMRC_2502
- Project
- Miller Gold Mine
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_mt
- Reported Region
- usa_mt
- Ticker
- TCO
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.61
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 120.4 m
- To
- 121.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 120.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MMRC_2502:120.4-121.9
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Christofferson Laboratory
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, umpire
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept confirms mineralization in the maiden drill program, but the gold grade is moderate for an orogenic deposit, and true width is not disclosed.
Positive factors
- Intercept confirms mineralization in a maiden drill program.
Negative factors
- Grade is moderate for an orogenic gold deposit.
- True width of mineralization is unknown.
Evidence · table
“1.61”
Context: 1.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Section on Hole 14 at the Miller Mine in Montana (see Appendix A also) To view an enhanced version of this graphic, plea"
MMRC_2502Miller Gold Mine · silverGrade: 6.17Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MMRC_2502
- Project
- Miller Gold Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_mt
- Reported Region
- usa_mt
- Ticker
- TCO
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.17
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 120.4 m
- To
- 121.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 120.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MMRC_2502:120.4-121.9
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Christofferson Laboratory
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, umpire
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept confirms mineralization in the maiden drill program, but the silver grade is moderate, and true width is not disclosed.
Positive factors
- Intercept confirms mineralization in a maiden drill program.
Negative factors
- Silver grade is moderate.
- True width of mineralization is unknown.
Evidence · table
“6.17”
Context: 1.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Section on Hole 14 at the Miller Mine in Montana (see Appendix A also) To view an enhanced version of this graphic, plea"
MMRC_2503Miller Gold Mine · goldGrade: 2.66Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MMRC_2503
- Project
- Miller Gold Mine
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_mt
- Reported Region
- usa_mt
- Ticker
- TCO
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.66
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.5 m
- From
- 89.9 m
- To
- 94.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 89.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MMRC_2503:89.9-94.4
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Christofferson Laboratory
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, umpire
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a strong gold grade for an orogenic deposit and confirms mineralization in the maiden drill program, but true width is not disclosed.
Positive factors
- Strong gold grade for an orogenic deposit.
- Intercept confirms mineralization in a maiden drill program.
Negative factors
- True width of mineralization is unknown.
Evidence · table
“2.66”
Context: 4.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Section on Hole 14 at the Miller Mine in Montana (see Appendix A also) To view an enhanced version of this graphic, plea"
MMRC_2503Miller Gold Mine · silverGrade: 10.74Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MMRC_2503
- Project
- Miller Gold Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_mt
- Reported Region
- usa_mt
- Ticker
- TCO
Geometry
- Grade
- 10.74
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.5 m
- From
- 89.9 m
- To
- 94.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 89.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MMRC_2503:89.9-94.4
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Christofferson Laboratory
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, umpire
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept confirms mineralization in the maiden drill program, but the silver grade is moderate, and true width is not disclosed.
Positive factors
- Intercept confirms mineralization in a maiden drill program.
Negative factors
- Silver grade is moderate.
- True width of mineralization is unknown.
Evidence · table
“10.74”
Context: 4.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Section on Hole 14 at the Miller Mine in Montana (see Appendix A also) To view an enhanced version of this graphic, plea"
MMRC_2504Miller Gold Mine · goldGrade: 5.76Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MMRC_2504
- Project
- Miller Gold Mine
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_mt
- Reported Region
- usa_mt
- Ticker
- TCO
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.76
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 123.5 m
- To
- 125 m
- Intercept Depth
- 123.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MMRC_2504:123.5-125
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Christofferson Laboratory
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, umpire
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows an exceptional gold grade and extends mineralization to the north, but true width is not disclosed.
Positive factors
- Exceptional gold grade for an orogenic deposit.
- Intercept extends mineralization 200 meters to the north.
Negative factors
- True width of mineralization is unknown.
Evidence · table
“5.76”
Context: 1.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Section on Hole 14 at the Miller Mine in Montana (see Appendix A also) To view an enhanced version of this graphic, plea"
MMRC_2504Miller Gold Mine · silverGrade: 21.94Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MMRC_2504
- Project
- Miller Gold Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_mt
- Reported Region
- usa_mt
- Ticker
- TCO
Geometry
- Grade
- 21.94
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 123.5 m
- To
- 125 m
- Intercept Depth
- 123.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MMRC_2504:123.5-125
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Christofferson Laboratory
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, umpire
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a strong silver grade and extends mineralization to the north, but true width is not disclosed.
Positive factors
- Strong silver grade.
- Intercept extends mineralization 200 meters to the north.
