Triumph Gold Discovers a New Silver and Gold Vein Showing at the Freegold Mountain Project, Yukon

Original announcement by tmx on

Company
Triumph Gold Corp.
Ticker
TIG
Exchange
TSX
Region
Yukon, Canada
Primary commodity
Gold
Secondary commodities
Silver, Copper, Arsenic, Antimony, Bismuth
Document categories
Drill results, Resource update
Extracted
2026-09-15 03:12:50 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Triumph Gold Corp. announced the discovery of a new high-grade silver-gold vein system, the Proton Zone, at its Freegold Mountain Project in Yukon, Canada, with surface grab samples returning up to 5.95 g/t gold and 8.99 g/t silver. The company also highlighted significant historical 2021 drill intercepts from the Nucleus deposit, including 17.25 m at 1.02 g/t AuEq. The project hosts a 2020 resource estimate of 31 million tonnes Indicated at 0.65 g/t gold, 0.07% copper, and 0.7 g/t silver.

Reasoning: The discovery of a new high-grade silver-gold vein system at the Proton Zone, although based on surface samples, indicates significant exploration potential. This is complemented by historical but strong drill results from the Nucleus deposit and an existing resource, suggesting overall project growth potential. However, the early-stage nature of the new discovery and the historical context of the drill and resource data temper the immediate impact.

Positive factors

  • New high-grade silver-gold vein discovery (Proton Zone)
  • Good historical drill intercepts from Nucleus deposit
  • Potential for resource growth at Nucleus
  • QA/QC procedures and QP sign-off disclosed

Negative factors

  • Proton Zone discovery is based on early-stage surface sampling
  • Drill results and resource estimate are historical (2021 and 2020 respectively)
  • Arsenic present at high levels in Proton Zone samples, indicating potential deleterious elements
  • Metal equivalent assumptions for 2021 drill results do not account for recovery losses

Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.

Facts used in scoring: 87

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 87. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (87)

Fact 1Freegold Mountain Project · goldGrade: 5.95Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Freegold Mountain Project
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
Yukon, Canada
Ticker
TIG

Geometry

Grade
5.95
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.3 m

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Proton Zone
Easting
380515
Northing
6914772
CRS
NAD83-8N
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-05-12T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This surface chip sample from a new discovery shows an exceptional gold grade, indicating significant exploration potential, but is very narrow and accompanied by extremely high arsenic.

Positive factors

  • New discovery with exceptional gold grade for surface sample

Negative factors

  • Early-stage surface chip sample (very narrow)
  • Extremely high arsenic content indicates potential deleterious element issues

Evidence · table

“5.95”

Context: C959831

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Fact 2Freegold Mountain Project · silverGrade: 7.17Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Freegold Mountain Project
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
Yukon, Canada
Ticker
TIG

Geometry

Grade
7.17
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.3 m

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Proton Zone
Easting
380515
Northing
6914772
CRS
NAD83-8N
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-05-12T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This surface chip sample from a new discovery shows a good silver grade, indicating exploration potential, but is very narrow and accompanied by extremely high arsenic.

Positive factors

  • New discovery with good silver grade for surface sample

Negative factors

  • Early-stage surface chip sample (very narrow)
  • Extremely high arsenic content indicates potential deleterious element issues

Evidence · table

“7.17”

Context: C959831

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Fact 3Freegold Mountain Project · copperGrade: 161Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Freegold Mountain Project
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
Yukon, Canada
Ticker
TIG

Geometry

Grade
161
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
0.3 m

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Proton Zone
Easting
380515
Northing
6914772
CRS
NAD83-8N
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-05-12T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This surface chip sample is part of a new discovery, but the copper grade is negligible, and extremely high arsenic is a concern.

Positive factors

  • New discovery in previously unexplored area

Negative factors

  • Early-stage surface chip sample (very narrow)
  • Copper grade is very low
  • Extremely high arsenic content indicates potential deleterious element issues

Evidence · table

“161”

Context: C959831

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Fact 4Freegold Mountain Project · arsenicGrade: 10000Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Freegold Mountain Project
Commodity
arsenic
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
Yukon, Canada
Ticker
TIG

Geometry

Grade
10000
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
0.3 m

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Proton Zone
Easting
380515
Northing
6914772
CRS
NAD83-8N
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-05-12T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The extremely high arsenic content in this new discovery sample is a major negative, indicating significant processing challenges or penalty elements.

Positive factors

  • New discovery in previously unexplored area

Negative factors

  • Early-stage surface chip sample (very narrow)
  • Extremely high arsenic content is a significant negative factor for processing

Evidence · table

“>10,000”

Context: C959831

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Fact 5Freegold Mountain Project · antimonyGrade: 38.8Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Freegold Mountain Project
Commodity
antimony
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
Yukon, Canada
Ticker
TIG

Geometry

Grade
38.8
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
0.3 m

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Proton Zone
Easting
380515
Northing
6914772
CRS
NAD83-8N
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-05-12T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Antimony is present in this new discovery sample, which could be a minor deleterious element, alongside extremely high arsenic.

Positive factors

  • New discovery in previously unexplored area

Negative factors

  • Early-stage surface chip sample (very narrow)
  • Antimony present as a deleterious element, alongside extremely high arsenic

Evidence · table

“38.8”

Context: C959831

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Fact 6Freegold Mountain Project · bismuthGrade: 49.6Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Freegold Mountain Project
Commodity
bismuth
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
Yukon, Canada
Ticker
TIG

Geometry

Grade
49.6
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
0.3 m

Classification

Sample Type
surface

Location

Location
Proton Zone
Easting
380515
Northing
6914772
CRS
NAD83-8N
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2025-05-12T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Bismuth is present in this new discovery sample, which is a minor component, alongside extremely high arsenic.

Positive factors

  • New discovery in previously unexplored area

Negative factors

  • Early-stage surface chip sample (very narrow)
  • Arsenic present as a deleterious element

Evidence · table

“49.6”

Context: C959831

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

N21-01Nucleus Deposit · goldGrade: 0.33Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 17.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
N21-01
Project
Nucleus Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
TIG

Geometry

Grade
0.33
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
17.5 m
From
21 m
To
38.5 m
Hole Depth
306.32 m
Intercept Depth
21 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
N21-01:21-38.5

Location

Easting
379458
Northing
6913364
CRS
NAD83-8N
Elevation
852 m
Azimuth
35 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.45
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq
Max Dilution
6 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-05-12T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a moderate gold grade over a good width, contributing to the overall understanding of the Nucleus deposit, but is not new information.

Positive factors

  • Moderate gold grade over a good width

Negative factors

  • Historical drill result (2021)
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not account for recovery losses

Evidence · table

“0.33”

Context: 17.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

N21-01Nucleus Deposit · silverGrade: 1.39Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 17.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
N21-01
Project
Nucleus Deposit
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
TIG

Geometry

Grade
1.39
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
17.5 m
From
21 m
To
38.5 m
Hole Depth
306.32 m
Intercept Depth
21 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
N21-01:21-38.5

Location

Easting
379458
Northing
6913364
CRS
NAD83-8N
Elevation
852 m
Azimuth
35 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.45
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq
Max Dilution
6 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-05-12T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a low silver grade over a good width, contributing to the overall understanding of the Nucleus deposit, but is not new information.

Negative factors

  • Historical drill result (2021)
  • Low silver grade
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not account for recovery losses

Evidence · table

“1.39”

Context: 17.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

N21-01Nucleus Deposit · copperGrade: 0.07Grade Unit: %Intercept: 17.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
N21-01
Project
Nucleus Deposit
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
TIG

Geometry

Grade
0.07
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
17.5 m
From
21 m
To
38.5 m
Hole Depth
306.32 m
Intercept Depth
21 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
N21-01:21-38.5

Location

Easting
379458
Northing
6913364
CRS
NAD83-8N
Elevation
852 m
Azimuth
35 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.45
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq
Max Dilution
6 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-05-12T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a low copper grade over a good width, contributing to the overall understanding of the Nucleus deposit, but is not new information.

Negative factors

  • Historical drill result (2021)
  • Low copper grade
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not account for recovery losses

Evidence · table

“0.07”

Context: 17.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

N21-01Nucleus Deposit · goldGrade: 0.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 27.25 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
N21-01
Project
Nucleus Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
TIG

Geometry

Grade
0.6
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
27.25 m
From
57 m
To
84.25 m
Hole Depth
306.32 m
Intercept Depth
21 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
N21-01:57-84.25

Location

Easting
379458
Northing
6913364
CRS
NAD83-8N
Elevation
852 m
Azimuth
35 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.75
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq
Max Dilution
6 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-05-12T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a moderate gold grade over a good width, contributing to the overall understanding of the Nucleus deposit, but is not new information.

