# Triumph Gold Announces the Acquisition of the Coyote Knoll Silver-Gold Mineral Property - Located in Central Utah

Canonical Atlas analysis: https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/triumph-gold-announces-the-acquisition-of-the-coyote-knoll-silver-gold-mineral-p--68ef2cfb-ec9d-4e45-98c1-dd57326d9188

Original source: https://money.tmx.com/en/quote/TIG/news/8710505059655823/triumph-gold-announces-the-acquisition-of-the-coyote-knoll-silver-gold-mineral-p

Publisher: tmx

Original announcement: 2025-06-04T08:00:00.000Z

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published: Unknown date

Atlas analysis updated: Unknown date

- Company: Triumph Gold Corp.

- Ticker: TIG

- Exchange: TSX

- Region: central Utah

- Primary commodity: Silver

- Secondary commodities: Gold, Arsenic, Copper, Lead, Antimony, Zinc

- Document categories: Drill results, Agreement transaction, Other

- Extracted: 2026-09-15 03:11:38 UTC

Narrative sentiment: 0.70 · Bullish

## Minestarters Atlas summary

Triumph Gold Corp. has announced the acquisition of the Coyote Knoll Silver-Gold Property in central Utah for $150,000 USD and 4 million common shares. The property boasts significant historical drill results, including 3.00 metres at 1350.36 g/t Ag and 3.86 g/t Au, and high-grade historical rock samples up to 6,730.00 g/t Ag and 23.30 g/t Au. While the acquisition expands Triumph Gold's portfolio into a mining-friendly region with confirmed epithermal mineralization, the historical data has not been verified to current NI 43-101 standards and requires further exploration.

Reasoning: Triumph Gold acquired the Coyote Knoll Silver-Gold property, which shows high-grade historical drill and surface sample results, expanding the company's portfolio into a new, historically significant region. However, the historical data has not been verified to current NI 43-101 standards, leading to a medium confidence in the reported historical values.

- Positive factor: High-grade historical silver and gold results

- Positive factor: Strategic acquisition in a mining-friendly and historically significant region

- Positive factor: Confirmed epithermal mineralization and potential for further discovery

- Positive factor: QP/CP signed off on the technical content of the news release

- Negative factor: Historical data not verified to current NI 43-101 standards

- Negative factor: Grab samples may not represent true underlying mineralization

- Negative factor: Bulk sample and dore production not verified for accuracy or quality control

- Negative factor: True width not stated for historical drill intercepts

Facts used in scoring: 30

## Classification and evidence

No classification tags are available.

## Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 22. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

## Drill Results (22)

### AT1-C6

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/triumph-gold-announces-the-acquisition-of-the-coyote-knoll-silver-gold-mineral-p--68ef2cfb-ec9d-4e45-98c1-dd57326d9188#fact-drill-facts-1)

Coyote Knoll · silver

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: AT1-C6
- Project: Coyote Knoll
- Commodity: silver
- Region: usa\_ut
- Reported Region: usa\_ut
- Ticker: TIG

#### Geometry

- Grade: 1350.36
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 3 m
- From: 54.1 m
- To: 57.1 m
- Hole Depth: 75 m
- Intercept Depth: 54.1 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: epithermal
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: AT1-C6:54.1-57.1
- Mining Method: open\_pit

#### Location

- Easting: 367897
- Northing: 4408436
- Elevation: 1621 m
- Dip: -90 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 25
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Ag
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes
- Max Dilution: 1 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-06-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows bonanza-grade silver over a moderate width, indicating significant mineralization, but its historical nature and lack of verification reduce confidence.

- Positive factor: Exceptionally high-grade silver intercept

- Negative factor: Historical data not verified to current NI 43-101 standards

- Negative factor: True width not stated

Evidence · table

> 1350.36

Context: 3.00

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Compositing Transparent**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade and internal dilution are both stated

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Company owns 100% of the Big Creek and Tad/Toro gold-silver-copper properties situated along strike of the Freegold "

#### Rejected tags

**Bonanza Intercept** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: 1350.36 g/t Ag is exceptionally high grade, well above the 500 g/t exceptional threshold for silver.

Evidence · table

> 1350.36

Context: 3.00

**Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: This is a historical drill result re-announced without new assays or reinterpretation.

Evidence · text

> Highlights from historical drilling are summarized in Table 1 &amp; 2

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The interval is given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.

Evidence · table

> 3.00

Context: 54.10

**Cut-off Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Story-specific tag

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 25 g/t Ag used for compositing is clearly stated.

Evidence · text

> &gt;25 g/t Ag cutoff

### AT1-C6

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/triumph-gold-announces-the-acquisition-of-the-coyote-knoll-silver-gold-mineral-p--68ef2cfb-ec9d-4e45-98c1-dd57326d9188#fact-drill-facts-2)

Coyote Knoll · gold

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: AT1-C6
- Project: Coyote Knoll
- Commodity: gold
- Region: usa\_ut
- Reported Region: usa\_ut
- Ticker: TIG

#### Geometry

- Grade: 3.86
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 3 m
- From: 54.1 m
- To: 57.1 m
- Hole Depth: 75 m
- Intercept Depth: 54.1 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: epithermal
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: AT1-C6:54.1-57.1
- Mining Method: open\_pit

#### Location

- Easting: 367897
- Northing: 4408436
- Elevation: 1621 m
- Dip: -90 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 25
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Ag
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes
- Max Dilution: 1 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-06-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows strong gold grades over a moderate width, indicating significant mineralization, but its historical nature and lack of verification reduce confidence.