Negative factors
- True width of mineralization is unknown.
Evidence · table
“21.94”
Context: 1.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Section on Hole 14 at the Miller Mine in Montana (see Appendix A also) To view an enhanced version of this graphic, plea"
MMRC_2504Miller Gold Mine · goldGrade: 4.15Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MMRC_2504
- Project
- Miller Gold Mine
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_mt
- Reported Region
- usa_mt
- Ticker
- TCO
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.15
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 129.5 m
- To
- 131 m
- Intercept Depth
- 123.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MMRC_2504:129.5-131
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Christofferson Laboratory
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, umpire
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a strong gold grade and extends mineralization to the north, but true width is not disclosed.
Positive factors
- Strong gold grade for an orogenic deposit.
- Intercept extends mineralization 200 meters to the north.
Negative factors
- True width of mineralization is unknown.
Evidence · table
“4.15”
Context: 1.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Section on Hole 14 at the Miller Mine in Montana (see Appendix A also) To view an enhanced version of this graphic, plea"
MMRC_2504Miller Gold Mine · silverGrade: 15.43Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MMRC_2504
- Project
- Miller Gold Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_mt
- Reported Region
- usa_mt
- Ticker
- TCO
Geometry
- Grade
- 15.43
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 129.5 m
- To
- 131 m
- Intercept Depth
- 123.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MMRC_2504:129.5-131
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Christofferson Laboratory
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, umpire
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a strong silver grade and extends mineralization to the north, but true width is not disclosed.
Positive factors
- Strong silver grade.
- Intercept extends mineralization 200 meters to the north.
Negative factors
- True width of mineralization is unknown.
Evidence · table
“15.43”
Context: 1.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Section on Hole 14 at the Miller Mine in Montana (see Appendix A also) To view an enhanced version of this graphic, plea"
MMRC_2506Miller Gold Mine · goldGrade: 1.65Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MMRC_2506
- Project
- Miller Gold Mine
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_mt
- Reported Region
- usa_mt
- Ticker
- TCO
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.65
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 114.3 m
- To
- 117.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 114.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MMRC_2506:114.3-117.3
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Christofferson Laboratory
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, umpire
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept confirms mineralization in the maiden drill program, but the gold grade is moderate for an orogenic deposit, and true width is not disclosed.
Positive factors
- Intercept confirms mineralization in a maiden drill program.
Negative factors
- Grade is moderate for an orogenic gold deposit.
- True width of mineralization is unknown.
Evidence · table
“1.65”
Context: 3.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Section on Hole 14 at the Miller Mine in Montana (see Appendix A also) To view an enhanced version of this graphic, plea"
MMRC_2506Miller Gold Mine · silverGrade: 6.86Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MMRC_2506
- Project
- Miller Gold Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_mt
- Reported Region
- usa_mt
- Ticker
- TCO
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.86
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 114.3 m
- To
- 117.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 114.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MMRC_2506:114.3-117.3
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Christofferson Laboratory
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, umpire
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept confirms mineralization in the maiden drill program, but the silver grade is moderate, and true width is not disclosed.
Positive factors
- Intercept confirms mineralization in a maiden drill program.
Negative factors
- Silver grade is moderate.
- True width of mineralization is unknown.
Evidence · table
“6.86”
Context: 3.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Section on Hole 14 at the Miller Mine in Montana (see Appendix A also) To view an enhanced version of this graphic, plea"
MMRC_2507Miller Gold Mine · goldGrade: 1.23Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MMRC_2507
- Project
- Miller Gold Mine
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_mt
- Reported Region
- usa_mt
- Ticker
- TCO
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.23
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 141.7 m
- To
- 143.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 141.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MMRC_2507:141.7-143.2
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Christofferson Laboratory
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, umpire
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept confirms mineralization in the maiden drill program, but the gold grade is moderate for an orogenic deposit, and true width is not disclosed.
Positive factors
- Intercept confirms mineralization in a maiden drill program.
Negative factors
- Grade is moderate for an orogenic gold deposit.
- True width of mineralization is unknown.
Evidence · table
“1.23”
Context: 1.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Section on Hole 14 at the Miller Mine in Montana (see Appendix A also) To view an enhanced version of this graphic, plea"
MMRC_2507Miller Gold Mine · silverGrade: 12Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MMRC_2507
- Project
- Miller Gold Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_mt
- Reported Region
- usa_mt
- Ticker
- TCO
Geometry
- Grade
- 12
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 141.7 m
- To
- 143.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 141.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MMRC_2507:141.7-143.2
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Christofferson Laboratory
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, umpire
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept confirms mineralization in the maiden drill program, but the silver grade is moderate, and true width is not disclosed.