Positive factors

  • Moderate gold grade over a good width

Negative factors

  • Historical drill result (2021)
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not account for recovery losses

Evidence · table

“0.60”

Context: 27.25

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

N21-01Nucleus Deposit · silverGrade: 1.65Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 27.25 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
N21-01
Project
Nucleus Deposit
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
TIG

Geometry

Grade
1.65
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
27.25 m
From
57 m
To
84.25 m
Hole Depth
306.32 m
Intercept Depth
21 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
N21-01:57-84.25

Location

Easting
379458
Northing
6913364
CRS
NAD83-8N
Elevation
852 m
Azimuth
35 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.75
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq
Max Dilution
6 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-05-12T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a low silver grade over a good width, contributing to the overall understanding of the Nucleus deposit, but is not new information.

Negative factors

  • Historical drill result (2021)
  • Low silver grade
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not account for recovery losses

Evidence · table

“1.65”

Context: 27.25

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

N21-01Nucleus Deposit · copperGrade: 0.08Grade Unit: %Intercept: 27.25 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
N21-01
Project
Nucleus Deposit
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
TIG

Geometry

Grade
0.08
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
27.25 m
From
57 m
To
84.25 m
Hole Depth
306.32 m
Intercept Depth
21 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
N21-01:57-84.25

Location

Easting
379458
Northing
6913364
CRS
NAD83-8N
Elevation
852 m
Azimuth
35 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.75
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq
Max Dilution
6 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-05-12T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a low copper grade over a good width, contributing to the overall understanding of the Nucleus deposit, but is not new information.

Negative factors

  • Historical drill result (2021)
  • Low copper grade
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not account for recovery losses

Evidence · table

“0.08”

Context: 27.25

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

N21-01Nucleus Deposit · goldGrade: 0.85Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 17.25 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
N21-01
Project
Nucleus Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
TIG

Geometry

Grade
0.85
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
17.25 m
From
67 m
To
84.25 m
Hole Depth
306.32 m
Intercept Depth
21 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
N21-01:67-84.25

Location

Easting
379458
Northing
6913364
CRS
NAD83-8N
Elevation
852 m
Azimuth
35 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.02
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq
Max Dilution
6 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-05-12T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical sub-interval shows a good gold grade over a good width, highlighting a higher-grade zone within the broader intercept, but is not new information.

Positive factors

  • Good gold grade over a good width (sub-interval)

Negative factors

  • Historical drill result (2021)
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not account for recovery losses

Evidence · table

“0.85”

Context: 17.25

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

N21-01Nucleus Deposit · silverGrade: 1.72Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 17.25 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
N21-01
Project
Nucleus Deposit
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
TIG

Geometry

Grade
1.72
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
17.25 m
From
67 m
To
84.25 m
Hole Depth
306.32 m
Intercept Depth
21 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
N21-01:67-84.25

Location

Easting
379458
Northing
6913364
CRS
NAD83-8N
Elevation
852 m
Azimuth
35 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.02
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq
Max Dilution
6 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-05-12T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical sub-interval shows a low silver grade over a good width, contributing to the overall understanding of the Nucleus deposit, but is not new information.

Negative factors

  • Historical drill result (2021)
  • Low silver grade
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not account for recovery losses

Evidence · table

“1.72”

Context: 17.25

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

N21-01Nucleus Deposit · copperGrade: 0.09Grade Unit: %Intercept: 17.25 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
N21-01
Project
Nucleus Deposit
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
TIG

Geometry

Grade
0.09
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
17.25 m
From
67 m
To
84.25 m
Hole Depth
306.32 m
Intercept Depth
21 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
N21-01:67-84.25

Location

Easting
379458
Northing
6913364
CRS
NAD83-8N
Elevation
852 m
Azimuth
35 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.02
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq
Max Dilution
6 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-05-12T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical sub-interval shows a low copper grade over a good width, contributing to the overall understanding of the Nucleus deposit, but is not new information.

Negative factors

  • Historical drill result (2021)
  • Low copper grade
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not account for recovery losses

Evidence · table

“0.09”

Context: 17.25

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

N21-01Nucleus Deposit · goldGrade: 0.11Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.73 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
N21-01
Project
Nucleus Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
TIG

Geometry

Grade
0.11
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.73 m
From
218 m
To
224.7 m
Hole Depth
306.32 m
Intercept Depth
21 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
N21-01:218-224.7

Location

Easting
379458
Northing
6913364
CRS
NAD83-8N
Elevation
852 m
Azimuth
35 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.29
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq
Max Dilution
6 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-05-12T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a low gold grade, contributing to the overall understanding of the Nucleus deposit, but is not new information and is below the cutoff.

Negative factors

  • Historical drill result (2021)
  • Low gold grade
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not account for recovery losses

Evidence · table

“0.11”

Context: 6.73

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

N21-01Nucleus Deposit · silverGrade: 1.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.73 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
N21-01
Project
Nucleus Deposit
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
TIG

Geometry

Grade
1.2
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.73 m
From
218 m
To
224.7 m
Hole Depth
306.32 m
Intercept Depth
21 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
N21-01:218-224.7

Location

Easting
379458
Northing
6913364
CRS
NAD83-8N
Elevation
852 m
Azimuth
35 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.29
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq
Max Dilution
6 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-05-12T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a low silver grade, contributing to the overall understanding of the Nucleus deposit, but is not new information and is below the cutoff.

Negative factors

  • Historical drill result (2021)
  • Low silver grade
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not account for recovery losses

Evidence · table

“1.20”

Context: 6.73

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

N21-01Nucleus Deposit · copperGrade: 0.11Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.73 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
N21-01
Project
Nucleus Deposit
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
TIG

Geometry

Grade
0.11
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
6.73 m
From
218 m
To
224.7 m
Hole Depth
306.32 m
Intercept Depth
21 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
N21-01:218-224.7

Location

Easting
379458
Northing
6913364
CRS
NAD83-8N
Elevation
852 m
Azimuth
35 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.29
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq
Max Dilution
6 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-05-12T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a low copper grade, contributing to the overall understanding of the Nucleus deposit, but is not new information and is below the cutoff.

Negative factors

  • Historical drill result (2021)
  • Low copper grade
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not account for recovery losses

Evidence · table

“0.11”

Context: 6.73

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

N21-01Nucleus Deposit · goldGrade: 0.24Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
N21-01
Project
Nucleus Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
TIG

Geometry

Grade
0.24
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.5 m
From
268 m
To
272.5 m
Hole Depth
306.32 m
Intercept Depth
21 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
N21-01:268-272.5

Location

Easting
379458
Northing
6913364
CRS
NAD83-8N
Elevation
852 m
Azimuth
35 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.52
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq
Max Dilution
6 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-05-12T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a low gold grade, contributing to the overall understanding of the Nucleus deposit, but is not new information and is below the cutoff.

Negative factors

  • Historical drill result (2021)
  • Low gold grade
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not account for recovery losses

Evidence · table

“0.24”

Context: 4.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

N21-01Nucleus Deposit · silverGrade: 1.72Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
N21-01
Project
Nucleus Deposit
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
TIG

Geometry

Grade
1.72
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.5 m
From
268 m
To
272.5 m
Hole Depth
306.32 m
Intercept Depth
21 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
N21-01:268-272.5

Location

Easting
379458
Northing
6913364
CRS
NAD83-8N
Elevation
852 m
Azimuth
35 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.52
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq
Max Dilution
6 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-05-12T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a low silver grade, contributing to the overall understanding of the Nucleus deposit, but is not new information and is below the cutoff.

Negative factors

  • Historical drill result (2021)
  • Low silver grade
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not account for recovery losses

Evidence · table

“1.72”

Context: 4.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

N21-01Nucleus Deposit · copperGrade: 0.16Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
N21-01
Project
Nucleus Deposit
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
TIG

Geometry

Grade
0.16
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4.5 m
From
268 m
To
272.5 m
Hole Depth
306.32 m
Intercept Depth
21 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
N21-01:268-272.5

Location

Easting
379458
Northing
6913364
CRS
NAD83-8N
Elevation
852 m
Azimuth
35 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.52
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq
Max Dilution
6 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-05-12T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a low copper grade, contributing to the overall understanding of the Nucleus deposit, but is not new information and is below the cutoff.