- Positive factor: High-grade gold intercept

- Negative factor: Historical data not verified to current NI 43-101 standards

- Negative factor: True width not stated

Evidence · table

> 3.86

Context: 3.00

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Compositing Transparent**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade and internal dilution are both stated

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Company owns 100% of the Big Creek and Tad/Toro gold-silver-copper properties situated along strike of the Freegold "

#### Rejected tags

**Bonanza Intercept** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: 3.86 g/t Au is strong grade for gold, especially in an epithermal context.

Evidence · table

> 3.86

Context: 3.00

**Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: This is a historical drill result re-announced without new assays or reinterpretation.

Evidence · text

> Highlights from historical drilling are summarized in Table 1 &amp; 2

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The interval is given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.

Evidence · table

> 3.00

Context: 54.10

**Cut-off Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Story-specific tag

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 25 g/t Ag used for compositing is clearly stated.

Evidence · text

> &gt;25 g/t Ag cutoff

### CK-10

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/triumph-gold-announces-the-acquisition-of-the-coyote-knoll-silver-gold-mineral-p--68ef2cfb-ec9d-4e45-98c1-dd57326d9188#fact-drill-facts-3)

Coyote Knoll · silver

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: CK-10
- Project: Coyote Knoll
- Commodity: silver
- Region: usa\_ut
- Reported Region: usa\_ut
- Ticker: TIG

#### Geometry

- Grade: 114.84
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 6.1 m
- From: 68.6 m
- To: 74.7 m
- Hole Depth: 110 m
- Intercept Depth: 68.6 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: epithermal
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: CK-10:68.6-74.7
- Mining Method: open\_pit

#### Location

- Easting: 367951
- Northing: 4408442
- Elevation: 1624 m
- Dip: -90 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 25
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Ag
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes
- Max Dilution: 1 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-06-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows moderate-grade silver over a good width, indicating mineralization, but its historical nature and lack of verification reduce confidence.

- Positive factor: Moderate-grade silver intercept over good width

- Negative factor: Historical data not verified to current NI 43-101 standards

- Negative factor: True width not stated

Evidence · table

> 114.84

Context: 6.10

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Compositing Transparent**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade and internal dilution are both stated

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Company owns 100% of the Big Creek and Tad/Toro gold-silver-copper properties situated along strike of the Freegold "

#### Rejected tags

**Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: This is a historical drill result re-announced without new assays or reinterpretation.

Evidence · text

> Highlights from historical drilling are summarized in Table 1 &amp; 2

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The interval is given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.

Evidence · table

> 6.10

Context: 68.60

**Cut-off Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Story-specific tag

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 25 g/t Ag used for compositing is clearly stated.

Evidence · text

> &gt;25 g/t Ag cutoff

### CK-10

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/triumph-gold-announces-the-acquisition-of-the-coyote-knoll-silver-gold-mineral-p--68ef2cfb-ec9d-4e45-98c1-dd57326d9188#fact-drill-facts-4)

Coyote Knoll · gold

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: CK-10
- Project: Coyote Knoll
- Commodity: gold
- Region: usa\_ut
- Reported Region: usa\_ut
- Ticker: TIG

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.12
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 6.1 m
- From: 68.6 m
- To: 74.7 m
- Hole Depth: 110 m
- Intercept Depth: 68.6 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: epithermal
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: CK-10:68.6-74.7
- Mining Method: open\_pit

#### Location

- Easting: 367951
- Northing: 4408442
- Elevation: 1624 m
- Dip: -90 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 25
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Ag
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes
- Max Dilution: 1 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-06-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows low gold grades over a good width, but its historical nature and lack of verification reduce confidence.

- Negative factor: Low gold grade

- Negative factor: Historical data not verified to current NI 43-101 standards

- Negative factor: True width not stated

Evidence · table

> 0.12

Context: 6.10

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Compositing Transparent**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade and internal dilution are both stated

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Company owns 100% of the Big Creek and Tad/Toro gold-silver-copper properties situated along strike of the Freegold "

#### Rejected tags

**Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: This is a historical drill result re-announced without new assays or reinterpretation.

Evidence · text

> Highlights from historical drilling are summarized in Table 1 &amp; 2

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The interval is given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.

Evidence · table

> 6.10

Context: 68.60

**Cut-off Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Story-specific tag

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 25 g/t Ag used for compositing is clearly stated.

Evidence · text

> &gt;25 g/t Ag cutoff

### AT1-C5

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/triumph-gold-announces-the-acquisition-of-the-coyote-knoll-silver-gold-mineral-p--68ef2cfb-ec9d-4e45-98c1-dd57326d9188#fact-drill-facts-5)

Coyote Knoll · silver

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: AT1-C5
- Project: Coyote Knoll
- Commodity: silver
- Region: usa\_ut
- Reported Region: usa\_ut
- Ticker: TIG

#### Geometry

- Grade: 99.37
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 4.5 m
- From: 49.8 m
- To: 54.3 m
- Hole Depth: 76 m
- Intercept Depth: 49.8 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: epithermal
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: AT1-C5:49.8-54.3
- Mining Method: open\_pit

#### Location

- Easting: 367889
- Northing: 4408432
- Elevation: 1622 m
- Dip: -90 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 25
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Ag
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes
- Max Dilution: 1 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-06-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows moderate-grade silver over a good width, indicating mineralization, but its historical nature and lack of verification reduce confidence.

