Triumph Gold Announces the Acquisition of the Coyote Knoll Silver-Gold Mineral Property - Located in Central Utah
Original announcement by tmx on
- Company
- Triumph Gold Corp.
- Ticker
- TIG
- Exchange
- TSX
- Region
- central Utah
- Primary commodity
- Silver
- Secondary commodities
- Gold, Arsenic, Copper, Lead, Antimony, Zinc
- Document categories
- Drill results, Agreement transaction, Other
- Extracted
- 2026-09-15 03:11:38 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Triumph Gold Corp. has announced the acquisition of the Coyote Knoll Silver-Gold Property in central Utah for $150,000 USD and 4 million common shares. The property boasts significant historical drill results, including 3.00 metres at 1350.36 g/t Ag and 3.86 g/t Au, and high-grade historical rock samples up to 6,730.00 g/t Ag and 23.30 g/t Au. While the acquisition expands Triumph Gold's portfolio into a mining-friendly region with confirmed epithermal mineralization, the historical data has not been verified to current NI 43-101 standards and requires further exploration.
Reasoning: Triumph Gold acquired the Coyote Knoll Silver-Gold property, which shows high-grade historical drill and surface sample results, expanding the company's portfolio into a new, historically significant region. However, the historical data has not been verified to current NI 43-101 standards, leading to a medium confidence in the reported historical values.
Positive factors
- High-grade historical silver and gold results
- Strategic acquisition in a mining-friendly and historically significant region
- Confirmed epithermal mineralization and potential for further discovery
- QP/CP signed off on the technical content of the news release
Negative factors
- Historical data not verified to current NI 43-101 standards
- Grab samples may not represent true underlying mineralization
- Bulk sample and dore production not verified for accuracy or quality control
- True width not stated for historical drill intercepts
Facts used in scoring: 30
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 22. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (22)
AT1-C6Coyote Knoll · silverGrade: 1350.36Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AT1-C6
- Project
- Coyote Knoll
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- usa_ut
- Ticker
- TIG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1350.36
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 54.1 m
- To
- 57.1 m
- Hole Depth
- 75 m
- Intercept Depth
- 54.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- AT1-C6:54.1-57.1
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 367897
- Northing
- 4408436
- Elevation
- 1621 m
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 25
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Ag
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 1 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-06-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows bonanza-grade silver over a moderate width, indicating significant mineralization, but its historical nature and lack of verification reduce confidence.
Positive factors
- Exceptionally high-grade silver intercept
Negative factors
- Historical data not verified to current NI 43-101 standards
- True width not stated
Evidence · table
“1350.36”
Context: 3.00
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Company owns 100% of the Big Creek and Tad/Toro gold-silver-copper properties situated along strike of the Freegold "
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Reason: 1350.36 g/t Ag is exceptionally high grade, well above the 500 g/t exceptional threshold for silver.
Evidence · table
“1350.36”
Context: 3.00
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This is a historical drill result re-announced without new assays or reinterpretation.
Evidence · text
“Highlights from historical drilling are summarized in Table 1 & 2”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The interval is given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.
Evidence · table
“3.00”
Context: 54.10
Cut-off DisclosedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Reason: The cut-off grade of 25 g/t Ag used for compositing is clearly stated.
Evidence · text
“>25 g/t Ag cutoff”
AT1-C6Coyote Knoll · goldGrade: 3.86Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AT1-C6
- Project
- Coyote Knoll
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- usa_ut
- Ticker
- TIG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.86
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 54.1 m
- To
- 57.1 m
- Hole Depth
- 75 m
- Intercept Depth
- 54.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- AT1-C6:54.1-57.1
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 367897
- Northing
- 4408436
- Elevation
- 1621 m
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 25
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Ag
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 1 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-06-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows strong gold grades over a moderate width, indicating significant mineralization, but its historical nature and lack of verification reduce confidence.
Positive factors
- High-grade gold intercept
Negative factors
- Historical data not verified to current NI 43-101 standards
- True width not stated
Evidence · table
“3.86”
Context: 3.00
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Company owns 100% of the Big Creek and Tad/Toro gold-silver-copper properties situated along strike of the Freegold "
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Reason: 3.86 g/t Au is strong grade for gold, especially in an epithermal context.
Evidence · table
“3.86”
Context: 3.00
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This is a historical drill result re-announced without new assays or reinterpretation.