Negative factors

  • Historical drill result (2021)
  • Low copper grade
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not account for recovery losses

Evidence · table

“0.16”

Context: 4.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

N21-02Nucleus Deposit · goldGrade: 0.71Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 31.26 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
N21-02
Project
Nucleus Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
TIG

Geometry

Grade
0.71
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
31.26 m
From
15.24 m
To
46.5 m
Hole Depth
449.58 m
Intercept Depth
15.24 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
N21-02:15.24-46.5

Location

Easting
379120
Northing
6913528
CRS
NAD83-8N
Elevation
951 m
Azimuth
30 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.76
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq
Max Dilution
6 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-05-12T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a moderate gold grade over a good width, contributing to the overall understanding of the Nucleus deposit, but is not new information.

Positive factors

  • Moderate gold grade over a good width

Negative factors

  • Historical drill result (2021)
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not account for recovery losses

Evidence · table

“0.71”

Context: 31.26

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

N21-02Nucleus Deposit · silverGrade: 0.67Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 31.26 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
N21-02
Project
Nucleus Deposit
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
TIG

Geometry

Grade
0.67
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
31.26 m
From
15.24 m
To
46.5 m
Hole Depth
449.58 m
Intercept Depth
15.24 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
N21-02:15.24-46.5

Location

Easting
379120
Northing
6913528
CRS
NAD83-8N
Elevation
951 m
Azimuth
30 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.76
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq
Max Dilution
6 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-05-12T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a very low silver grade over a good width, contributing to the overall understanding of the Nucleus deposit, but is not new information.

Negative factors

  • Historical drill result (2021)
  • Very low silver grade
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not account for recovery losses

Evidence · table

“0.67”

Context: 31.26

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

N21-02Nucleus Deposit · copperGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 31.26 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
N21-02
Project
Nucleus Deposit
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
TIG

Geometry

Grade
0.02
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
31.26 m
From
15.24 m
To
46.5 m
Hole Depth
449.58 m
Intercept Depth
15.24 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
N21-02:15.24-46.5

Location

Easting
379120
Northing
6913528
CRS
NAD83-8N
Elevation
951 m
Azimuth
30 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.76
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq
Max Dilution
6 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-05-12T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a very low copper grade over a good width, contributing to the overall understanding of the Nucleus deposit, but is not new information.

Negative factors

  • Historical drill result (2021)
  • Very low copper grade
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not account for recovery losses

Evidence · table

“0.02”

Context: 31.26

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

N21-02Nucleus Deposit · goldGrade: 2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
N21-02
Project
Nucleus Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
TIG

Geometry

Grade
2
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.5 m
From
28.5 m
To
33 m
Hole Depth
449.58 m
Intercept Depth
15.24 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
N21-02:28.5-33

Location

Easting
379120
Northing
6913528
CRS
NAD83-8N
Elevation
951 m
Azimuth
30 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.1
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq
Max Dilution
6 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-05-12T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical sub-interval shows a strong gold grade over a moderate width, highlighting a significant higher-grade zone within the broader intercept, but is not new information.

Positive factors

  • Strong gold grade over a moderate width (sub-interval)

Negative factors

  • Historical drill result (2021)
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not account for recovery losses

Evidence · table

“2.00”

Context: 4.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

N21-02Nucleus Deposit · silverGrade: 1.57Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
N21-02
Project
Nucleus Deposit
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
TIG

Geometry

Grade
1.57
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.5 m
From
28.5 m
To
33 m
Hole Depth
449.58 m
Intercept Depth
15.24 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
N21-02:28.5-33

Location

Easting
379120
Northing
6913528
CRS
NAD83-8N
Elevation
951 m
Azimuth
30 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.1
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq
Max Dilution
6 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-05-12T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical sub-interval shows a low silver grade over a moderate width, contributing to the overall understanding of the Nucleus deposit, but is not new information.

Negative factors

  • Historical drill result (2021)
  • Low silver grade
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not account for recovery losses

Evidence · table

“1.57”

Context: 4.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

N21-02Nucleus Deposit · copperGrade: 0.05Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
N21-02
Project
Nucleus Deposit
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
TIG

Geometry

Grade
0.05
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4.5 m
From
28.5 m
To
33 m
Hole Depth
449.58 m
Intercept Depth
15.24 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
N21-02:28.5-33

Location

Easting
379120
Northing
6913528
CRS
NAD83-8N
Elevation
951 m
Azimuth
30 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.1
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq
Max Dilution
6 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-05-12T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical sub-interval shows a low copper grade over a moderate width, contributing to the overall understanding of the Nucleus deposit, but is not new information.

Negative factors

  • Historical drill result (2021)
  • Low copper grade
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not account for recovery losses

Evidence · table

“0.05”

Context: 4.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

N21-02Nucleus Deposit · goldGrade: 1.08Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.95 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
N21-02
Project
Nucleus Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
TIG

Geometry

Grade
1.08
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.95 m
From
61.5 m
To
65.45 m
Hole Depth
449.58 m
Intercept Depth
15.24 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
N21-02:61.5-65.45

Location

Easting
379120
Northing
6913528
CRS
NAD83-8N
Elevation
951 m
Azimuth
30 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.3
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq
Max Dilution
6 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-05-12T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a good gold grade over a narrow width, contributing to the overall understanding of the Nucleus deposit, but is not new information.

Positive factors

  • Good gold grade over a narrow width

Negative factors

  • Historical drill result (2021)
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not account for recovery losses

Evidence · table

“1.08”

Context: 3.95

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

N21-02Nucleus Deposit · silverGrade: 2.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.95 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
N21-02
Project
Nucleus Deposit
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
TIG

Geometry

Grade
2.2
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.95 m
From
61.5 m
To
65.45 m
Hole Depth
449.58 m
Intercept Depth
15.24 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
N21-02:61.5-65.45

Location

Easting
379120
Northing
6913528
CRS
NAD83-8N
Elevation
951 m
Azimuth
30 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.3
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq
Max Dilution
6 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-05-12T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a low silver grade over a narrow width, contributing to the overall understanding of the Nucleus deposit, but is not new information.

Negative factors

  • Historical drill result (2021)
  • Low silver grade
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not account for recovery losses

Evidence · table

“2.20”

Context: 3.95

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

N21-02Nucleus Deposit · copperGrade: 0.12Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.95 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
N21-02
Project
Nucleus Deposit
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
TIG

Geometry

Grade
0.12
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3.95 m
From
61.5 m
To
65.45 m
Hole Depth
449.58 m
Intercept Depth
15.24 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
N21-02:61.5-65.45

Location

Easting
379120
Northing
6913528
CRS
NAD83-8N
Elevation
951 m
Azimuth
30 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.3
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq
Max Dilution
6 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-05-12T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a low copper grade over a narrow width, contributing to the overall understanding of the Nucleus deposit, but is not new information.

Negative factors

  • Historical drill result (2021)
  • Low copper grade
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not account for recovery losses

Evidence · table

“0.12”

Context: 3.95

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

N21-02Nucleus Deposit · goldGrade: 0.74Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.37 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
N21-02
Project
Nucleus Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
TIG

Geometry

Grade
0.74
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5.37 m
From
114.08 m
To
119.5 m
Hole Depth
449.58 m
Intercept Depth
15.24 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
N21-02:114.08-119.5

Location

Easting
379120
Northing
6913528
CRS
NAD83-8N
Elevation
951 m
Azimuth
30 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.79
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq
Max Dilution
6 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-05-12T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a moderate gold grade over a moderate width, contributing to the overall understanding of the Nucleus deposit, but is not new information.

Positive factors

  • Moderate gold grade over a moderate width

Negative factors

  • Historical drill result (2021)
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not account for recovery losses

Evidence · table

“0.74”

Context: 5.37

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

N21-02Nucleus Deposit · silverGrade: 0.39Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.37 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
N21-02
Project
Nucleus Deposit
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
TIG

Geometry

Grade
0.39
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5.37 m
From
114.08 m
To
119.5 m
Hole Depth
449.58 m
Intercept Depth
15.24 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
N21-02:114.08-119.5

Location

Easting
379120
Northing
6913528
CRS
NAD83-8N
Elevation
951 m
Azimuth
30 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.79
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq
Max Dilution
6 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-05-12T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a very low silver grade over a moderate width, contributing to the overall understanding of the Nucleus deposit, but is not new information.