- Positive factor: Moderate-grade silver intercept

- Negative factor: Historical data not verified to current NI 43-101 standards

- Negative factor: True width not stated

Evidence · table

> 99.37

Context: 4.50

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Compositing Transparent**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade and internal dilution are both stated

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Company owns 100% of the Big Creek and Tad/Toro gold-silver-copper properties situated along strike of the Freegold "

#### Rejected tags

**Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: This is a historical drill result re-announced without new assays or reinterpretation.

Evidence · text

> Highlights from historical drilling are summarized in Table 1 &amp; 2

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The interval is given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.

Evidence · table

> 4.50

Context: 49.80

**Cut-off Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Story-specific tag

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 25 g/t Ag used for compositing is clearly stated.

Evidence · text

> &gt;25 g/t Ag cutoff

### AT1-C5

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/triumph-gold-announces-the-acquisition-of-the-coyote-knoll-silver-gold-mineral-p--68ef2cfb-ec9d-4e45-98c1-dd57326d9188#fact-drill-facts-6)

Coyote Knoll · gold

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: AT1-C5
- Project: Coyote Knoll
- Commodity: gold
- Region: usa\_ut
- Reported Region: usa\_ut
- Ticker: TIG

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.4
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 4.5 m
- From: 49.8 m
- To: 54.3 m
- Hole Depth: 76 m
- Intercept Depth: 49.8 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: epithermal
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: AT1-C5:49.8-54.3
- Mining Method: open\_pit

#### Location

- Easting: 367889
- Northing: 4408432
- Elevation: 1622 m
- Dip: -90 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 25
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Ag
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes
- Max Dilution: 1 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-06-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows low gold grades over a good width, but its historical nature and lack of verification reduce confidence.

- Negative factor: Low gold grade

- Negative factor: Historical data not verified to current NI 43-101 standards

- Negative factor: True width not stated

Evidence · table

> 0.40

Context: 4.50

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Compositing Transparent**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade and internal dilution are both stated

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Company owns 100% of the Big Creek and Tad/Toro gold-silver-copper properties situated along strike of the Freegold "

#### Rejected tags

**Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: This is a historical drill result re-announced without new assays or reinterpretation.

Evidence · text

> Highlights from historical drilling are summarized in Table 1 &amp; 2

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The interval is given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.

Evidence · table

> 4.50

Context: 49.80

**Cut-off Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Story-specific tag

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 25 g/t Ag used for compositing is clearly stated.

Evidence · text

> &gt;25 g/t Ag cutoff

### CK-1

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/triumph-gold-announces-the-acquisition-of-the-coyote-knoll-silver-gold-mineral-p--68ef2cfb-ec9d-4e45-98c1-dd57326d9188#fact-drill-facts-7)

Coyote Knoll · silver

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: CK-1
- Project: Coyote Knoll
- Commodity: silver
- Region: usa\_ut
- Reported Region: usa\_ut
- Ticker: TIG

#### Geometry

- Grade: 68.89
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 4.6 m
- From: 27.4 m
- To: 32 m
- Hole Depth: 80 m
- Intercept Depth: 27.4 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: epithermal
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: CK-1:27.4-32
- Mining Method: open\_pit

#### Location

- Easting: 367904
- Northing: 4408411
- Elevation: 1613 m
- Azimuth: 170 °
- Dip: -60 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 25
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Ag
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes
- Max Dilution: 1 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-06-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows moderate-grade silver over a good width, indicating mineralization, but its historical nature and lack of verification reduce confidence.

- Positive factor: Moderate-grade silver intercept

- Negative factor: Historical data not verified to current NI 43-101 standards

- Negative factor: True width not stated

Evidence · table

> 68.89

Context: 4.60

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Compositing Transparent**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade and internal dilution are both stated

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Company owns 100% of the Big Creek and Tad/Toro gold-silver-copper properties situated along strike of the Freegold "

#### Rejected tags

**Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: This is a historical drill result re-announced without new assays or reinterpretation.

Evidence · text

> Highlights from historical drilling are summarized in Table 1 &amp; 2

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The interval is given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.

Evidence · table

> 4.60

Context: 27.40

**Cut-off Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Story-specific tag

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 25 g/t Ag used for compositing is clearly stated.

Evidence · text

> &gt;25 g/t Ag cutoff

### CK-1

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/triumph-gold-announces-the-acquisition-of-the-coyote-knoll-silver-gold-mineral-p--68ef2cfb-ec9d-4e45-98c1-dd57326d9188#fact-drill-facts-8)

Coyote Knoll · gold

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: CK-1
- Project: Coyote Knoll
- Commodity: gold
- Region: usa\_ut
- Reported Region: usa\_ut
- Ticker: TIG

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.09
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 4.6 m
- From: 27.4 m
- To: 32 m
- Hole Depth: 80 m
- Intercept Depth: 27.4 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: epithermal
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: CK-1:27.4-32
- Mining Method: open\_pit

#### Location

- Easting: 367904
- Northing: 4408411
- Elevation: 1613 m
- Azimuth: 170 °
- Dip: -60 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 25
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Ag
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes
- Max Dilution: 1 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-06-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows low gold grades over a good width, but its historical nature and lack of verification reduce confidence.