Positive factors
- Intercept confirms mineralization in a maiden drill program.
Negative factors
- Silver grade is moderate.
- True width of mineralization is unknown.
Evidence · table
“12.00”
Context: 1.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Section on Hole 14 at the Miller Mine in Montana (see Appendix A also) To view an enhanced version of this graphic, plea"
MMRC_2507Miller Gold Mine · goldGrade: 2.88Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MMRC_2507
- Project
- Miller Gold Mine
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_mt
- Reported Region
- usa_mt
- Ticker
- TCO
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.88
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 144.8 m
- To
- 146.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 141.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MMRC_2507:144.8-146.3
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Christofferson Laboratory
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, umpire
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a strong gold grade for an orogenic deposit and confirms mineralization in the maiden drill program, but true width is not disclosed.
Positive factors
- Strong gold grade for an orogenic deposit.
- Intercept confirms mineralization in a maiden drill program.
Negative factors
- True width of mineralization is unknown.
Evidence · table
“2.88”
Context: 1.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Section on Hole 14 at the Miller Mine in Montana (see Appendix A also) To view an enhanced version of this graphic, plea"
MMRC_2507Miller Gold Mine · silverGrade: 9.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MMRC_2507
- Project
- Miller Gold Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_mt
- Reported Region
- usa_mt
- Ticker
- TCO
Geometry
- Grade
- 9.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 144.8 m
- To
- 146.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 141.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MMRC_2507:144.8-146.3
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Christofferson Laboratory
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, umpire
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept confirms mineralization in the maiden drill program, but the silver grade is moderate, and true width is not disclosed.
Positive factors
- Intercept confirms mineralization in a maiden drill program.
Negative factors
- Silver grade is moderate.
- True width of mineralization is unknown.
Evidence · table
“9.60”
Context: 1.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Section on Hole 14 at the Miller Mine in Montana (see Appendix A also) To view an enhanced version of this graphic, plea"
MMRC_2507Miller Gold Mine · goldGrade: 2.26Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MMRC_2507
- Project
- Miller Gold Mine
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_mt
- Reported Region
- usa_mt
- Ticker
- TCO
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.26
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 147.8 m
- To
- 149.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 141.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MMRC_2507:147.8-149.3
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Christofferson Laboratory
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, umpire
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept confirms mineralization in the maiden drill program with a moderate gold grade, but true width is not disclosed.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold grade for an orogenic deposit.
- Intercept confirms mineralization in a maiden drill program.
Negative factors
- True width of mineralization is unknown.
Evidence · table
“2.26”
Context: 1.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Section on Hole 14 at the Miller Mine in Montana (see Appendix A also) To view an enhanced version of this graphic, plea"
MMRC_2507Miller Gold Mine · silverGrade: 8.57Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MMRC_2507
- Project
- Miller Gold Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_mt
- Reported Region
- usa_mt
- Ticker
- TCO
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.57
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 147.8 m
- To
- 149.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 141.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MMRC_2507:147.8-149.3
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Christofferson Laboratory
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, umpire
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept confirms mineralization in the maiden drill program, but the silver grade is moderate, and true width is not disclosed.
Positive factors
- Intercept confirms mineralization in a maiden drill program.
Negative factors
- Silver grade is moderate.
- True width of mineralization is unknown.
Evidence · table
“8.57”
Context: 1.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Section on Hole 14 at the Miller Mine in Montana (see Appendix A also) To view an enhanced version of this graphic, plea"
MMRC_2508Miller Gold Mine · goldGrade: 1.17Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MMRC_2508
- Project
- Miller Gold Mine
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_mt
- Reported Region
- usa_mt
- Ticker
- TCO
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.17
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 97.5 m
- To
- 99 m
- Intercept Depth
- 97.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MMRC_2508:97.5-99
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Christofferson Laboratory
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, umpire
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept confirms mineralization in the maiden drill program, but the gold grade is moderate for an orogenic deposit, and true width is not disclosed.
Positive factors
- Intercept confirms mineralization in a maiden drill program.
Negative factors
- Grade is moderate for an orogenic gold deposit.
- True width of mineralization is unknown.
