Transatlantic Samples 36.1% Cu over 2.6 metres at Monitor Project - Big Elk Prospect

Original announcement by tmx on

Company
Transatlantic Mining Corp.
Ticker
TCO
Exchange
TSX
Region
Idaho, USA
Primary commodity
Copper
Secondary commodities
Gold, Silver
Document categories
Drill results, Other
Extracted
2026-09-13 03:02:54 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Transatlantic Mining reported high-grade copper surface samples at the Big Elk prospect, including an outcrop assay of 36.1% Cu over 2.6m. While recent drilling confirmed the geometry of known structures and historical workings, it did not intersect new mineralized material.

Reasoning: High-grade surface intercepts provide significant prospectivity, though the recent drill program was focused on structural validation rather than new mineralized discovery.

Positive factors

  • High-grade surface samples (36.1% Cu)
  • QA/QC protocols and lab names disclosed
  • QP sign-off provided

Negative factors

  • Drilling did not intersect new vein material
  • Drilling results are non-analytical (targeting voids/geometry)

Facts used in scoring: 9

Classification and evidence

Bonanza Interceptpositive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Why it applies: 36.1% Cu is an exceptionally high-grade copper intercept.

Evidence · table

“36.1”

Context: 2.6

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: Release mentions analytical procedures adhered to industry-standard protocols and passed internal checks.

Evidence · text

“All analytical procedures adhered to industry-standard protocols, and results have passed internal QA/QC checks.”

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 9. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (9)

Fact 1Monitor Project · copperGrade: 36.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Monitor Project
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_id
Reported Region
Idaho, USA
Ticker
TCO

Geometry

Grade
36.1
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.6 m
True Width
2.4 m
From
0 m
To
2.6 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel
Group ID
MON_231019_1:0-2.6

Location

Location
Big Elk
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Analytical Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-07-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: 36.1% Cu is an exceptional grade for a copper project.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional copper grade

Evidence · table

“36.1”

Context: 2.6

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 2.4

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: 36.1% Cu is an exceptionally high-grade copper intercept.

Evidence · table

“36.1”

Context: 2.6

QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Reason: Release mentions analytical procedures adhered to industry-standard protocols and passed internal checks.

Evidence · text

“All analytical procedures adhered to industry-standard protocols, and results have passed internal QA/QC checks.”
Fact 2Monitor Project · goldGrade: 0.93Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Monitor Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_id
Reported Region
Idaho, USA
Ticker
TCO

Geometry

Grade
0.93
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.6 m
True Width
2.4 m
From
0 m
To
2.6 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel
Group ID
MON_231019_1:0-2.6

Location

Location
Big Elk
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Analytical Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-07-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Gold grade is present as a byproduct in a high-grade copper sample.

Evidence · table

“0.93”

Context: 2.6

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 2.4

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Fact 3Monitor Project · silverGrade: 29.55Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Monitor Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_id
Reported Region
Idaho, USA
Ticker
TCO

Geometry

Grade
29.55
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.6 m
True Width
2.4 m
From
0 m
To
2.6 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Sample Type
channel
Group ID
MON_231019_1:0-2.6

Location

Location
Big Elk
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Analytical Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-07-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Silver grade is present as a byproduct in a high-grade copper sample.

Evidence · table

“29.55”

Context: 2.6

Tags used in scoring

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: true_width_m is 2.4

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Fact 4Monitor Project · copperGrade: 6.6Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Monitor Project
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_id
Reported Region
Idaho, USA
Ticker
TCO

Geometry

Grade
6.6
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Big Elk
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Analytical Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-07-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: 6.6% Cu is a strong grade for a surface sample, though selectivity is noted.

Positive factors

  • Strong copper grade in gossan

Negative factors

  • Surface grab sample selectivity

Evidence · table

“6.6”

Context: N/A

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Fact 5Monitor Project · goldGrade: 0.14Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Monitor Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_id
Reported Region
Idaho, USA
Ticker
TCO

Geometry

Grade
0.14
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Big Elk
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Analytical Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-07-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Low gold grade in surface sample.

Evidence · table

“0.14”

Context: N/A

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Fact 6Monitor Project · silverGrade: 5.1Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Monitor Project
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_id
Reported Region
Idaho, USA
Ticker
TCO

Geometry

Grade
5.1
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Big Elk
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
American Analytical Laboratories
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-07-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Low silver grade in surface sample.

Evidence · table

“5.1”

Context: N/A

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

MON_231019_1Monitor · copperGrade: 36.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MON_231019_1
Project
Monitor
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_id
Reported Region
usa_id
Ticker
TCO

Geometry

Grade
36.1
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.6 m
From
0 m
To
2.6 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MON_231019_1:0-2.6

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-07-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 36.1 % copper is exceptional against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 93.9 %·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 36.1 % copper is exceptional on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“36.1”

Context: MON_231019_1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

MON_231019_1Monitor · goldGrade: 0.93Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MON_231019_1
Project
Monitor
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_id
Reported Region
usa_id
Ticker
TCO

Geometry

Grade
0.93
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.6 m
From
0 m
To
2.6 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MON_231019_1:0-2.6

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-07-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.93 g/t gold is weak against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 2.4 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.93”

Context: MON_231019_1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

MON_231019_1Monitor · silverGrade: 29.55Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MON_231019_1
Project
Monitor
Commodity
silver
Region
usa_id
Reported Region
usa_id
Ticker
TCO

Geometry

Grade
29.55
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.6 m
From
0 m
To
2.6 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MON_231019_1:0-2.6

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-07-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 29.55 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 76.8 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 29.55 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“29.55”

Context: MON_231019_1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.