Negative factors

  • Historical drill result (2021)
  • Very low silver grade
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not account for recovery losses

Evidence · table

“0.39”

Context: 5.37

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

N21-02Nucleus Deposit · copperGrade: 0.03Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.37 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
N21-02
Project
Nucleus Deposit
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
TIG

Geometry

Grade
0.03
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
5.37 m
From
114.08 m
To
119.5 m
Hole Depth
449.58 m
Intercept Depth
15.24 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
N21-02:114.08-119.5

Location

Easting
379120
Northing
6913528
CRS
NAD83-8N
Elevation
951 m
Azimuth
30 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.79
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq
Max Dilution
6 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-05-12T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a very low copper grade over a moderate width, contributing to the overall understanding of the Nucleus deposit, but is not new information.

Negative factors

  • Historical drill result (2021)
  • Very low copper grade
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not account for recovery losses

Evidence · table

“0.03”

Context: 5.37

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

N21-02Nucleus Deposit · goldGrade: 0.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13.29 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
N21-02
Project
Nucleus Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
TIG

Geometry

Grade
0.9
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
13.29 m
From
223.41 m
To
236.7 m
Hole Depth
449.58 m
Intercept Depth
15.24 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
N21-02:223.41-236.7

Location

Easting
379120
Northing
6913528
CRS
NAD83-8N
Elevation
951 m
Azimuth
30 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.17
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq
Max Dilution
6 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-05-12T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a good gold grade over a good width, contributing to the overall understanding of the Nucleus deposit, but is not new information.

Positive factors

  • Good gold grade over a good width

Negative factors

  • Historical drill result (2021)
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not account for recovery losses

Evidence · table

“0.90”

Context: 13.29

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

N21-02Nucleus Deposit · silverGrade: 1.24Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13.29 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
N21-02
Project
Nucleus Deposit
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
TIG

Geometry

Grade
1.24
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
13.29 m
From
223.41 m
To
236.7 m
Hole Depth
449.58 m
Intercept Depth
15.24 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
N21-02:223.41-236.7

Location

Easting
379120
Northing
6913528
CRS
NAD83-8N
Elevation
951 m
Azimuth
30 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.17
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq
Max Dilution
6 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-05-12T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a low silver grade over a good width, contributing to the overall understanding of the Nucleus deposit, but is not new information.

Negative factors

  • Historical drill result (2021)
  • Low silver grade
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not account for recovery losses

Evidence · table

“2.24”

Context: 13.29

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

N21-02Nucleus Deposit · copperGrade: 0.16Grade Unit: %Intercept: 13.29 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
N21-02
Project
Nucleus Deposit
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
TIG

Geometry

Grade
0.16
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
13.29 m
From
223.41 m
To
236.7 m
Hole Depth
449.58 m
Intercept Depth
15.24 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
N21-02:223.41-236.7

Location

Easting
379120
Northing
6913528
CRS
NAD83-8N
Elevation
951 m
Azimuth
30 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.17
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq
Max Dilution
6 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-05-12T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a low copper grade over a good width, contributing to the overall understanding of the Nucleus deposit, but is not new information.

Negative factors

  • Historical drill result (2021)
  • Low copper grade
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not account for recovery losses

Evidence · table

“0.16”

Context: 13.29

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

N21-02Nucleus Deposit · goldGrade: 1.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
N21-02
Project
Nucleus Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
TIG

Geometry

Grade
1.25
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.9 m
From
228.8 m
To
236.7 m
Hole Depth
449.58 m
Intercept Depth
15.24 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
N21-02:228.8-236.7

Location

Easting
379120
Northing
6913528
CRS
NAD83-8N
Elevation
951 m
Azimuth
30 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.58
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq
Max Dilution
6 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-05-12T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical sub-interval shows a good gold grade over a good width, highlighting a higher-grade zone within the broader intercept, but is not new information.

Positive factors

  • Good gold grade over a good width (sub-interval)

Negative factors

  • Historical drill result (2021)
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not account for recovery losses

Evidence · table

“1.25”

Context: 7.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

N21-02Nucleus Deposit · silverGrade: 3.15Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
N21-02
Project
Nucleus Deposit
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
TIG

Geometry

Grade
3.15
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.9 m
From
228.8 m
To
236.7 m
Hole Depth
449.58 m
Intercept Depth
15.24 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
N21-02:228.8-236.7

Location

Easting
379120
Northing
6913528
CRS
NAD83-8N
Elevation
951 m
Azimuth
30 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.58
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq
Max Dilution
6 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-05-12T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical sub-interval shows a low silver grade over a good width, contributing to the overall understanding of the Nucleus deposit, but is not new information.

Negative factors

  • Historical drill result (2021)
  • Low silver grade
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not account for recovery losses

Evidence · table

“3.15”

Context: 7.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

N21-02Nucleus Deposit · copperGrade: 0.19Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
N21-02
Project
Nucleus Deposit
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
TIG

Geometry

Grade
0.19
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
7.9 m
From
228.8 m
To
236.7 m
Hole Depth
449.58 m
Intercept Depth
15.24 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
N21-02:228.8-236.7

Location

Easting
379120
Northing
6913528
CRS
NAD83-8N
Elevation
951 m
Azimuth
30 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.58
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq
Max Dilution
6 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-05-12T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical sub-interval shows a low copper grade over a good width, contributing to the overall understanding of the Nucleus deposit, but is not new information.

Negative factors

  • Historical drill result (2021)
  • Low copper grade
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not account for recovery losses

Evidence · table

“0.19”

Context: 7.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

N21-03Nucleus Deposit · goldGrade: 0.48Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 18.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
N21-03
Project
Nucleus Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
TIG

Geometry

Grade
0.48
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
18.9 m
From
90.1 m
To
109 m
Hole Depth
320.43 m
Intercept Depth
90.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
N21-03:90.1-109

Location

Easting
379162
Northing
6913073
CRS
NAD83-8N
Elevation
895 m
Azimuth
210 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.55
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq
Max Dilution
6 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-05-12T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a moderate gold grade over a good width, contributing to the overall understanding of the Nucleus deposit, but is not new information and is below the cutoff.

Positive factors

  • Moderate gold grade over a good width

Negative factors

  • Historical drill result (2021)
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not account for recovery losses
  • Gold grade is below the 0.5 g/t AuEq cutoff

Evidence · table

“0.48”

Context: 18.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

N21-03Nucleus Deposit · silverGrade: 0.54Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 18.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
N21-03
Project
Nucleus Deposit
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
TIG

Geometry

Grade
0.54
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
18.9 m
From
90.1 m
To
109 m
Hole Depth
320.43 m
Intercept Depth
90.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
N21-03:90.1-109

Location

Easting
379162
Northing
6913073
CRS
NAD83-8N
Elevation
895 m
Azimuth
210 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.55
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq
Max Dilution
6 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-05-12T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a very low silver grade over a good width, contributing to the overall understanding of the Nucleus deposit, but is not new information.

Negative factors

  • Historical drill result (2021)
  • Very low silver grade
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not account for recovery losses

Evidence · table

“0.54”

Context: 18.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

N21-03Nucleus Deposit · copperGrade: 0.04Grade Unit: %Intercept: 18.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
N21-03
Project
Nucleus Deposit
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
TIG

Geometry

Grade
0.04
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
18.9 m
From
90.1 m
To
109 m
Hole Depth
320.43 m
Intercept Depth
90.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
N21-03:90.1-109

Location

Easting
379162
Northing
6913073
CRS
NAD83-8N
Elevation
895 m
Azimuth
210 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.55
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq
Max Dilution
6 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-05-12T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a very low copper grade over a good width, contributing to the overall understanding of the Nucleus deposit, but is not new information.

Negative factors

  • Historical drill result (2021)
  • Very low copper grade
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not account for recovery losses

Evidence · table

“0.04”

Context: 18.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

N21-03Nucleus Deposit · goldGrade: 0.93Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
N21-03
Project
Nucleus Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
TIG

Geometry

Grade
0.93
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5.4 m
From
90.1 m
To
95.5 m
Hole Depth
320.43 m
Intercept Depth
90.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
N21-03:90.1-95.5

Location

Easting
379162
Northing
6913073
CRS
NAD83-8N
Elevation
895 m
Azimuth
210 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq
Max Dilution
6 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-05-12T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical sub-interval shows a good gold grade over a moderate width, highlighting a higher-grade zone within the broader intercept, but is not new information and is below the cutoff.