Evidence · table
“1.17”
Context: 1.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Section on Hole 14 at the Miller Mine in Montana (see Appendix A also) To view an enhanced version of this graphic, plea"
MMRC_2508Miller Gold Mine · silverGrade: 7.54Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MMRC_2508
- Project
- Miller Gold Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_mt
- Reported Region
- usa_mt
- Ticker
- TCO
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.54
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 97.5 m
- To
- 99 m
- Intercept Depth
- 97.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MMRC_2508:97.5-99
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Christofferson Laboratory
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, umpire
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept confirms mineralization in the maiden drill program, but the silver grade is moderate, and true width is not disclosed.
Positive factors
- Intercept confirms mineralization in a maiden drill program.
Negative factors
- Silver grade is moderate.
- True width of mineralization is unknown.
Evidence · table
“7.54”
Context: 1.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Section on Hole 14 at the Miller Mine in Montana (see Appendix A also) To view an enhanced version of this graphic, plea"
MMRC_2508Miller Gold Mine · goldGrade: 1.23Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MMRC_2508
- Project
- Miller Gold Mine
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_mt
- Reported Region
- usa_mt
- Ticker
- TCO
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.23
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 114.3 m
- To
- 115.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 97.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MMRC_2508:114.3-115.8
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Christofferson Laboratory
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, umpire
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept confirms mineralization in the maiden drill program, but the gold grade is moderate for an orogenic deposit, and true width is not disclosed.
Positive factors
- Intercept confirms mineralization in a maiden drill program.
Negative factors
- Grade is moderate for an orogenic gold deposit.
- True width of mineralization is unknown.
Evidence · table
“1.23”
Context: 1.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Section on Hole 14 at the Miller Mine in Montana (see Appendix A also) To view an enhanced version of this graphic, plea"
MMRC_2508Miller Gold Mine · silverGrade: 6.17Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MMRC_2508
- Project
- Miller Gold Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_mt
- Reported Region
- usa_mt
- Ticker
- TCO
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.17
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 114.3 m
- To
- 115.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 97.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MMRC_2508:114.3-115.8
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Christofferson Laboratory
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, umpire
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept confirms mineralization in the maiden drill program, but the silver grade is moderate, and true width is not disclosed.
Positive factors
- Intercept confirms mineralization in a maiden drill program.
Negative factors
- Silver grade is moderate.
- True width of mineralization is unknown.
Evidence · table
“6.17”
Context: 1.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Section on Hole 14 at the Miller Mine in Montana (see Appendix A also) To view an enhanced version of this graphic, plea"
MMRC_2509Miller Gold Mine · goldGrade: 1.65Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MMRC_2509
- Project
- Miller Gold Mine
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_mt
- Reported Region
- usa_mt
- Ticker
- TCO
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.65
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 6.1 m
- To
- 7.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 6.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MMRC_2509:6.1-7.6
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Christofferson Laboratory
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, umpire
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept confirms mineralization in the maiden drill program, but the gold grade is moderate for an orogenic deposit, and true width is not disclosed.
Positive factors
- Intercept confirms mineralization in a maiden drill program.
Negative factors
- Grade is moderate for an orogenic gold deposit.
- True width of mineralization is unknown.
Evidence · table
“1.65”
Context: 1.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Section on Hole 14 at the Miller Mine in Montana (see Appendix A also) To view an enhanced version of this graphic, plea"
MMRC_2509Miller Gold Mine · silverGrade: 4.11Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MMRC_2509
- Project
- Miller Gold Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_mt
- Reported Region
- usa_mt
- Ticker
- TCO
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.11
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 6.1 m
- To
- 7.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 6.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MMRC_2509:6.1-7.6
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Christofferson Laboratory
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, umpire
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept confirms mineralization in the maiden drill program, but the silver grade is weak, and true width is not disclosed.
Positive factors
- Intercept confirms mineralization in a maiden drill program.
Negative factors
- Silver grade is weak.
- True width of mineralization is unknown.
Evidence · table
“4.11”
Context: 1.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Section on Hole 14 at the Miller Mine in Montana (see Appendix A also) To view an enhanced version of this graphic, plea"
MMRC_2509Miller Gold Mine · goldGrade: 1.03Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MMRC_2509
- Project
- Miller Gold Mine
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_mt
- Reported Region
- usa_mt
- Ticker
- TCO
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.03
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 16.8 m
- To
- 18.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 6.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MMRC_2509:16.8-18.3
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Christofferson Laboratory
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, umpire
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept confirms mineralization in the maiden drill program, but the gold grade is moderate for an orogenic deposit, and true width is not disclosed.
Positive factors
- Intercept confirms mineralization in a maiden drill program.
Negative factors
- Grade is moderate for an orogenic gold deposit.
- True width of mineralization is unknown.