- Negative factor: Low gold grade

- Negative factor: Historical data not verified to current NI 43-101 standards

- Negative factor: True width not stated

Evidence · table

> 0.09

Context: 4.60

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Compositing Transparent**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade and internal dilution are both stated

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Company owns 100% of the Big Creek and Tad/Toro gold-silver-copper properties situated along strike of the Freegold "

#### Rejected tags

**Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: This is a historical drill result re-announced without new assays or reinterpretation.

Evidence · text

> Highlights from historical drilling are summarized in Table 1 &amp; 2

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The interval is given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.

Evidence · table

> 4.60

Context: 27.40

**Cut-off Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Story-specific tag

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 25 g/t Ag used for compositing is clearly stated.

Evidence · text

> &gt;25 g/t Ag cutoff

### CK-10

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/triumph-gold-announces-the-acquisition-of-the-coyote-knoll-silver-gold-mineral-p--68ef2cfb-ec9d-4e45-98c1-dd57326d9188#fact-drill-facts-9)

Coyote Knoll · silver

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: CK-10
- Project: Coyote Knoll
- Commodity: silver
- Region: usa\_ut
- Reported Region: usa\_ut
- Ticker: TIG

#### Geometry

- Grade: 67.81
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 3.1 m
- From: 51.8 m
- To: 54.9 m
- Hole Depth: 110 m
- Intercept Depth: 51.8 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: epithermal
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: CK-10:51.8-54.9
- Mining Method: open\_pit

#### Location

- Easting: 367951
- Northing: 4408442
- Elevation: 1624 m
- Dip: -90 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 25
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Ag
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes
- Max Dilution: 1 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-06-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows moderate-grade silver over a narrow width, indicating mineralization, but its historical nature and lack of verification reduce confidence.

- Positive factor: Moderate-grade silver intercept

- Negative factor: Historical data not verified to current NI 43-101 standards

- Negative factor: True width not stated

Evidence · table

> 67.81

Context: 3.10

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Compositing Transparent**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade and internal dilution are both stated

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Company owns 100% of the Big Creek and Tad/Toro gold-silver-copper properties situated along strike of the Freegold "

#### Rejected tags

**Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: This is a historical drill result re-announced without new assays or reinterpretation.

Evidence · text

> Highlights from historical drilling are summarized in Table 1 &amp; 2

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The interval is given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.

Evidence · table

> 3.10

Context: 51.80

**Cut-off Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Story-specific tag

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 25 g/t Ag used for compositing is clearly stated.

Evidence · text

> &gt;25 g/t Ag cutoff

### CK-10

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/triumph-gold-announces-the-acquisition-of-the-coyote-knoll-silver-gold-mineral-p--68ef2cfb-ec9d-4e45-98c1-dd57326d9188#fact-drill-facts-10)

Coyote Knoll · gold

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: CK-10
- Project: Coyote Knoll
- Commodity: gold
- Region: usa\_ut
- Reported Region: usa\_ut
- Ticker: TIG

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.38
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 3.1 m
- From: 51.8 m
- To: 54.9 m
- Hole Depth: 110 m
- Intercept Depth: 51.8 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: epithermal
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: CK-10:51.8-54.9
- Mining Method: open\_pit

#### Location

- Easting: 367951
- Northing: 4408442
- Elevation: 1624 m
- Dip: -90 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 25
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Ag
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes
- Max Dilution: 1 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-06-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows low gold grades over a narrow width, but its historical nature and lack of verification reduce confidence.

- Negative factor: Low gold grade

- Negative factor: Historical data not verified to current NI 43-101 standards

- Negative factor: True width not stated

Evidence · table

> 0.38

Context: 3.10

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Compositing Transparent**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade and internal dilution are both stated

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Company owns 100% of the Big Creek and Tad/Toro gold-silver-copper properties situated along strike of the Freegold "

#### Rejected tags

**Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: This is a historical drill result re-announced without new assays or reinterpretation.

Evidence · text

> Highlights from historical drilling are summarized in Table 1 &amp; 2

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The interval is given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.

Evidence · table

> 3.10

Context: 51.80

**Cut-off Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Story-specific tag

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 25 g/t Ag used for compositing is clearly stated.

Evidence · text

> &gt;25 g/t Ag cutoff

### CK-10

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/triumph-gold-announces-the-acquisition-of-the-coyote-knoll-silver-gold-mineral-p--68ef2cfb-ec9d-4e45-98c1-dd57326d9188#fact-drill-facts-11)

Coyote Knoll · silver

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: CK-10
- Project: Coyote Knoll
- Commodity: silver
- Region: usa\_ut
- Reported Region: usa\_ut
- Ticker: TIG

#### Geometry

- Grade: 38.5
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 3 m
- From: 61 m
- To: 64 m
- Hole Depth: 110 m
- Intercept Depth: 61 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: epithermal
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: CK-10:61-64
- Mining Method: open\_pit

#### Location

- Easting: 367951
- Northing: 4408442
- Elevation: 1624 m
- Dip: -90 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 25
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Ag
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes
- Max Dilution: 1 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-06-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows moderate-grade silver over a narrow width, indicating mineralization, but its historical nature and lack of verification reduce confidence.