Evidence · text
“Highlights from historical drilling are summarized in Table 1 & 2”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The interval is given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.
Evidence · table
“3.00”
Context: 54.10
Cut-off DisclosedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Reason: The cut-off grade of 25 g/t Ag used for compositing is clearly stated.
Evidence · text
“>25 g/t Ag cutoff”
CK-10Coyote Knoll · silverGrade: 114.84Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CK-10
- Project
- Coyote Knoll
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- usa_ut
- Ticker
- TIG
Geometry
- Grade
- 114.84
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.1 m
- From
- 68.6 m
- To
- 74.7 m
- Hole Depth
- 110 m
- Intercept Depth
- 68.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CK-10:68.6-74.7
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 367951
- Northing
- 4408442
- Elevation
- 1624 m
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 25
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Ag
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 1 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-06-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows moderate-grade silver over a good width, indicating mineralization, but its historical nature and lack of verification reduce confidence.
Positive factors
- Moderate-grade silver intercept over good width
Negative factors
- Historical data not verified to current NI 43-101 standards
- True width not stated
Evidence · table
“114.84”
Context: 6.10
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Company owns 100% of the Big Creek and Tad/Toro gold-silver-copper properties situated along strike of the Freegold "
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This is a historical drill result re-announced without new assays or reinterpretation.
Evidence · text
“Highlights from historical drilling are summarized in Table 1 & 2”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The interval is given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.
Evidence · table
“6.10”
Context: 68.60
Cut-off DisclosedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Reason: The cut-off grade of 25 g/t Ag used for compositing is clearly stated.
Evidence · text
“>25 g/t Ag cutoff”
CK-10Coyote Knoll · goldGrade: 0.12Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CK-10
- Project
- Coyote Knoll
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- usa_ut
- Ticker
- TIG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.12
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.1 m
- From
- 68.6 m
- To
- 74.7 m
- Hole Depth
- 110 m
- Intercept Depth
- 68.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CK-10:68.6-74.7
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 367951
- Northing
- 4408442
- Elevation
- 1624 m
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 25
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Ag
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 1 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-06-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows low gold grades over a good width, but its historical nature and lack of verification reduce confidence.
Negative factors
- Low gold grade
- Historical data not verified to current NI 43-101 standards
- True width not stated
Evidence · table
“0.12”
Context: 6.10
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Company owns 100% of the Big Creek and Tad/Toro gold-silver-copper properties situated along strike of the Freegold "
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This is a historical drill result re-announced without new assays or reinterpretation.
Evidence · text
“Highlights from historical drilling are summarized in Table 1 & 2”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The interval is given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.
Evidence · table
“6.10”
Context: 68.60
Cut-off DisclosedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Reason: The cut-off grade of 25 g/t Ag used for compositing is clearly stated.
Evidence · text
“>25 g/t Ag cutoff”
AT1-C5Coyote Knoll · silverGrade: 99.37Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AT1-C5
- Project
- Coyote Knoll
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- usa_ut
- Ticker
- TIG
Geometry
- Grade
- 99.37
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.5 m
- From
- 49.8 m
- To
- 54.3 m
- Hole Depth
- 76 m
- Intercept Depth
- 49.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- AT1-C5:49.8-54.3
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 367889
- Northing
- 4408432
- Elevation
- 1622 m
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 25
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Ag
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 1 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-06-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows moderate-grade silver over a good width, indicating mineralization, but its historical nature and lack of verification reduce confidence.
Positive factors
- Moderate-grade silver intercept
Negative factors
- Historical data not verified to current NI 43-101 standards
- True width not stated
Evidence · table
“99.37”
Context: 4.50
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Company owns 100% of the Big Creek and Tad/Toro gold-silver-copper properties situated along strike of the Freegold "
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This is a historical drill result re-announced without new assays or reinterpretation.
Evidence · text
“Highlights from historical drilling are summarized in Table 1 & 2”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The interval is given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.
Evidence · table
“4.50”
Context: 49.80
Cut-off DisclosedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Reason: The cut-off grade of 25 g/t Ag used for compositing is clearly stated.