Evidence · table
“1.03”
Context: 1.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Section on Hole 14 at the Miller Mine in Montana (see Appendix A also) To view an enhanced version of this graphic, plea"
MMRC_2509Miller Gold Mine · silverGrade: 8.57Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MMRC_2509
- Project
- Miller Gold Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_mt
- Reported Region
- usa_mt
- Ticker
- TCO
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.57
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 16.8 m
- To
- 18.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 6.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MMRC_2509:16.8-18.3
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Christofferson Laboratory
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, umpire
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept confirms mineralization in the maiden drill program, but the silver grade is moderate, and true width is not disclosed.
Positive factors
- Intercept confirms mineralization in a maiden drill program.
Negative factors
- Silver grade is moderate.
- True width of mineralization is unknown.
Evidence · table
“8.57”
Context: 1.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Section on Hole 14 at the Miller Mine in Montana (see Appendix A also) To view an enhanced version of this graphic, plea"
MMRC_2510Miller Gold Mine · goldGrade: 2.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MMRC_2510
- Project
- Miller Gold Mine
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_mt
- Reported Region
- usa_mt
- Ticker
- TCO
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 13.7 m
- To
- 15.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 13.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MMRC_2510:13.7-15.2
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Christofferson Laboratory
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, umpire
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept confirms mineralization in the maiden drill program with a moderate gold grade, but true width is not disclosed.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold grade for an orogenic deposit.
- Intercept confirms mineralization in a maiden drill program.
Negative factors
- True width of mineralization is unknown.
Evidence · table
“2.40”
Context: 1.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Section on Hole 14 at the Miller Mine in Montana (see Appendix A also) To view an enhanced version of this graphic, plea"
MMRC_2510Miller Gold Mine · silverGrade: 10.97Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MMRC_2510
- Project
- Miller Gold Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_mt
- Reported Region
- usa_mt
- Ticker
- TCO
Geometry
- Grade
- 10.97
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 13.7 m
- To
- 15.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 13.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MMRC_2510:13.7-15.2
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Christofferson Laboratory
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, umpire
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept confirms mineralization in the maiden drill program, but the silver grade is moderate, and true width is not disclosed.
Positive factors
- Intercept confirms mineralization in a maiden drill program.
Negative factors
- Silver grade is moderate.
- True width of mineralization is unknown.
Evidence · table
“10.97”
Context: 1.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Section on Hole 14 at the Miller Mine in Montana (see Appendix A also) To view an enhanced version of this graphic, plea"
MMRC_2510Miller Gold Mine · goldGrade: 1.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MMRC_2510
- Project
- Miller Gold Mine
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_mt
- Reported Region
- usa_mt
- Ticker
- TCO
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 89.9 m
- To
- 91.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 13.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MMRC_2510:89.9-91.4
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Christofferson Laboratory
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, umpire
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept confirms mineralization in the maiden drill program, but the gold grade is moderate for an orogenic deposit, and true width is not disclosed.
Positive factors
- Intercept confirms mineralization in a maiden drill program.
Negative factors
- Grade is moderate for an orogenic gold deposit.
- True width of mineralization is unknown.
Evidence · table
“1.20”
Context: 1.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Section on Hole 14 at the Miller Mine in Montana (see Appendix A also) To view an enhanced version of this graphic, plea"
MMRC_2510Miller Gold Mine · silverGrade: 20.57Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MMRC_2510
- Project
- Miller Gold Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_mt
- Reported Region
- usa_mt
- Ticker
- TCO
Geometry
- Grade
- 20.57
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 89.9 m
- To
- 91.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 13.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MMRC_2510:89.9-91.4
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Christofferson Laboratory
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, umpire
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept confirms mineralization in the maiden drill program with a strong silver grade, but true width is not disclosed.
Positive factors
- Strong silver grade.
- Intercept confirms mineralization in a maiden drill program.
Negative factors
- True width of mineralization is unknown.
Evidence · table
“20.57”
Context: 1.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Section on Hole 14 at the Miller Mine in Montana (see Appendix A also) To view an enhanced version of this graphic, plea"
MMRC_2512Miller Gold Mine · goldGrade: 1.51Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MMRC_2512
- Project
- Miller Gold Mine
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_mt
- Reported Region
- usa_mt
- Ticker
- TCO
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.51
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 120.4 m
- To
- 121.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 120.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MMRC_2512:120.4-121.9
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Christofferson Laboratory
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, umpire
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept confirms mineralization in the maiden drill program, but the gold grade is moderate for an orogenic deposit, and true width is not disclosed.