- Positive factor: Moderate-grade silver intercept

- Negative factor: Historical data not verified to current NI 43-101 standards

- Negative factor: True width not stated

Evidence · table

> 38.50

Context: 3.00

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Compositing Transparent**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade and internal dilution are both stated

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Company owns 100% of the Big Creek and Tad/Toro gold-silver-copper properties situated along strike of the Freegold "

#### Rejected tags

**Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: This is a historical drill result re-announced without new assays or reinterpretation.

Evidence · text

> Highlights from historical drilling are summarized in Table 1 &amp; 2

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The interval is given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.

Evidence · table

> 3.00

Context: 61.00

**Cut-off Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Story-specific tag

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 25 g/t Ag used for compositing is clearly stated.

Evidence · text

> &gt;25 g/t Ag cutoff

### CK-10

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/triumph-gold-announces-the-acquisition-of-the-coyote-knoll-silver-gold-mineral-p--68ef2cfb-ec9d-4e45-98c1-dd57326d9188#fact-drill-facts-12)

Coyote Knoll · gold

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: CK-10
- Project: Coyote Knoll
- Commodity: gold
- Region: usa\_ut
- Reported Region: usa\_ut
- Ticker: TIG

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.08
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 3 m
- From: 61 m
- To: 64 m
- Hole Depth: 110 m
- Intercept Depth: 61 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: epithermal
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: CK-10:61-64
- Mining Method: open\_pit

#### Location

- Easting: 367951
- Northing: 4408442
- Elevation: 1624 m
- Dip: -90 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 25
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Ag
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes
- Max Dilution: 1 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-06-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows low gold grades over a narrow width, but its historical nature and lack of verification reduce confidence.

- Negative factor: Low gold grade

- Negative factor: Historical data not verified to current NI 43-101 standards

- Negative factor: True width not stated

Evidence · table

> 0.08

Context: 3.00

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Compositing Transparent**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade and internal dilution are both stated

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Company owns 100% of the Big Creek and Tad/Toro gold-silver-copper properties situated along strike of the Freegold "

#### Rejected tags

**Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: This is a historical drill result re-announced without new assays or reinterpretation.

Evidence · text

> Highlights from historical drilling are summarized in Table 1 &amp; 2

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The interval is given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.

Evidence · table

> 3.00

Context: 61.00

**Cut-off Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Story-specific tag

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 25 g/t Ag used for compositing is clearly stated.

Evidence · text

> &gt;25 g/t Ag cutoff

### CK-2

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/triumph-gold-announces-the-acquisition-of-the-coyote-knoll-silver-gold-mineral-p--68ef2cfb-ec9d-4e45-98c1-dd57326d9188#fact-drill-facts-13)

Coyote Knoll · silver

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: CK-2
- Project: Coyote Knoll
- Commodity: silver
- Region: usa\_ut
- Reported Region: usa\_ut
- Ticker: TIG

#### Geometry

- Grade: 60
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 3 m
- From: 36.6 m
- To: 39.6 m
- Hole Depth: 87 m
- Intercept Depth: 36.6 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: epithermal
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: CK-2:36.6-39.6
- Mining Method: open\_pit

#### Location

- Easting: 367910
- Northing: 4408421
- Elevation: 1616 m
- Dip: -90 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 25
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Ag
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes
- Max Dilution: 1 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-06-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows moderate-grade silver over a narrow width, indicating mineralization, but its historical nature and lack of verification reduce confidence.

- Positive factor: Moderate-grade silver intercept

- Negative factor: Historical data not verified to current NI 43-101 standards

- Negative factor: True width not stated

Evidence · table

> 60.00

Context: 3.00

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Compositing Transparent**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade and internal dilution are both stated

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Company owns 100% of the Big Creek and Tad/Toro gold-silver-copper properties situated along strike of the Freegold "

#### Rejected tags

**Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: This is a historical drill result re-announced without new assays or reinterpretation.

Evidence · text

> Highlights from historical drilling are summarized in Table 1 &amp; 2

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The interval is given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.

Evidence · table

> 3.00

Context: 36.60

**Cut-off Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Story-specific tag

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 25 g/t Ag used for compositing is clearly stated.

Evidence · text

> &gt;25 g/t Ag cutoff

### CK-2

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/triumph-gold-announces-the-acquisition-of-the-coyote-knoll-silver-gold-mineral-p--68ef2cfb-ec9d-4e45-98c1-dd57326d9188#fact-drill-facts-14)

Coyote Knoll · gold

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: CK-2
- Project: Coyote Knoll
- Commodity: gold
- Region: usa\_ut
- Reported Region: usa\_ut
- Ticker: TIG

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.18
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 3 m
- From: 36.6 m
- To: 39.6 m
- Hole Depth: 87 m
- Intercept Depth: 36.6 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: epithermal
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: CK-2:36.6-39.6
- Mining Method: open\_pit

#### Location

- Easting: 367910
- Northing: 4408421
- Elevation: 1616 m
- Dip: -90 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 25
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Ag
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes
- Max Dilution: 1 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-06-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows low gold grades over a narrow width, but its historical nature and lack of verification reduce confidence.