Evidence · text
“>25 g/t Ag cutoff”
AT1-C5Coyote Knoll · goldGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AT1-C5
- Project
- Coyote Knoll
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- usa_ut
- Ticker
- TIG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.5 m
- From
- 49.8 m
- To
- 54.3 m
- Hole Depth
- 76 m
- Intercept Depth
- 49.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- AT1-C5:49.8-54.3
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 367889
- Northing
- 4408432
- Elevation
- 1622 m
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 25
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Ag
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 1 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-06-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows low gold grades over a good width, but its historical nature and lack of verification reduce confidence.
Negative factors
- Low gold grade
- Historical data not verified to current NI 43-101 standards
- True width not stated
Evidence · table
“0.40”
Context: 4.50
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Company owns 100% of the Big Creek and Tad/Toro gold-silver-copper properties situated along strike of the Freegold "
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This is a historical drill result re-announced without new assays or reinterpretation.
Evidence · text
“Highlights from historical drilling are summarized in Table 1 & 2”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The interval is given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.
Evidence · table
“4.50”
Context: 49.80
Cut-off DisclosedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Reason: The cut-off grade of 25 g/t Ag used for compositing is clearly stated.
Evidence · text
“>25 g/t Ag cutoff”
CK-1Coyote Knoll · silverGrade: 68.89Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CK-1
- Project
- Coyote Knoll
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- usa_ut
- Ticker
- TIG
Geometry
- Grade
- 68.89
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.6 m
- From
- 27.4 m
- To
- 32 m
- Hole Depth
- 80 m
- Intercept Depth
- 27.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CK-1:27.4-32
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 367904
- Northing
- 4408411
- Elevation
- 1613 m
- Azimuth
- 170 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 25
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Ag
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 1 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-06-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows moderate-grade silver over a good width, indicating mineralization, but its historical nature and lack of verification reduce confidence.
Positive factors
- Moderate-grade silver intercept
Negative factors
- Historical data not verified to current NI 43-101 standards
- True width not stated
Evidence · table
“68.89”
Context: 4.60
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Company owns 100% of the Big Creek and Tad/Toro gold-silver-copper properties situated along strike of the Freegold "
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This is a historical drill result re-announced without new assays or reinterpretation.
Evidence · text
“Highlights from historical drilling are summarized in Table 1 & 2”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The interval is given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.
Evidence · table
“4.60”
Context: 27.40
Cut-off DisclosedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Reason: The cut-off grade of 25 g/t Ag used for compositing is clearly stated.
Evidence · text
“>25 g/t Ag cutoff”
CK-1Coyote Knoll · goldGrade: 0.09Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CK-1
- Project
- Coyote Knoll
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- usa_ut
- Ticker
- TIG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.09
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.6 m
- From
- 27.4 m
- To
- 32 m
- Hole Depth
- 80 m
- Intercept Depth
- 27.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CK-1:27.4-32
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 367904
- Northing
- 4408411
- Elevation
- 1613 m
- Azimuth
- 170 °
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 25
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Ag
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 1 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-06-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows low gold grades over a good width, but its historical nature and lack of verification reduce confidence.
Negative factors
- Low gold grade
- Historical data not verified to current NI 43-101 standards
- True width not stated
Evidence · table
“0.09”
Context: 4.60
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Company owns 100% of the Big Creek and Tad/Toro gold-silver-copper properties situated along strike of the Freegold "
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This is a historical drill result re-announced without new assays or reinterpretation.
Evidence · text
“Highlights from historical drilling are summarized in Table 1 & 2”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The interval is given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.
Evidence · table
“4.60”
Context: 27.40
Cut-off DisclosedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Reason: The cut-off grade of 25 g/t Ag used for compositing is clearly stated.
Evidence · text
“>25 g/t Ag cutoff”
CK-10Coyote Knoll · silverGrade: 67.81Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CK-10
- Project
- Coyote Knoll
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- usa_ut
- Ticker
- TIG
Geometry
- Grade
- 67.81
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.1 m
- From
- 51.8 m
- To
- 54.9 m
- Hole Depth
- 110 m
- Intercept Depth
- 51.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CK-10:51.8-54.9
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 367951
- Northing
- 4408442
- Elevation
- 1624 m
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 25
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Ag
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 1 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-06-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows moderate-grade silver over a narrow width, indicating mineralization, but its historical nature and lack of verification reduce confidence.