Positive factors
- Intercept confirms mineralization in a maiden drill program.
Negative factors
- Grade is moderate for an orogenic gold deposit.
- True width of mineralization is unknown.
Evidence · table
“1.51”
Context: 1.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Section on Hole 14 at the Miller Mine in Montana (see Appendix A also) To view an enhanced version of this graphic, plea"
MMRC_2512Miller Gold Mine · silverGrade: 9.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MMRC_2512
- Project
- Miller Gold Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_mt
- Reported Region
- usa_mt
- Ticker
- TCO
Geometry
- Grade
- 9.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 120.4 m
- To
- 121.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 120.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MMRC_2512:120.4-121.9
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Christofferson Laboratory
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, umpire
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept confirms mineralization in the maiden drill program, but the silver grade is moderate, and true width is not disclosed.
Positive factors
- Intercept confirms mineralization in a maiden drill program.
Negative factors
- Silver grade is moderate.
- True width of mineralization is unknown.
Evidence · table
“9.60”
Context: 1.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Section on Hole 14 at the Miller Mine in Montana (see Appendix A also) To view an enhanced version of this graphic, plea"
MMRC_2512Miller Gold Mine · goldGrade: 1.65Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MMRC_2512
- Project
- Miller Gold Mine
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_mt
- Reported Region
- usa_mt
- Ticker
- TCO
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.65
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 134.1 m
- To
- 135.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 120.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MMRC_2512:134.1-135.6
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Christofferson Laboratory
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, umpire
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept confirms mineralization in the maiden drill program, but the gold grade is moderate for an orogenic deposit, and true width is not disclosed.
Positive factors
- Intercept confirms mineralization in a maiden drill program.
Negative factors
- Grade is moderate for an orogenic gold deposit.
- True width of mineralization is unknown.
Evidence · table
“1.65”
Context: 1.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Section on Hole 14 at the Miller Mine in Montana (see Appendix A also) To view an enhanced version of this graphic, plea"
MMRC_2512Miller Gold Mine · silverGrade: 7.54Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MMRC_2512
- Project
- Miller Gold Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_mt
- Reported Region
- usa_mt
- Ticker
- TCO
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.54
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 134.1 m
- To
- 135.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 120.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MMRC_2512:134.1-135.6
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Christofferson Laboratory
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, umpire
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept confirms mineralization in the maiden drill program, but the silver grade is moderate, and true width is not disclosed.
Positive factors
- Intercept confirms mineralization in a maiden drill program.
Negative factors
- Silver grade is moderate.
- True width of mineralization is unknown.
Evidence · table
“7.54”
Context: 1.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Section on Hole 14 at the Miller Mine in Montana (see Appendix A also) To view an enhanced version of this graphic, plea"
MMRC_2512Miller Gold Mine · goldGrade: 1.03Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MMRC_2512
- Project
- Miller Gold Mine
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_mt
- Reported Region
- usa_mt
- Ticker
- TCO
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.03
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 140.2 m
- To
- 141.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 120.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MMRC_2512:140.2-141.7
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Christofferson Laboratory
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, umpire
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept confirms mineralization in the maiden drill program, but the gold grade is moderate for an orogenic deposit, and true width is not disclosed.
Positive factors
- Intercept confirms mineralization in a maiden drill program.
Negative factors
- Grade is moderate for an orogenic gold deposit.
- True width of mineralization is unknown.
Evidence · table
“1.03”
Context: 1.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Section on Hole 14 at the Miller Mine in Montana (see Appendix A also) To view an enhanced version of this graphic, plea"
MMRC_2512Miller Gold Mine · silverGrade: 6.17Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MMRC_2512
- Project
- Miller Gold Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_mt
- Reported Region
- usa_mt
- Ticker
- TCO
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.17
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 140.2 m
- To
- 141.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 120.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MMRC_2512:140.2-141.7
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Christofferson Laboratory
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, umpire
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept confirms mineralization in the maiden drill program, but the silver grade is moderate, and true width is not disclosed.
Positive factors
- Intercept confirms mineralization in a maiden drill program.
Negative factors
- Silver grade is moderate.
- True width of mineralization is unknown.
Evidence · table
“6.17”
Context: 1.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Section on Hole 14 at the Miller Mine in Montana (see Appendix A also) To view an enhanced version of this graphic, plea"
MMRC_2513Miller Gold Mine · goldGrade: 1.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MMRC_2513
- Project
- Miller Gold Mine
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_mt
- Reported Region
- usa_mt
- Ticker
- TCO
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 135.6 m
- To
- 137.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 135.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MMRC_2513:135.6-137.1
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Christofferson Laboratory
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, umpire
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept confirms mineralization in the maiden drill program, but the gold grade is moderate for an orogenic deposit, and true width is not disclosed.