Positive factors

  • Good gold grade over a moderate width (sub-interval)

Negative factors

  • Historical drill result (2021)
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not account for recovery losses
  • Gold grade is below the 1.0 g/t AuEq cutoff

Evidence · table

“0.93”

Context: 5.4

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

N21-03Nucleus Deposit · silverGrade: 0.57Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
N21-03
Project
Nucleus Deposit
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
TIG

Geometry

Grade
0.57
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5.4 m
From
90.1 m
To
95.5 m
Hole Depth
320.43 m
Intercept Depth
90.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
N21-03:90.1-95.5

Location

Easting
379162
Northing
6913073
CRS
NAD83-8N
Elevation
895 m
Azimuth
210 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq
Max Dilution
6 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-05-12T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical sub-interval shows a very low silver grade over a moderate width, contributing to the overall understanding of the Nucleus deposit, but is not new information.

Negative factors

  • Historical drill result (2021)
  • Very low silver grade
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not account for recovery losses

Evidence · table

“0.57”

Context: 5.4

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

N21-03Nucleus Deposit · copperGrade: 0.04Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
N21-03
Project
Nucleus Deposit
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
TIG

Geometry

Grade
0.04
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
5.4 m
From
90.1 m
To
95.5 m
Hole Depth
320.43 m
Intercept Depth
90.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
N21-03:90.1-95.5

Location

Easting
379162
Northing
6913073
CRS
NAD83-8N
Elevation
895 m
Azimuth
210 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq
Max Dilution
6 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-05-12T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical sub-interval shows a very low copper grade over a moderate width, contributing to the overall understanding of the Nucleus deposit, but is not new information.

Negative factors

  • Historical drill result (2021)
  • Very low copper grade
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not account for recovery losses

Evidence · table

“0.04”

Context: 5.4

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

N21-04Nucleus Deposit · goldGrade: 1.18Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
N21-04
Project
Nucleus Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
TIG

Geometry

Grade
1.18
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m
From
135.5 m
To
138.5 m
Hole Depth
295.66 m
Intercept Depth
135.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
N21-04:135.5-138.5

Location

Easting
379162
Northing
6913073
CRS
NAD83-8N
Elevation
895 m
Azimuth
30 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.24
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq
Max Dilution
6 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-05-12T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a good gold grade over a narrow width, contributing to the overall understanding of the Nucleus deposit, but is not new information.

Positive factors

  • Good gold grade over a narrow width

Negative factors

  • Historical drill result (2021)
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not account for recovery losses

Evidence · table

“1.18”

Context: 3

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

N21-04Nucleus Deposit · silverGrade: 0.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
N21-04
Project
Nucleus Deposit
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
TIG

Geometry

Grade
0.25
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m
From
135.5 m
To
138.5 m
Hole Depth
295.66 m
Intercept Depth
135.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
N21-04:135.5-138.5

Location

Easting
379162
Northing
6913073
CRS
NAD83-8N
Elevation
895 m
Azimuth
30 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.24
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq
Max Dilution
6 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-05-12T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a very low silver grade over a narrow width, contributing to the overall understanding of the Nucleus deposit, but is not new information.

Negative factors

  • Historical drill result (2021)
  • Very low silver grade
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not account for recovery losses

Evidence · table

“0.25”

Context: 3

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

N21-04Nucleus Deposit · copperGrade: 0.03Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
N21-04
Project
Nucleus Deposit
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
TIG

Geometry

Grade
0.03
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3 m
From
135.5 m
To
138.5 m
Hole Depth
295.66 m
Intercept Depth
135.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
N21-04:135.5-138.5

Location

Easting
379162
Northing
6913073
CRS
NAD83-8N
Elevation
895 m
Azimuth
30 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.24
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq
Max Dilution
6 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-05-12T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a very low copper grade over a narrow width, contributing to the overall understanding of the Nucleus deposit, but is not new information.

Negative factors

  • Historical drill result (2021)
  • Very low copper grade
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not account for recovery losses

Evidence · table

“0.03”

Context: 3

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

N21-06Nucleus Deposit · goldGrade: 0.87Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.73 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
N21-06
Project
Nucleus Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
TIG

Geometry

Grade
0.87
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.73 m
From
276.38 m
To
280.1 m
Hole Depth
316.99 m
Intercept Depth
276.38 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
N21-06:276.38-280.1

Location

Easting
378859
Northing
6913336
CRS
NAD83-8N
Elevation
974 m
Azimuth
40 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.22
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq
Max Dilution
6 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-05-12T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a good gold grade over a narrow width, contributing to the overall understanding of the Nucleus deposit, but is not new information.

Positive factors

  • Good gold grade over a narrow width

Negative factors

  • Historical drill result (2021)
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not account for recovery losses

Evidence · table

“0.87”

Context: 3.73

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

N21-06Nucleus Deposit · silverGrade: 1.85Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.73 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
N21-06
Project
Nucleus Deposit
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
TIG

Geometry

Grade
1.85
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.73 m
From
276.38 m
To
280.1 m
Hole Depth
316.99 m
Intercept Depth
276.38 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
N21-06:276.38-280.1

Location

Easting
378859
Northing
6913336
CRS
NAD83-8N
Elevation
974 m
Azimuth
40 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.22
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq
Max Dilution
6 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-05-12T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a low silver grade over a narrow width, contributing to the overall understanding of the Nucleus deposit, but is not new information.

Negative factors

  • Historical drill result (2021)
  • Low silver grade
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not account for recovery losses

Evidence · table

“1.85”

Context: 3.73

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

N21-06Nucleus Deposit · copperGrade: 0.21Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.73 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
N21-06
Project
Nucleus Deposit
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
TIG

Geometry

Grade
0.21
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3.73 m
From
276.38 m
To
280.1 m
Hole Depth
316.99 m
Intercept Depth
276.38 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
N21-06:276.38-280.1

Location

Easting
378859
Northing
6913336
CRS
NAD83-8N
Elevation
974 m
Azimuth
40 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.22
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq
Max Dilution
6 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-05-12T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a low copper grade over a narrow width, contributing to the overall understanding of the Nucleus deposit, but is not new information.

Negative factors

  • Historical drill result (2021)
  • Low copper grade
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not account for recovery losses

Evidence · table

“0.21”

Context: 3.73

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

N21-07Nucleus Deposit · goldGrade: 0.43Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
N21-07
Project
Nucleus Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
TIG

Geometry

Grade
0.43
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7 m
From
75 m
To
82 m
Hole Depth
312.42 m
Intercept Depth
75 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
N21-07:75-82

Location

Easting
379111
Northing
6914021
CRS
NAD83-8N
Elevation
1003 m
Azimuth
70 °
Dip
-70 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.46
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq
Max Dilution
6 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-05-12T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a low gold grade over a moderate width, contributing to the overall understanding of the Nucleus deposit, but is not new information and is below the cutoff.

Negative factors

  • Historical drill result (2021)
  • Low gold grade
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not account for recovery losses
  • Gold grade is below the 0.5 g/t AuEq cutoff

Evidence · table

“0.43”

Context: 7

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

N21-07Nucleus Deposit · silverGrade: 0.59Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
N21-07
Project
Nucleus Deposit
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
TIG

Geometry

Grade
0.59
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7 m
From
75 m
To
82 m
Hole Depth
312.42 m
Intercept Depth
75 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
N21-07:75-82

Location

Easting
379111
Northing
6914021
CRS
NAD83-8N
Elevation
1003 m
Azimuth
70 °
Dip
-70 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.46
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq
Max Dilution
6 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-05-12T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a very low silver grade over a moderate width, contributing to the overall understanding of the Nucleus deposit, but is not new information.

Negative factors

  • Historical drill result (2021)
  • Very low silver grade
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not account for recovery losses

Evidence · table

“0.59”

Context: 7

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

N21-07Nucleus Deposit · copperGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
N21-07
Project
Nucleus Deposit
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
TIG

Geometry

Grade
0.01
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
7 m
From
75 m
To
82 m
Hole Depth
312.42 m
Intercept Depth
75 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
N21-07:75-82

Location

Easting
379111
Northing
6914021
CRS
NAD83-8N
Elevation
1003 m
Azimuth
70 °
Dip
-70 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.46
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq
Max Dilution
6 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-05-12T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a very low copper grade over a moderate width, contributing to the overall understanding of the Nucleus deposit, but is not new information.