- Negative factor: Low gold grade

- Negative factor: Historical data not verified to current NI 43-101 standards

- Negative factor: True width not stated

Evidence · table

> 0.18

Context: 3.00

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Compositing Transparent**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade and internal dilution are both stated

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Company owns 100% of the Big Creek and Tad/Toro gold-silver-copper properties situated along strike of the Freegold "

#### Rejected tags

**Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: This is a historical drill result re-announced without new assays or reinterpretation.

Evidence · text

> Highlights from historical drilling are summarized in Table 1 &amp; 2

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The interval is given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.

Evidence · table

> 3.00

Context: 36.60

**Cut-off Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Story-specific tag

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 25 g/t Ag used for compositing is clearly stated.

Evidence · text

> &gt;25 g/t Ag cutoff

### CK-2

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/triumph-gold-announces-the-acquisition-of-the-coyote-knoll-silver-gold-mineral-p--68ef2cfb-ec9d-4e45-98c1-dd57326d9188#fact-drill-facts-15)

Coyote Knoll · silver

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: CK-2
- Project: Coyote Knoll
- Commodity: silver
- Region: usa\_ut
- Reported Region: usa\_ut
- Ticker: TIG

#### Geometry

- Grade: 39.04
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 4.6 m
- From: 53.3 m
- To: 57.9 m
- Hole Depth: 87 m
- Intercept Depth: 53.3 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: epithermal
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: CK-2:53.3-57.9
- Mining Method: open\_pit

#### Location

- Easting: 367910
- Northing: 4408421
- Elevation: 1616 m
- Dip: -90 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 25
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Ag
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes
- Max Dilution: 1 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-06-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows moderate-grade silver over a good width, indicating mineralization, but its historical nature and lack of verification reduce confidence.

- Positive factor: Moderate-grade silver intercept

- Negative factor: Historical data not verified to current NI 43-101 standards

- Negative factor: True width not stated

Evidence · table

> 39.04

Context: 4.60

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Compositing Transparent**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade and internal dilution are both stated

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Company owns 100% of the Big Creek and Tad/Toro gold-silver-copper properties situated along strike of the Freegold "

#### Rejected tags

**Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: This is a historical drill result re-announced without new assays or reinterpretation.

Evidence · text

> Highlights from historical drilling are summarized in Table 1 &amp; 2

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The interval is given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.

Evidence · table

> 4.60

Context: 53.30

**Cut-off Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Story-specific tag

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 25 g/t Ag used for compositing is clearly stated.

Evidence · text

> &gt;25 g/t Ag cutoff

### CK-2

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/triumph-gold-announces-the-acquisition-of-the-coyote-knoll-silver-gold-mineral-p--68ef2cfb-ec9d-4e45-98c1-dd57326d9188#fact-drill-facts-16)

Coyote Knoll · gold

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: CK-2
- Project: Coyote Knoll
- Commodity: gold
- Region: usa\_ut
- Reported Region: usa\_ut
- Ticker: TIG

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.09
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 4.6 m
- From: 53.3 m
- To: 57.9 m
- Hole Depth: 87 m
- Intercept Depth: 53.3 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: epithermal
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: CK-2:53.3-57.9
- Mining Method: open\_pit

#### Location

- Easting: 367910
- Northing: 4408421
- Elevation: 1616 m
- Dip: -90 °
- Loc. Confidence: high
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 25
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Ag
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes
- Max Dilution: 1 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-06-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows low gold grades over a good width, but its historical nature and lack of verification reduce confidence.

- Negative factor: Low gold grade

- Negative factor: Historical data not verified to current NI 43-101 standards

- Negative factor: True width not stated

Evidence · table

> 0.09

Context: 4.60

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Compositing Transparent**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade and internal dilution are both stated

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Company owns 100% of the Big Creek and Tad/Toro gold-silver-copper properties situated along strike of the Freegold "

#### Rejected tags

**Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: This is a historical drill result re-announced without new assays or reinterpretation.

Evidence · text

> Highlights from historical drilling are summarized in Table 1 &amp; 2

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The interval is given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.

Evidence · table

> 4.60

Context: 53.30

**Cut-off Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Story-specific tag

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 25 g/t Ag used for compositing is clearly stated.

Evidence · text

> &gt;25 g/t Ag cutoff

### CK-15

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/triumph-gold-announces-the-acquisition-of-the-coyote-knoll-silver-gold-mineral-p--68ef2cfb-ec9d-4e45-98c1-dd57326d9188#fact-drill-facts-17)

Coyote Knoll · silver

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: CK-15
- Project: Coyote Knoll
- Commodity: silver
- Region: usa\_ut
- Reported Region: usa\_ut
- Ticker: TIG

#### Geometry

- Grade: 40.39
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 3.1 m
- From: 21.3 m
- To: 24.4 m
- Intercept Depth: 21.3 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: epithermal
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: CK-15:21.3-24.4
- Mining Method: open\_pit

#### Location

- Loc. Confidence: low

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 25
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Ag
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes
- Max Dilution: 1 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-06-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows moderate-grade silver over a narrow width, indicating mineralization, but its historical nature and lack of verification reduce confidence, and collar details are missing.