Positive factors
- Intercept confirms mineralization in a maiden drill program.
Negative factors
- Grade is moderate for an orogenic gold deposit.
- True width of mineralization is unknown.
Evidence · table
“1.10”
Context: 1.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Section on Hole 14 at the Miller Mine in Montana (see Appendix A also) To view an enhanced version of this graphic, plea"
MMRC_2513Miller Gold Mine · silverGrade: 5.14Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MMRC_2513
- Project
- Miller Gold Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_mt
- Reported Region
- usa_mt
- Ticker
- TCO
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.14
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 135.6 m
- To
- 137.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 135.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MMRC_2513:135.6-137.1
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Christofferson Laboratory
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, umpire
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept confirms mineralization in the maiden drill program, but the silver grade is weak, and true width is not disclosed.
Positive factors
- Intercept confirms mineralization in a maiden drill program.
Negative factors
- Silver grade is weak.
- True width of mineralization is unknown.
Evidence · table
“5.14”
Context: 1.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Section on Hole 14 at the Miller Mine in Montana (see Appendix A also) To view an enhanced version of this graphic, plea"
MMRC_2514Miller Gold Mine · goldGrade: 6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MMRC_2514
- Project
- Miller Gold Mine
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_mt
- Reported Region
- usa_mt
- Ticker
- TCO
Geometry
- Grade
- 6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 13.7 m
- To
- 15.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 13.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MMRC_2514:13.7-15.2
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Christofferson Laboratory
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, umpire
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows an exceptional gold grade and extends mineralization to the south, but true width is not disclosed.
Positive factors
- Exceptional gold grade for an orogenic deposit.
- Intercept extends mineralization 150 meters to the south.
Negative factors
- True width of mineralization is unknown.
Evidence · table
“6.00”
Context: 1.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Section on Hole 14 at the Miller Mine in Montana (see Appendix A also) To view an enhanced version of this graphic, plea"
MMRC_2514Miller Gold Mine · silverGrade: 13.71Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MMRC_2514
- Project
- Miller Gold Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_mt
- Reported Region
- usa_mt
- Ticker
- TCO
Geometry
- Grade
- 13.71
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 13.7 m
- To
- 15.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 13.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MMRC_2514:13.7-15.2
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Christofferson Laboratory
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, umpire
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a strong silver grade and extends mineralization to the south, but true width is not disclosed.
Positive factors
- Strong silver grade.
- Intercept extends mineralization 150 meters to the south.
Negative factors
- True width of mineralization is unknown.
Evidence · table
“13.71”
Context: 1.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Section on Hole 14 at the Miller Mine in Montana (see Appendix A also) To view an enhanced version of this graphic, plea"
MMRC_2514Miller Gold Mine · goldGrade: 2.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MMRC_2514
- Project
- Miller Gold Mine
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_mt
- Reported Region
- usa_mt
- Ticker
- TCO
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 15.2 m
- To
- 18.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 13.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MMRC_2514:15.2-18.2
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Christofferson Laboratory
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, umpire
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept confirms mineralization with a moderate gold grade and extends it to the south, but true width is not disclosed.
Positive factors
- Moderate gold grade for an orogenic deposit.
- Intercept extends mineralization 150 meters to the south.
Negative factors
- True width of mineralization is unknown.
Evidence · table
“2.30”
Context: 3.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Section on Hole 14 at the Miller Mine in Montana (see Appendix A also) To view an enhanced version of this graphic, plea"
MMRC_2514Miller Gold Mine · silverGrade: 8.57Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MMRC_2514
- Project
- Miller Gold Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_mt
- Reported Region
- usa_mt
- Ticker
- TCO
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.57
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 15.2 m
- To
- 18.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 13.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MMRC_2514:15.2-18.2
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Christofferson Laboratory
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, umpire
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept confirms mineralization with a moderate silver grade and extends it to the south, but true width is not disclosed.
Positive factors
- Intercept confirms mineralization and extends it to the south.
Negative factors
- Silver grade is moderate.
- True width of mineralization is unknown.