Negative factors

  • Historical drill result (2021)
  • Very low copper grade
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not account for recovery losses

Evidence · table

“0.01”

Context: 7

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

N21-08Nucleus Deposit · goldGrade: 0.66Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 16.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
N21-08
Project
Nucleus Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
TIG

Geometry

Grade
0.66
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
16.5 m
From
70 m
To
86.5 m
Hole Depth
327.5 m
Intercept Depth
70 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
N21-08:70-86.5

Location

Easting
379566
Northing
6914430
CRS
NAD83-8N
Elevation
902 m
Azimuth
60 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.66
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq
Max Dilution
6 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-05-12T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a moderate gold grade over a good width, contributing to the overall understanding of the Nucleus deposit, but is not new information.

Positive factors

  • Moderate gold grade over a good width

Negative factors

  • Historical drill result (2021)
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not account for recovery losses

Evidence · table

“0.66”

Context: 16.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

N21-08Nucleus Deposit · silverGrade: 0.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 16.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
N21-08
Project
Nucleus Deposit
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
TIG

Geometry

Grade
0.25
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
16.5 m
From
70 m
To
86.5 m
Hole Depth
327.5 m
Intercept Depth
70 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
N21-08:70-86.5

Location

Easting
379566
Northing
6914430
CRS
NAD83-8N
Elevation
902 m
Azimuth
60 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.66
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq
Max Dilution
6 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-05-12T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a very low silver grade over a good width, contributing to the overall understanding of the Nucleus deposit, but is not new information.

Negative factors

  • Historical drill result (2021)
  • Very low silver grade
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not account for recovery losses

Evidence · table

“0.25”

Context: 16.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

N21-08Nucleus Deposit · copperGrade: 0Grade Unit: %Intercept: 16.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
N21-08
Project
Nucleus Deposit
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
TIG

Geometry

Grade
0
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
16.5 m
From
70 m
To
86.5 m
Hole Depth
327.5 m
Intercept Depth
70 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
N21-08:70-86.5

Location

Easting
379566
Northing
6914430
CRS
NAD83-8N
Elevation
902 m
Azimuth
60 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.66
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq
Max Dilution
6 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-05-12T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows no copper grade over a good width, contributing to the overall understanding of the Nucleus deposit, but is not new information.

Negative factors

  • Historical drill result (2021)
  • No copper grade reported
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not account for recovery losses

Evidence · table

“0.00”

Context: 16.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

N21-08Nucleus Deposit · goldGrade: 0.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
N21-08
Project
Nucleus Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
TIG

Geometry

Grade
0.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
12 m
From
70 m
To
82 m
Hole Depth
327.5 m
Intercept Depth
70 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
N21-08:70-82

Location

Easting
379566
Northing
6914430
CRS
NAD83-8N
Elevation
902 m
Azimuth
60 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.71
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq
Max Dilution
6 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-05-12T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical sub-interval shows a moderate gold grade over a good width, contributing to the overall understanding of the Nucleus deposit, but is not new information and is below the cutoff.

Positive factors

  • Moderate gold grade over a good width (sub-interval)

Negative factors

  • Historical drill result (2021)
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not account for recovery losses
  • Gold grade is below the 1.0 g/t AuEq cutoff

Evidence · table

“0.70”

Context: 12

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

N21-08Nucleus Deposit · silverGrade: 0.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
N21-08
Project
Nucleus Deposit
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
TIG

Geometry

Grade
0.25
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
12 m
From
70 m
To
82 m
Hole Depth
327.5 m
Intercept Depth
70 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
N21-08:70-82

Location

Easting
379566
Northing
6914430
CRS
NAD83-8N
Elevation
902 m
Azimuth
60 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.71
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq
Max Dilution
6 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-05-12T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical sub-interval shows a very low silver grade over a good width, contributing to the overall understanding of the Nucleus deposit, but is not new information.

Negative factors

  • Historical drill result (2021)
  • Very low silver grade
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not account for recovery losses

Evidence · table

“0.25”

Context: 12

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

N21-08Nucleus Deposit · copperGrade: 0Grade Unit: %Intercept: 12 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
N21-08
Project
Nucleus Deposit
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
TIG

Geometry

Grade
0
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
12 m
From
70 m
To
82 m
Hole Depth
327.5 m
Intercept Depth
70 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
N21-08:70-82

Location

Easting
379566
Northing
6914430
CRS
NAD83-8N
Elevation
902 m
Azimuth
60 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.71
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq
Max Dilution
6 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-05-12T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical sub-interval shows no copper grade over a good width, contributing to the overall understanding of the Nucleus deposit, but is not new information.

Negative factors

  • Historical drill result (2021)
  • No copper grade reported
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not account for recovery losses

Evidence · table

“0.00”

Context: 12

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

N21-09Nucleus Deposit · goldGrade: 0.87Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
N21-09
Project
Nucleus Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
TIG

Geometry

Grade
0.87
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m
From
85.5 m
To
88.5 m
Hole Depth
215.49 m
Intercept Depth
85.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
N21-09:85.5-88.5

Location

Easting
379666
Northing
6914527
CRS
NAD83-8N
Elevation
860 m
Azimuth
45 °
Dip
-70 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.89
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq
Max Dilution
6 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-05-12T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a good gold grade over a narrow width, contributing to the overall understanding of the Nucleus deposit, but is not new information.

Positive factors

  • Good gold grade over a narrow width

Negative factors

  • Historical drill result (2021)
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not account for recovery losses

Evidence · table

“0.87”

Context: 3

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

N21-09Nucleus Deposit · silverGrade: 0.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
N21-09
Project
Nucleus Deposit
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
TIG

Geometry

Grade
0.25
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m
From
85.5 m
To
88.5 m
Hole Depth
215.49 m
Intercept Depth
85.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
N21-09:85.5-88.5

Location

Easting
379666
Northing
6914527
CRS
NAD83-8N
Elevation
860 m
Azimuth
45 °
Dip
-70 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.89
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq
Max Dilution
6 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-05-12T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a very low silver grade over a narrow width, contributing to the overall understanding of the Nucleus deposit, but is not new information.

Negative factors

  • Historical drill result (2021)
  • Very low silver grade
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not account for recovery losses

Evidence · table

“0.25”

Context: 3

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

N21-09Nucleus Deposit · copperGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
N21-09
Project
Nucleus Deposit
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
TIG

Geometry

Grade
0.01
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3 m
From
85.5 m
To
88.5 m
Hole Depth
215.49 m
Intercept Depth
85.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
N21-09:85.5-88.5

Location

Easting
379666
Northing
6914527
CRS
NAD83-8N
Elevation
860 m
Azimuth
45 °
Dip
-70 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.89
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq
Max Dilution
6 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-05-12T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a very low copper grade over a narrow width, contributing to the overall understanding of the Nucleus deposit, but is not new information.

Negative factors

  • Historical drill result (2021)
  • Very low copper grade
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not account for recovery losses

Evidence · table

“0.01”

Context: 3

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

N21-09Nucleus Deposit · goldGrade: 0.33Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
N21-09
Project
Nucleus Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
TIG

Geometry

Grade
0.33
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10 m
From
153 m
To
163 m
Hole Depth
215.49 m
Intercept Depth
85.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
N21-09:153-163

Location

Easting
379666
Northing
6914527
CRS
NAD83-8N
Elevation
860 m
Azimuth
45 °
Dip
-70 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.46
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq
Max Dilution
6 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-05-12T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a low gold grade over a moderate width, contributing to the overall understanding of the Nucleus deposit, but is not new information and is below the cutoff.

Negative factors

  • Historical drill result (2021)
  • Low gold grade
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not account for recovery losses
  • Gold grade is below the 0.5 g/t AuEq cutoff

Evidence · table

“0.33”

Context: 10

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

N21-09Nucleus Deposit · silverGrade: 0.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
N21-09
Project
Nucleus Deposit
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
TIG

Geometry

Grade
0.25
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10 m
From
153 m
To
163 m
Hole Depth
215.49 m
Intercept Depth
85.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
N21-09:153-163

Location

Easting
379666
Northing
6914527
CRS
NAD83-8N
Elevation
860 m
Azimuth
45 °
Dip
-70 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.46
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq
Max Dilution
6 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-05-12T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a very low silver grade over a moderate width, contributing to the overall understanding of the Nucleus deposit, but is not new information.