Positive factors
- Moderate-grade silver intercept
Negative factors
- Historical data not verified to current NI 43-101 standards
- True width not stated
Evidence · table
“67.81”
Context: 3.10
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Company owns 100% of the Big Creek and Tad/Toro gold-silver-copper properties situated along strike of the Freegold "
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This is a historical drill result re-announced without new assays or reinterpretation.
Evidence · text
“Highlights from historical drilling are summarized in Table 1 & 2”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The interval is given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.
Evidence · table
“3.10”
Context: 51.80
Cut-off DisclosedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Reason: The cut-off grade of 25 g/t Ag used for compositing is clearly stated.
Evidence · text
“>25 g/t Ag cutoff”
CK-10Coyote Knoll · goldGrade: 0.38Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CK-10
- Project
- Coyote Knoll
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- usa_ut
- Ticker
- TIG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.38
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.1 m
- From
- 51.8 m
- To
- 54.9 m
- Hole Depth
- 110 m
- Intercept Depth
- 51.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CK-10:51.8-54.9
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 367951
- Northing
- 4408442
- Elevation
- 1624 m
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 25
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Ag
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 1 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-06-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows low gold grades over a narrow width, but its historical nature and lack of verification reduce confidence.
Negative factors
- Low gold grade
- Historical data not verified to current NI 43-101 standards
- True width not stated
Evidence · table
“0.38”
Context: 3.10
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Company owns 100% of the Big Creek and Tad/Toro gold-silver-copper properties situated along strike of the Freegold "
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This is a historical drill result re-announced without new assays or reinterpretation.
Evidence · text
“Highlights from historical drilling are summarized in Table 1 & 2”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The interval is given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.
Evidence · table
“3.10”
Context: 51.80
Cut-off DisclosedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Reason: The cut-off grade of 25 g/t Ag used for compositing is clearly stated.
Evidence · text
“>25 g/t Ag cutoff”
CK-10Coyote Knoll · silverGrade: 38.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CK-10
- Project
- Coyote Knoll
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- usa_ut
- Ticker
- TIG
Geometry
- Grade
- 38.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 61 m
- To
- 64 m
- Hole Depth
- 110 m
- Intercept Depth
- 61 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CK-10:61-64
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 367951
- Northing
- 4408442
- Elevation
- 1624 m
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 25
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Ag
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 1 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-06-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows moderate-grade silver over a narrow width, indicating mineralization, but its historical nature and lack of verification reduce confidence.
Positive factors
- Moderate-grade silver intercept
Negative factors
- Historical data not verified to current NI 43-101 standards
- True width not stated
Evidence · table
“38.50”
Context: 3.00
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Company owns 100% of the Big Creek and Tad/Toro gold-silver-copper properties situated along strike of the Freegold "
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This is a historical drill result re-announced without new assays or reinterpretation.
Evidence · text
“Highlights from historical drilling are summarized in Table 1 & 2”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The interval is given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.
Evidence · table
“3.00”
Context: 61.00
Cut-off DisclosedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Reason: The cut-off grade of 25 g/t Ag used for compositing is clearly stated.
Evidence · text
“>25 g/t Ag cutoff”
CK-10Coyote Knoll · goldGrade: 0.08Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CK-10
- Project
- Coyote Knoll
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- usa_ut
- Ticker
- TIG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.08
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 61 m
- To
- 64 m
- Hole Depth
- 110 m
- Intercept Depth
- 61 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CK-10:61-64
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 367951
- Northing
- 4408442
- Elevation
- 1624 m
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 25
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Ag
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 1 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-06-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows low gold grades over a narrow width, but its historical nature and lack of verification reduce confidence.
Negative factors
- Low gold grade
- Historical data not verified to current NI 43-101 standards
- True width not stated
Evidence · table
“0.08”
Context: 3.00
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Company owns 100% of the Big Creek and Tad/Toro gold-silver-copper properties situated along strike of the Freegold "
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This is a historical drill result re-announced without new assays or reinterpretation.
Evidence · text
“Highlights from historical drilling are summarized in Table 1 & 2”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The interval is given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.
Evidence · table
“3.00”
Context: 61.00
Cut-off DisclosedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Reason: The cut-off grade of 25 g/t Ag used for compositing is clearly stated.