- Positive factor: Moderate-grade silver intercept

- Negative factor: Historical data not verified to current NI 43-101 standards

- Negative factor: True width not stated

- Negative factor: Collar attributes not provided in table

Evidence · table

> 40.39

Context: 3.10

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Compositing Transparent**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade and internal dilution are both stated

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Company owns 100% of the Big Creek and Tad/Toro gold-silver-copper properties situated along strike of the Freegold "

#### Rejected tags

**Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: This is a historical drill result re-announced without new assays or reinterpretation.

Evidence · text

> Highlights from historical drilling are summarized in Table 1 &amp; 2

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The interval is given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.

Evidence · table

> 3.10

Context: 21.30

**Cut-off Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Story-specific tag

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 25 g/t Ag used for compositing is clearly stated.

Evidence · text

> &gt;25 g/t Ag cutoff

### CK-15

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/triumph-gold-announces-the-acquisition-of-the-coyote-knoll-silver-gold-mineral-p--68ef2cfb-ec9d-4e45-98c1-dd57326d9188#fact-drill-facts-18)

Coyote Knoll · gold

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: CK-15
- Project: Coyote Knoll
- Commodity: gold
- Region: usa\_ut
- Reported Region: usa\_ut
- Ticker: TIG

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.07
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 3.1 m
- From: 21.3 m
- To: 24.4 m
- Intercept Depth: 21.3 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: epithermal
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: CK-15:21.3-24.4
- Mining Method: open\_pit

#### Location

- Loc. Confidence: low

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 25
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Ag
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes
- Max Dilution: 1 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-06-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows low gold grades over a narrow width, but its historical nature and lack of verification reduce confidence, and collar details are missing.

- Negative factor: Low gold grade

- Negative factor: Historical data not verified to current NI 43-101 standards

- Negative factor: True width not stated

- Negative factor: Collar attributes not provided in table

Evidence · table

> 0.07

Context: 3.10

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Compositing Transparent**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade and internal dilution are both stated

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Company owns 100% of the Big Creek and Tad/Toro gold-silver-copper properties situated along strike of the Freegold "

#### Rejected tags

**Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: This is a historical drill result re-announced without new assays or reinterpretation.

Evidence · text

> Highlights from historical drilling are summarized in Table 1 &amp; 2

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The interval is given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.

Evidence · table

> 3.10

Context: 21.30

**Cut-off Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Story-specific tag

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 25 g/t Ag used for compositing is clearly stated.

Evidence · text

> &gt;25 g/t Ag cutoff

### CK-14

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/triumph-gold-announces-the-acquisition-of-the-coyote-knoll-silver-gold-mineral-p--68ef2cfb-ec9d-4e45-98c1-dd57326d9188#fact-drill-facts-19)

Coyote Knoll · gold

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: CK-14
- Project: Coyote Knoll
- Commodity: gold
- Region: usa\_ut
- Reported Region: usa\_ut
- Ticker: TIG

#### Geometry

- Grade: 8.19
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 1.52 m
- From: 9.14 m
- To: 10.66 m
- Intercept Depth: 9.14 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: epithermal
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: CK-14:9.14-10.66
- Mining Method: open\_pit

#### Location

- Loc. Confidence: low

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 25
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Ag
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes
- Max Dilution: 1 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-06-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows strong gold grades over a narrow width, but its historical nature and lack of verification reduce confidence.

- Positive factor: High-grade gold intercept

- Negative factor: Historical data not verified to current NI 43-101 standards

- Negative factor: True width not stated

- Negative factor: Short intercept length

Evidence · text

> CK-14 has an intercept of 8.19g/t Au and 1,060g/t Ag over 1.52 m from 9.14 m downhole.

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Compositing Transparent**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade and internal dilution are both stated

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Company owns 100% of the Big Creek and Tad/Toro gold-silver-copper properties situated along strike of the Freegold "

#### Rejected tags

**Bonanza Intercept** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: 8.19 g/t Au is strong grade for gold, especially in an epithermal context.

Evidence · text

> 8.19g/t Au

**Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: This is a historical drill result re-announced without new assays or reinterpretation.

Evidence · text

> Two additional historical drill holes \(CK-14 1. and CK-23 2. \) have previously been reported

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The interval is given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.

Evidence · text

> 1.52 m

**Cut-off Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Story-specific tag

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 25 g/t Ag used for compositing is clearly stated.

Evidence · text

> &gt;25 g/t Ag cutoff

### CK-14

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/triumph-gold-announces-the-acquisition-of-the-coyote-knoll-silver-gold-mineral-p--68ef2cfb-ec9d-4e45-98c1-dd57326d9188#fact-drill-facts-20)

Coyote Knoll · silver

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: CK-14
- Project: Coyote Knoll
- Commodity: silver
- Region: usa\_ut
- Reported Region: usa\_ut
- Ticker: TIG

#### Geometry

- Grade: 1060
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 1.52 m
- From: 9.14 m
- To: 10.66 m
- Intercept Depth: 9.14 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: epithermal
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: CK-14:9.14-10.66
- Mining Method: open\_pit

#### Location

- Loc. Confidence: low

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 25
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Ag
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes
- Max Dilution: 1 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-06-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows bonanza-grade silver over a narrow width, indicating significant mineralization, but its historical nature and lack of verification reduce confidence.