Negative factors

  • Historical drill result (2021)
  • Very low silver grade
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not account for recovery losses

Evidence · table

“0.25”

Context: 10

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

N21-09Nucleus Deposit · copperGrade: 0.08Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
N21-09
Project
Nucleus Deposit
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
TIG

Geometry

Grade
0.08
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
10 m
From
153 m
To
163 m
Hole Depth
215.49 m
Intercept Depth
85.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
N21-09:153-163

Location

Easting
379666
Northing
6914527
CRS
NAD83-8N
Elevation
860 m
Azimuth
45 °
Dip
-70 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.46
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq
Max Dilution
6 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-05-12T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a low copper grade over a moderate width, contributing to the overall understanding of the Nucleus deposit, but is not new information.

Negative factors

  • Historical drill result (2021)
  • Low copper grade
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not account for recovery losses

Evidence · table

“0.08”

Context: 10

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

N21-10Nucleus Deposit · goldGrade: 0.36Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
N21-10
Project
Nucleus Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
TIG

Geometry

Grade
0.36
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9 m
From
4 m
To
13 m
Hole Depth
257.86 m
Intercept Depth
4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
N21-10:4-13

Location

Easting
379525
Northing
6914090
CRS
NAD83-8N
Elevation
906 m
Azimuth
210 °
Dip
-70 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.41
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq
Max Dilution
6 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-05-12T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a low gold grade over a moderate width, contributing to the overall understanding of the Nucleus deposit, but is not new information and is below the cutoff.

Negative factors

  • Historical drill result (2021)
  • Low gold grade
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not account for recovery losses
  • Gold grade is below the 0.5 g/t AuEq cutoff

Evidence · table

“0.36”

Context: 9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

N21-10Nucleus Deposit · silverGrade: 0.87Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
N21-10
Project
Nucleus Deposit
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
TIG

Geometry

Grade
0.87
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9 m
From
4 m
To
13 m
Hole Depth
257.86 m
Intercept Depth
4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
N21-10:4-13

Location

Easting
379525
Northing
6914090
CRS
NAD83-8N
Elevation
906 m
Azimuth
210 °
Dip
-70 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.41
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq
Max Dilution
6 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-05-12T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a very low silver grade over a moderate width, contributing to the overall understanding of the Nucleus deposit, but is not new information.

Negative factors

  • Historical drill result (2021)
  • Very low silver grade
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not account for recovery losses

Evidence · table

“0.87”

Context: 9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

N21-10Nucleus Deposit · copperGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
N21-10
Project
Nucleus Deposit
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
TIG

Geometry

Grade
0.02
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
9 m
From
4 m
To
13 m
Hole Depth
257.86 m
Intercept Depth
4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
N21-10:4-13

Location

Easting
379525
Northing
6914090
CRS
NAD83-8N
Elevation
906 m
Azimuth
210 °
Dip
-70 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.41
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq
Max Dilution
6 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-05-12T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a very low copper grade over a moderate width, contributing to the overall understanding of the Nucleus deposit, but is not new information.

Negative factors

  • Historical drill result (2021)
  • Very low copper grade
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not account for recovery losses

Evidence · table

“0.02”

Context: 9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

N21-10Nucleus Deposit · goldGrade: 0.65Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
N21-10
Project
Nucleus Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
TIG

Geometry

Grade
0.65
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9 m
From
54 m
To
63 m
Hole Depth
257.86 m
Intercept Depth
4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
N21-10:54-63

Location

Easting
379525
Northing
6914090
CRS
NAD83-8N
Elevation
906 m
Azimuth
210 °
Dip
-70 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.71
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq
Max Dilution
6 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-05-12T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a moderate gold grade over a good width, contributing to the overall understanding of the Nucleus deposit, but is not new information.

Positive factors

  • Moderate gold grade over a good width

Negative factors

  • Historical drill result (2021)
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not account for recovery losses

Evidence · table

“0.65”

Context: 9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

N21-10Nucleus Deposit · silverGrade: 0.69Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
N21-10
Project
Nucleus Deposit
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
TIG

Geometry

Grade
0.69
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9 m
From
54 m
To
63 m
Hole Depth
257.86 m
Intercept Depth
4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
N21-10:54-63

Location

Easting
379525
Northing
6914090
CRS
NAD83-8N
Elevation
906 m
Azimuth
210 °
Dip
-70 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.71
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq
Max Dilution
6 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-05-12T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a very low silver grade over a good width, contributing to the overall understanding of the Nucleus deposit, but is not new information.

Negative factors

  • Historical drill result (2021)
  • Very low silver grade
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not account for recovery losses

Evidence · table

“0.69”

Context: 9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

N21-10Nucleus Deposit · copperGrade: 0.03Grade Unit: %Intercept: 9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
N21-10
Project
Nucleus Deposit
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
TIG

Geometry

Grade
0.03
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
9 m
From
54 m
To
63 m
Hole Depth
257.86 m
Intercept Depth
4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
N21-10:54-63

Location

Easting
379525
Northing
6914090
CRS
NAD83-8N
Elevation
906 m
Azimuth
210 °
Dip
-70 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.71
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq
Max Dilution
6 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-05-12T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a very low copper grade over a good width, contributing to the overall understanding of the Nucleus deposit, but is not new information.

Negative factors

  • Historical drill result (2021)
  • Very low copper grade
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not account for recovery losses

Evidence · table

“0.03”

Context: 9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

N21-11Nucleus Deposit · goldGrade: 0.92Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 20 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
N21-11
Project
Nucleus Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
TIG

Geometry

Grade
0.92
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
20 m
From
31.6 m
To
51.6 m
Hole Depth
232.56 m
Intercept Depth
31.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
N21-11:31.6-51.6

Location

Easting
379620
Northing
6914482
CRS
NAD83-8N
Elevation
880 m
Azimuth
340 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.96
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq
Max Dilution
6 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-05-12T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a good gold grade over a good width, contributing to the overall understanding of the Nucleus deposit, but is not new information.

Positive factors

  • Good gold grade over a good width

Negative factors

  • Historical drill result (2021)
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not account for recovery losses

Evidence · table

“0.92”

Context: 20

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

N21-11Nucleus Deposit · silverGrade: 1.46Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 20 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
N21-11
Project
Nucleus Deposit
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
TIG

Geometry

Grade
1.46
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
20 m
From
31.6 m
To
51.6 m
Hole Depth
232.56 m
Intercept Depth
31.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
N21-11:31.6-51.6

Location

Easting
379620
Northing
6914482
CRS
NAD83-8N
Elevation
880 m
Azimuth
340 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.96
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq
Max Dilution
6 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-05-12T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a low silver grade over a good width, contributing to the overall understanding of the Nucleus deposit, but is not new information.

Negative factors

  • Historical drill result (2021)
  • Low silver grade
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not account for recovery losses

Evidence · table

“1.46”

Context: 20

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

N21-11Nucleus Deposit · copperGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 20 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
N21-11
Project
Nucleus Deposit
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
TIG

Geometry

Grade
0.01
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
20 m
From
31.6 m
To
51.6 m
Hole Depth
232.56 m
Intercept Depth
31.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
N21-11:31.6-51.6

Location

Easting
379620
Northing
6914482
CRS
NAD83-8N
Elevation
880 m
Azimuth
340 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.96
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq
Max Dilution
6 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-05-12T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a very low copper grade over a good width, contributing to the overall understanding of the Nucleus deposit, but is not new information.

Negative factors

  • Historical drill result (2021)
  • Very low copper grade
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not account for recovery losses

Evidence · table

“0.01”

Context: 20

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

N21-11Nucleus Deposit · goldGrade: 1.36Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
N21-11
Project
Nucleus Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
TIG

Geometry

Grade
1.36
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.4 m
From
31.6 m
To
41 m
Hole Depth
232.56 m
Intercept Depth
31.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
N21-11:31.6-41

Location

Easting
379620
Northing
6914482
CRS
NAD83-8N
Elevation
880 m
Azimuth
340 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.41
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq
Max Dilution
6 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-05-12T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical sub-interval shows a good gold grade over a good width, highlighting a higher-grade zone within the broader intercept, but is not new information.