Evidence · text
“>25 g/t Ag cutoff”
CK-2Coyote Knoll · silverGrade: 60Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CK-2
- Project
- Coyote Knoll
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- usa_ut
- Ticker
- TIG
Geometry
- Grade
- 60
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 36.6 m
- To
- 39.6 m
- Hole Depth
- 87 m
- Intercept Depth
- 36.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CK-2:36.6-39.6
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 367910
- Northing
- 4408421
- Elevation
- 1616 m
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 25
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Ag
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 1 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-06-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows moderate-grade silver over a narrow width, indicating mineralization, but its historical nature and lack of verification reduce confidence.
Positive factors
- Moderate-grade silver intercept
Negative factors
- Historical data not verified to current NI 43-101 standards
- True width not stated
Evidence · table
“60.00”
Context: 3.00
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Company owns 100% of the Big Creek and Tad/Toro gold-silver-copper properties situated along strike of the Freegold "
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This is a historical drill result re-announced without new assays or reinterpretation.
Evidence · text
“Highlights from historical drilling are summarized in Table 1 & 2”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The interval is given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.
Evidence · table
“3.00”
Context: 36.60
Cut-off DisclosedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Reason: The cut-off grade of 25 g/t Ag used for compositing is clearly stated.
Evidence · text
“>25 g/t Ag cutoff”
CK-2Coyote Knoll · goldGrade: 0.18Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CK-2
- Project
- Coyote Knoll
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- usa_ut
- Ticker
- TIG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.18
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 36.6 m
- To
- 39.6 m
- Hole Depth
- 87 m
- Intercept Depth
- 36.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CK-2:36.6-39.6
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 367910
- Northing
- 4408421
- Elevation
- 1616 m
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 25
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Ag
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 1 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-06-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows low gold grades over a narrow width, but its historical nature and lack of verification reduce confidence.
Negative factors
- Low gold grade
- Historical data not verified to current NI 43-101 standards
- True width not stated
Evidence · table
“0.18”
Context: 3.00
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Company owns 100% of the Big Creek and Tad/Toro gold-silver-copper properties situated along strike of the Freegold "
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This is a historical drill result re-announced without new assays or reinterpretation.
Evidence · text
“Highlights from historical drilling are summarized in Table 1 & 2”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The interval is given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.
Evidence · table
“3.00”
Context: 36.60
Cut-off DisclosedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Reason: The cut-off grade of 25 g/t Ag used for compositing is clearly stated.
Evidence · text
“>25 g/t Ag cutoff”
CK-2Coyote Knoll · silverGrade: 39.04Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CK-2
- Project
- Coyote Knoll
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- usa_ut
- Ticker
- TIG
Geometry
- Grade
- 39.04
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.6 m
- From
- 53.3 m
- To
- 57.9 m
- Hole Depth
- 87 m
- Intercept Depth
- 53.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CK-2:53.3-57.9
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 367910
- Northing
- 4408421
- Elevation
- 1616 m
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 25
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Ag
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 1 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-06-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows moderate-grade silver over a good width, indicating mineralization, but its historical nature and lack of verification reduce confidence.
Positive factors
- Moderate-grade silver intercept
Negative factors
- Historical data not verified to current NI 43-101 standards
- True width not stated
Evidence · table
“39.04”
Context: 4.60
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Company owns 100% of the Big Creek and Tad/Toro gold-silver-copper properties situated along strike of the Freegold "
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This is a historical drill result re-announced without new assays or reinterpretation.
Evidence · text
“Highlights from historical drilling are summarized in Table 1 & 2”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The interval is given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.
Evidence · table
“4.60”
Context: 53.30
Cut-off DisclosedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Reason: The cut-off grade of 25 g/t Ag used for compositing is clearly stated.
Evidence · text
“>25 g/t Ag cutoff”
CK-2Coyote Knoll · goldGrade: 0.09Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CK-2
- Project
- Coyote Knoll
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- usa_ut
- Ticker
- TIG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.09
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.6 m
- From
- 53.3 m
- To
- 57.9 m
- Hole Depth
- 87 m
- Intercept Depth
- 53.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CK-2:53.3-57.9
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Easting
- 367910
- Northing
- 4408421
- Elevation
- 1616 m
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 25
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Ag
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 1 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-06-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows low gold grades over a good width, but its historical nature and lack of verification reduce confidence.
Negative factors
- Low gold grade
- Historical data not verified to current NI 43-101 standards
- True width not stated
Evidence · table
“0.09”
Context: 4.60
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Company owns 100% of the Big Creek and Tad/Toro gold-silver-copper properties situated along strike of the Freegold "
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This is a historical drill result re-announced without new assays or reinterpretation.