Evidence · table
“8.57”
Context: 3.0
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Section on Hole 14 at the Miller Mine in Montana (see Appendix A also) To view an enhanced version of this graphic, plea"
MMRC_2523Miller Gold Mine · goldGrade: 5.49Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MMRC_2523
- Project
- Miller Gold Mine
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_mt
- Reported Region
- usa_mt
- Ticker
- TCO
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.49
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 1.5 m
- To
- 3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MMRC_2523:1.5-3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Waste dump
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Christofferson Laboratory
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, umpire
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows an exceptional gold grade from a waste dump, suggesting potential for additional resources, but true width is not disclosed.
Positive factors
- Exceptional gold grade from a waste dump, indicating potential for reprocessing or additional resources.
- Intercept confirms mineralization in a maiden drill program.
Negative factors
- True width of mineralization is unknown.
Evidence · table
“5.49”
Context: 1.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Section on Hole 14 at the Miller Mine in Montana (see Appendix A also) To view an enhanced version of this graphic, plea"
MMRC_2523Miller Gold Mine · silverGrade: 18.86Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MMRC_2523
- Project
- Miller Gold Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_mt
- Reported Region
- usa_mt
- Ticker
- TCO
Geometry
- Grade
- 18.86
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 1.5 m
- To
- 3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MMRC_2523:1.5-3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Waste dump
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Christofferson Laboratory
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, umpire
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a strong silver grade from a waste dump, suggesting potential for additional resources, but true width is not disclosed.
Positive factors
- Strong silver grade from a waste dump, indicating potential for reprocessing or additional resources.
- Intercept confirms mineralization in a maiden drill program.
Negative factors
- True width of mineralization is unknown.
Evidence · table
“18.86”
Context: 1.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Section on Hole 14 at the Miller Mine in Montana (see Appendix A also) To view an enhanced version of this graphic, plea"
Fact 47Miller Gold Mine · goldGrade: 370Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Miller Gold Mine
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_mt
- Reported Region
- Montana, USA
- Ticker
- TCO
Geometry
- Grade
- 370
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- True Width
- 0.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Christofferson Laboratory
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, umpire
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This surface sample shows a bonanza gold grade with true width disclosed, indicating exceptional high-grade mineralization at the project.
Positive factors
- Bonanza gold grade from a surface sample, indicating very high-grade mineralization.
- True width is explicitly stated, increasing confidence in the reported thickness.
Evidence · text
“0.5 metres true width at 370 g/t Au and 270 g/t Ag sample # 2021543552”
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.5
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Section on Hole 14 at the Miller Mine in Montana (see Appendix A also) To view an enhanced version of this graphic, plea"
Fact 48Miller Gold Mine · silverGrade: 270Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Miller Gold Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_mt
- Reported Region
- Montana, USA
- Ticker
- TCO
Geometry
- Grade
- 270
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- True Width
- 0.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Christofferson Laboratory
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, umpire
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Dilution Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This surface sample shows an exceptional silver grade with true width disclosed, indicating very high-grade mineralization at the project.
Positive factors
- Exceptional silver grade from a surface sample, indicating very high-grade mineralization.
- True width is explicitly stated, increasing confidence in the reported thickness.
Evidence · text
“0.5 metres true width at 370 g/t Au and 270 g/t Ag sample # 2021543552”
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 0.5
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Section on Hole 14 at the Miller Mine in Montana (see Appendix A also) To view an enhanced version of this graphic, plea"
MMRC_2523 Waste dumpMiller Gold Mine · goldGrade: 5.49Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MMRC_2523 Waste dump
- Project
- Miller Gold Mine
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_mt
- Reported Region
- usa_mt
- Ticker
- TCO
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.49
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 1.5 m
- To
- 3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MMRC_2523 Waste dump:1.5-3
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Christofferson Laboratory
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, umpire
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.49 g/t gold is moderate against the underground mining band [15, 7, 4, 2.5] g/t. Grade×width 8.2 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.49”
Context: MMRC_2523 Waste dump
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Section on Hole 14 at the Miller Mine in Montana (see Appendix A also) To view an enhanced version of this graphic, plea"
MMRC_2523 Waste dumpMiller Gold Mine · silverGrade: 18.86Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- MMRC_2523 Waste dump
- Project
- Miller Gold Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_mt
- Reported Region
- usa_mt
- Ticker
- TCO
Geometry
- Grade
- 18.86
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 1.5 m
- To
- 3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- MMRC_2523 Waste dump:1.5-3
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Christofferson Laboratory
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, umpire
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-23T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 18.86 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 28.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 18.86 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“18.86”
Context: MMRC_2523 Waste dump
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Section on Hole 14 at the Miller Mine in Montana (see Appendix A also) To view an enhanced version of this graphic, plea"
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.