- Positive factor: Exceptionally high-grade silver intercept

- Negative factor: Historical data not verified to current NI 43-101 standards

- Negative factor: True width not stated

- Negative factor: Short intercept length

Evidence · text

> CK-14 has an intercept of 8.19g/t Au and 1,060g/t Ag over 1.52 m from 9.14 m downhole.

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Compositing Transparent**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade and internal dilution are both stated

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Company owns 100% of the Big Creek and Tad/Toro gold-silver-copper properties situated along strike of the Freegold "

#### Rejected tags

**Bonanza Intercept** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: 1,060 g/t Ag is exceptionally high grade, well above the 500 g/t exceptional threshold for silver.

Evidence · text

> 1,060g/t Ag

**Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: This is a historical drill result re-announced without new assays or reinterpretation.

Evidence · text

> Two additional historical drill holes \(CK-14 1. and CK-23 2. \) have previously been reported

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The interval is given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.

Evidence · text

> 1.52 m

**Cut-off Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Story-specific tag

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 25 g/t Ag used for compositing is clearly stated.

Evidence · text

> &gt;25 g/t Ag cutoff

### CK-23

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/triumph-gold-announces-the-acquisition-of-the-coyote-knoll-silver-gold-mineral-p--68ef2cfb-ec9d-4e45-98c1-dd57326d9188#fact-drill-facts-21)

Coyote Knoll · gold

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: CK-23
- Project: Coyote Knoll
- Commodity: gold
- Region: usa\_ut
- Reported Region: usa\_ut
- Ticker: TIG

#### Geometry

- Grade: 2
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 1.52 m
- From: 45.72 m
- To: 47.24 m
- Intercept Depth: 45.72 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: epithermal
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: CK-23:45.72-47.24
- Mining Method: open\_pit

#### Location

- Loc. Confidence: low

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 25
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Ag
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes
- Max Dilution: 1 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-06-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows strong gold grades over a narrow width, but its historical nature and lack of verification reduce confidence.

- Positive factor: High-grade gold intercept

- Negative factor: Historical data not verified to current NI 43-101 standards

- Negative factor: True width not stated

- Negative factor: Short intercept length

Evidence · text

> CK-23 has an intercept of 2g/t Au and 814g/t Ag over 1.52 m from 45.72 m downhole.

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Compositing Transparent**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade and internal dilution are both stated

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Company owns 100% of the Big Creek and Tad/Toro gold-silver-copper properties situated along strike of the Freegold "

#### Rejected tags

**Bonanza Intercept** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: 2 g/t Au is strong grade for gold, especially in an epithermal context.

Evidence · text

> 2g/t Au

**Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: This is a historical drill result re-announced without new assays or reinterpretation.

Evidence · text

> Two additional historical drill holes \(CK-14 1. and CK-23 2. \) have previously been reported

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The interval is given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.

Evidence · text

> 1.52 m

**Cut-off Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Story-specific tag

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 25 g/t Ag used for compositing is clearly stated.

Evidence · text

> &gt;25 g/t Ag cutoff

### CK-23

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/triumph-gold-announces-the-acquisition-of-the-coyote-knoll-silver-gold-mineral-p--68ef2cfb-ec9d-4e45-98c1-dd57326d9188#fact-drill-facts-22)

Coyote Knoll · silver

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: CK-23
- Project: Coyote Knoll
- Commodity: silver
- Region: usa\_ut
- Reported Region: usa\_ut
- Ticker: TIG

#### Geometry

- Grade: 814
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 1.52 m
- From: 45.72 m
- To: 47.24 m
- Intercept Depth: 45.72 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: epithermal
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: CK-23:45.72-47.24
- Mining Method: open\_pit

#### Location

- Loc. Confidence: low

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 25
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Ag
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes
- Max Dilution: 1 m

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-06-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows bonanza-grade silver over a narrow width, indicating significant mineralization, but its historical nature and lack of verification reduce confidence.

- Positive factor: Exceptionally high-grade silver intercept

- Negative factor: Historical data not verified to current NI 43-101 standards

- Negative factor: True width not stated

- Negative factor: Short intercept length

Evidence · text

> CK-23 has an intercept of 2g/t Au and 814g/t Ag over 1.52 m from 45.72 m downhole.

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Compositing Transparent**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade and internal dilution are both stated

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "The Company owns 100% of the Big Creek and Tad/Toro gold-silver-copper properties situated along strike of the Freegold "

#### Rejected tags

**Bonanza Intercept** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: 814 g/t Ag is exceptionally high grade, well above the 500 g/t exceptional threshold for silver.

Evidence · text

> 814g/t Ag

**Stale Data Re-release** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Reason: This is a historical drill result re-announced without new assays or reinterpretation.

Evidence · text

> Two additional historical drill holes \(CK-14 1. and CK-23 2. \) have previously been reported

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The interval is given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation.

Evidence · text

> 1.52 m

**Cut-off Disclosed** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Story-specific tag

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Reason: The cut-off grade of 25 g/t Ag used for compositing is clearly stated.

Evidence · text

> &gt;25 g/t Ag cutoff

## How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.