Evidence · text
“Highlights from historical drilling are summarized in Table 1 & 2”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The interval is given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.
Evidence · table
“4.60”
Context: 53.30
Cut-off DisclosedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Reason: The cut-off grade of 25 g/t Ag used for compositing is clearly stated.
Evidence · text
“>25 g/t Ag cutoff”
CK-15Coyote Knoll · silverGrade: 40.39Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CK-15
- Project
- Coyote Knoll
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- usa_ut
- Ticker
- TIG
Geometry
- Grade
- 40.39
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.1 m
- From
- 21.3 m
- To
- 24.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 21.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CK-15:21.3-24.4
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- low
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 25
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Ag
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 1 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-06-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows moderate-grade silver over a narrow width, indicating mineralization, but its historical nature and lack of verification reduce confidence, and collar details are missing.
Positive factors
- Moderate-grade silver intercept
Negative factors
- Historical data not verified to current NI 43-101 standards
- True width not stated
- Collar attributes not provided in table
Evidence · table
“40.39”
Context: 3.10
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Company owns 100% of the Big Creek and Tad/Toro gold-silver-copper properties situated along strike of the Freegold "
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This is a historical drill result re-announced without new assays or reinterpretation.
Evidence · text
“Highlights from historical drilling are summarized in Table 1 & 2”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The interval is given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.
Evidence · table
“3.10”
Context: 21.30
Cut-off DisclosedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Reason: The cut-off grade of 25 g/t Ag used for compositing is clearly stated.
Evidence · text
“>25 g/t Ag cutoff”
CK-15Coyote Knoll · goldGrade: 0.07Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CK-15
- Project
- Coyote Knoll
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- usa_ut
- Ticker
- TIG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.07
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.1 m
- From
- 21.3 m
- To
- 24.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 21.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CK-15:21.3-24.4
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- low
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 25
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Ag
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 1 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-06-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows low gold grades over a narrow width, but its historical nature and lack of verification reduce confidence, and collar details are missing.
Negative factors
- Low gold grade
- Historical data not verified to current NI 43-101 standards
- True width not stated
- Collar attributes not provided in table
Evidence · table
“0.07”
Context: 3.10
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Company owns 100% of the Big Creek and Tad/Toro gold-silver-copper properties situated along strike of the Freegold "
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This is a historical drill result re-announced without new assays or reinterpretation.
Evidence · text
“Highlights from historical drilling are summarized in Table 1 & 2”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The interval is given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.
Evidence · table
“3.10”
Context: 21.30
Cut-off DisclosedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Reason: The cut-off grade of 25 g/t Ag used for compositing is clearly stated.
Evidence · text
“>25 g/t Ag cutoff”
CK-14Coyote Knoll · goldGrade: 8.19Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.52 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CK-14
- Project
- Coyote Knoll
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- usa_ut
- Ticker
- TIG
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.19
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.52 m
- From
- 9.14 m
- To
- 10.66 m
- Intercept Depth
- 9.14 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CK-14:9.14-10.66
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- low
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 25
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Ag
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 1 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-06-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows strong gold grades over a narrow width, but its historical nature and lack of verification reduce confidence.
Positive factors
- High-grade gold intercept
Negative factors
- Historical data not verified to current NI 43-101 standards
- True width not stated
- Short intercept length
Evidence · text
“CK-14 has an intercept of 8.19g/t Au and 1,060g/t Ag over 1.52 m from 9.14 m downhole.”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Company owns 100% of the Big Creek and Tad/Toro gold-silver-copper properties situated along strike of the Freegold "
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Reason: 8.19 g/t Au is strong grade for gold, especially in an epithermal context.
Evidence · text
“8.19g/t Au”
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This is a historical drill result re-announced without new assays or reinterpretation.
Evidence · text
“Two additional historical drill holes (CK-14 1. and CK-23 2. ) have previously been reported”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The interval is given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.
Evidence · text
“1.52 m”
Cut-off DisclosedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Reason: The cut-off grade of 25 g/t Ag used for compositing is clearly stated.