Positive factors

  • Good gold grade over a good width (sub-interval)

Negative factors

  • Historical drill result (2021)
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not account for recovery losses

Evidence · table

“1.36”

Context: 9.4

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

N21-11Nucleus Deposit · silverGrade: 2.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
N21-11
Project
Nucleus Deposit
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
TIG

Geometry

Grade
2.25
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.4 m
From
31.6 m
To
41 m
Hole Depth
232.56 m
Intercept Depth
31.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
N21-11:31.6-41

Location

Easting
379620
Northing
6914482
CRS
NAD83-8N
Elevation
880 m
Azimuth
340 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.41
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq
Max Dilution
6 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-05-12T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical sub-interval shows a low silver grade over a good width, contributing to the overall understanding of the Nucleus deposit, but is not new information.

Negative factors

  • Historical drill result (2021)
  • Low silver grade
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not account for recovery losses

Evidence · table

“2.25”

Context: 9.4

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

N21-11Nucleus Deposit · copperGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 9.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
N21-11
Project
Nucleus Deposit
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
TIG

Geometry

Grade
0.01
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
9.4 m
From
31.6 m
To
41 m
Hole Depth
232.56 m
Intercept Depth
31.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
N21-11:31.6-41

Location

Easting
379620
Northing
6914482
CRS
NAD83-8N
Elevation
880 m
Azimuth
340 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.41
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq
Max Dilution
6 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-05-12T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical sub-interval shows a very low copper grade over a good width, contributing to the overall understanding of the Nucleus deposit, but is not new information.

Negative factors

  • Historical drill result (2021)
  • Very low copper grade
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not account for recovery losses

Evidence · table

“0.01”

Context: 9.4

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

N21-11Nucleus Deposit · goldGrade: 0.42Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
N21-11
Project
Nucleus Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
TIG

Geometry

Grade
0.42
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4 m
From
194 m
To
198 m
Hole Depth
232.56 m
Intercept Depth
31.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
N21-11:194-198

Location

Easting
379620
Northing
6914482
CRS
NAD83-8N
Elevation
880 m
Azimuth
340 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.55
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq
Max Dilution
6 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-05-12T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a low gold grade over a narrow width, contributing to the overall understanding of the Nucleus deposit, but is not new information and is below the cutoff.

Negative factors

  • Historical drill result (2021)
  • Low gold grade
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not account for recovery losses
  • Gold grade is below the 0.5 g/t AuEq cutoff

Evidence · table

“0.42”

Context: 4

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

N21-11Nucleus Deposit · silverGrade: 1.05Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
N21-11
Project
Nucleus Deposit
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
TIG

Geometry

Grade
1.05
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4 m
From
194 m
To
198 m
Hole Depth
232.56 m
Intercept Depth
31.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
N21-11:194-198

Location

Easting
379620
Northing
6914482
CRS
NAD83-8N
Elevation
880 m
Azimuth
340 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.55
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq
Max Dilution
6 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-05-12T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a low silver grade over a narrow width, contributing to the overall understanding of the Nucleus deposit, but is not new information.

Negative factors

  • Historical drill result (2021)
  • Low silver grade
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not account for recovery losses

Evidence · table

“1.05”

Context: 4

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

N21-11Nucleus Deposit · copperGrade: 0.07Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
N21-11
Project
Nucleus Deposit
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
TIG

Geometry

Grade
0.07
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4 m
From
194 m
To
198 m
Hole Depth
232.56 m
Intercept Depth
31.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
N21-11:194-198

Location

Easting
379620
Northing
6914482
CRS
NAD83-8N
Elevation
880 m
Azimuth
340 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.55
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq
Max Dilution
6 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-05-12T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a low copper grade over a narrow width, contributing to the overall understanding of the Nucleus deposit, but is not new information.

Negative factors

  • Historical drill result (2021)
  • Low copper grade
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not account for recovery losses

Evidence · table

“0.07”

Context: 4

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

O21-01Nucleus Deposit · goldGrade: 0.47Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
O21-01
Project
Nucleus Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
TIG

Geometry

Grade
0.47
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.8 m
From
94.5 m
To
98.3 m
Hole Depth
242.32 m
Intercept Depth
94.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
O21-01:94.5-98.3

Location

Easting
380343
Northing
6912498
CRS
NAD83-8N
Elevation
812 m
Azimuth
220 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.68
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq
Max Dilution
6 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-05-12T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a low gold grade over a narrow width, contributing to the overall understanding of the Nucleus deposit, but is not new information and is below the cutoff.

Negative factors

  • Historical drill result (2021)
  • Low gold grade
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not account for recovery losses
  • Gold grade is below the 0.5 g/t AuEq cutoff

Evidence · table

“0.47”

Context: 3.8

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

O21-01Nucleus Deposit · silverGrade: 1.22Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
O21-01
Project
Nucleus Deposit
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
TIG

Geometry

Grade
1.22
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.8 m
From
94.5 m
To
98.3 m
Hole Depth
242.32 m
Intercept Depth
94.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
O21-01:94.5-98.3

Location

Easting
380343
Northing
6912498
CRS
NAD83-8N
Elevation
812 m
Azimuth
220 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.68
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq
Max Dilution
6 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-05-12T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a low silver grade over a narrow width, contributing to the overall understanding of the Nucleus deposit, but is not new information.

Negative factors

  • Historical drill result (2021)
  • Low silver grade
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not account for recovery losses

Evidence · table

“1.22”

Context: 3.8

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

O21-01Nucleus Deposit · copperGrade: 0.12Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
O21-01
Project
Nucleus Deposit
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
TIG

Geometry

Grade
0.12
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3.8 m
From
94.5 m
To
98.3 m
Hole Depth
242.32 m
Intercept Depth
94.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
O21-01:94.5-98.3

Location

Easting
380343
Northing
6912498
CRS
NAD83-8N
Elevation
812 m
Azimuth
220 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.68
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq
Max Dilution
6 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-05-12T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a low copper grade over a narrow width, contributing to the overall understanding of the Nucleus deposit, but is not new information.

Negative factors

  • Historical drill result (2021)
  • Low copper grade
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not account for recovery losses

Evidence · table

“0.12”

Context: 3.8

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

O21-01Nucleus Deposit · goldGrade: 0.56Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.43 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
O21-01
Project
Nucleus Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
TIG

Geometry

Grade
0.56
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5.43 m
From
141 m
To
146.4 m
Hole Depth
242.32 m
Intercept Depth
94.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
O21-01:141-146.4

Location

Easting
380343
Northing
6912498
CRS
NAD83-8N
Elevation
812 m
Azimuth
220 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.69
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq
Max Dilution
6 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-05-12T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a moderate gold grade over a moderate width, contributing to the overall understanding of the Nucleus deposit, but is not new information.

Positive factors

  • Moderate gold grade over a moderate width

Negative factors

  • Historical drill result (2021)
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not account for recovery losses

Evidence · table

“0.56”

Context: 5.43

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

O21-01Nucleus Deposit · silverGrade: 0.69Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.43 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
O21-01
Project
Nucleus Deposit
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
TIG

Geometry

Grade
0.69
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5.43 m
From
141 m
To
146.4 m
Hole Depth
242.32 m
Intercept Depth
94.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
O21-01:141-146.4

Location

Easting
380343
Northing
6912498
CRS
NAD83-8N
Elevation
812 m
Azimuth
220 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenic

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.69
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq
Max Dilution
6 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2025-05-12T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical drill intercept shows a very low silver grade over a moderate width, contributing to the overall understanding of the Nucleus deposit, but is not new information.

Negative factors

  • Historical drill result (2021)
  • Very low silver grade
  • Metal equivalent calculation does not account for recovery losses

Evidence · table

“0.69”

Context: 5.43

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

A source-stated penalty, refractory or recovery concern in the fact's scope. Element detection alone, including measured elements explicitly below penalty thresholds, does not trigger this tag. Respect negation and retain a separately stated concern even when another risk is explicitly absent.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

O21-01Nucleus Deposit · copperGrade: 0.08Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.43 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
O21-01
Project
Nucleus Deposit
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_yt
Reported Region
canada_yt
Ticker
TIG

Geometry

Grade
0.08
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
5.43 m
From
141 m
To
146.4 m
Intercept Depth
141 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
O21-01:141-146.4

Location

CRS
NAD83-8N

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2021-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2025-05-12T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.08 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 0.4 %·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.08 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.08”

Context: O21-01

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.