Evidence · text
“>25 g/t Ag cutoff”
CK-14Coyote Knoll · silverGrade: 1060Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.52 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CK-14
- Project
- Coyote Knoll
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- usa_ut
- Ticker
- TIG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1060
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.52 m
- From
- 9.14 m
- To
- 10.66 m
- Intercept Depth
- 9.14 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CK-14:9.14-10.66
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- low
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 25
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Ag
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 1 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-06-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows bonanza-grade silver over a narrow width, indicating significant mineralization, but its historical nature and lack of verification reduce confidence.
Positive factors
- Exceptionally high-grade silver intercept
Negative factors
- Historical data not verified to current NI 43-101 standards
- True width not stated
- Short intercept length
Evidence · text
“CK-14 has an intercept of 8.19g/t Au and 1,060g/t Ag over 1.52 m from 9.14 m downhole.”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Company owns 100% of the Big Creek and Tad/Toro gold-silver-copper properties situated along strike of the Freegold "
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Reason: 1,060 g/t Ag is exceptionally high grade, well above the 500 g/t exceptional threshold for silver.
Evidence · text
“1,060g/t Ag”
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This is a historical drill result re-announced without new assays or reinterpretation.
Evidence · text
“Two additional historical drill holes (CK-14 1. and CK-23 2. ) have previously been reported”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The interval is given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.
Evidence · text
“1.52 m”
Cut-off DisclosedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Reason: The cut-off grade of 25 g/t Ag used for compositing is clearly stated.
Evidence · text
“>25 g/t Ag cutoff”
CK-23Coyote Knoll · goldGrade: 2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.52 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CK-23
- Project
- Coyote Knoll
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- usa_ut
- Ticker
- TIG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.52 m
- From
- 45.72 m
- To
- 47.24 m
- Intercept Depth
- 45.72 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CK-23:45.72-47.24
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- low
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 25
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Ag
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 1 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-06-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows strong gold grades over a narrow width, but its historical nature and lack of verification reduce confidence.
Positive factors
- High-grade gold intercept
Negative factors
- Historical data not verified to current NI 43-101 standards
- True width not stated
- Short intercept length
Evidence · text
“CK-23 has an intercept of 2g/t Au and 814g/t Ag over 1.52 m from 45.72 m downhole.”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Company owns 100% of the Big Creek and Tad/Toro gold-silver-copper properties situated along strike of the Freegold "
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Reason: 2 g/t Au is strong grade for gold, especially in an epithermal context.
Evidence · text
“2g/t Au”
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This is a historical drill result re-announced without new assays or reinterpretation.
Evidence · text
“Two additional historical drill holes (CK-14 1. and CK-23 2. ) have previously been reported”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The interval is given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.
Evidence · text
“1.52 m”
Cut-off DisclosedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Reason: The cut-off grade of 25 g/t Ag used for compositing is clearly stated.
Evidence · text
“>25 g/t Ag cutoff”
CK-23Coyote Knoll · silverGrade: 814Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.52 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CK-23
- Project
- Coyote Knoll
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- usa_ut
- Ticker
- TIG
Geometry
- Grade
- 814
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.52 m
- From
- 45.72 m
- To
- 47.24 m
- Intercept Depth
- 45.72 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CK-23:45.72-47.24
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Loc. Confidence
- low
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 25
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Ag
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 1 m
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-06-04T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows bonanza-grade silver over a narrow width, indicating significant mineralization, but its historical nature and lack of verification reduce confidence.
Positive factors
- Exceptionally high-grade silver intercept
Negative factors
- Historical data not verified to current NI 43-101 standards
- True width not stated
- Short intercept length
Evidence · text
“CK-23 has an intercept of 2g/t Au and 814g/t Ag over 1.52 m from 45.72 m downhole.”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Company owns 100% of the Big Creek and Tad/Toro gold-silver-copper properties situated along strike of the Freegold "
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Reason: 814 g/t Ag is exceptionally high grade, well above the 500 g/t exceptional threshold for silver.
Evidence · text
“814g/t Ag”
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This is a historical drill result re-announced without new assays or reinterpretation.
Evidence · text
“Two additional historical drill holes (CK-14 1. and CK-23 2. ) have previously been reported”
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The interval is given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.
Evidence · text
“1.52 m”
Cut-off DisclosedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Reason: The cut-off grade of 25 g/t Ag used for compositing is clearly stated.
Evidence · text
“>25 g/t Ag cutoff”
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.