Update on Drilling on Chibougamau's Berrigan Mine Asset

Original announcement by tmx on

Company
Chibougamau Independent Mines Inc.
Ticker
CBG
Exchange
TSX
Region
Québec
Primary commodity
Zinc
Secondary commodities
Gold, Silver, Copper
Document categories
Drill results, Other
Extracted
2026-09-17 14:59:07 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Chibougamau Independent Mines reported significant drill results from the Berrigan Mine project in Quebec, specifically targeting the Berrigan Deep zone. Notable intercepts include 98.5 m at 5.75% ZnEq in hole TOM-25-015, confirming systematic mineralization at depth.

Reasoning: The release reports high-grade ZnEq and AuEq intercepts from new drilling targeting the Berrigan Deep zone, demonstrating significant extension of mineralization at depth.

Positive factors

  • High-grade ZnEq intercepts reported in new lower zone
  • Significant width on TOM-25-015 (98.5 m)
  • Systematic mineralization observed in Berrigan Deep zone
  • QA/QC and QP sign-off disclosed

Negative factors

  • True width is only an estimate (80-85% of core length)

Facts used in scoring: 62

Classification and evidence

Step-Out Extensionpositive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Why it applies: Drilling targeted the Berrigan Deep zone to extend previous Phase 1 drilling.

Evidence · text

“designed to test the core of modelled conductive plates at depth and evaluate the potential of the Berrigan Deep zone”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: Release includes QP sign-off by multiple P.Geo professionals.

Evidence · text

“reviewed and approved by Jean Lafleur, P.Geo., ... and Suzie Tremblay, P.Geo.”

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: True width is estimated as 80-85% of core length rather than explicitly stated.

Evidence · text

“True width is estimated to be approximately 80-85% of the core length”

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 62. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (62)

TOM-25-014Berrigan Mine · zincGrade: 45509Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 2.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-014
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
45509
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
2.1 m
From
185 m
To
187.1 m
Intercept Depth
185 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-014:185-187.1

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
28.69
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: High grade Zn intercept in a short interval.

Evidence · table

“45509”

Context: 2.10

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Previous Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 "

TOM-25-014Berrigan Mine · goldGrade: 4.94Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-014
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
4.94
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.1 m
From
185 m
To
187.1 m
Intercept Depth
185 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-014:185-187.1

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
28.69
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Solid gold grade in intercept.

Evidence · table

“4.94”

Context: 2.10

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Previous Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 "

TOM-25-015Berrigan Mine · zincGrade: 19751Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 98.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-015
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
19751
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
98.5 m
From
451.2 m
To
549.7 m
Intercept Depth
451.2 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-015:451.2-549.7

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Major discovery-style intercept in the new lower zone.

Positive factors

  • Very wide intercept
  • Significant Zn grade

Evidence · table

“19751”

Context: 98.50

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Previous Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 "

TOM-25-015Berrigan Mine · goldGrade: 0.82Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 98.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-015
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
0.82
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
98.5 m
From
451.2 m
To
549.7 m
Intercept Depth
451.2 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-015:451.2-549.7

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Gold grade accompanies a very wide zinc interval.

Evidence · table

“0.82”

Context: 98.50

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Previous Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 "

TOM-25-015Berrigan Mine · zincGrade: 47876Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 4.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-25-015
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
47876
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
4.9 m
From
452.2 m
To
457.1 m
Intercept Depth
452.2 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-25-015:452.2-457.1

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
26.67
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: High grade sub-interval within the wide zone.

Positive factors

  • High grade ZnEq

Evidence · table

“26.67”

Context: 4.90

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Previous Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 "

TOM- 25-014Berrigan Mine · silverGrade: 56.44Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM- 25-014
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
56.44
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.1 m
From
185 m
To
187.1 m
Intercept Depth
185 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM- 25-014:185-187.1

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
28.69
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 56.44 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 118.5 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“56.44”

Context: TOM- 25-014

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Previous Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 "

TOM- 25-014Berrigan Mine · copperGrade: 545Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 2.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM- 25-014
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
545
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
2.1 m
From
185 m
To
187.1 m
Intercept Depth
185 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM- 25-014:185-187.1

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
28.69
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 545 ppm copper, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the copper rubric unit %; not scored.

Evidence · table

“545”

Context: TOM- 25-014

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Previous Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 "

TOM-025-14Berrigan Mine · goldGrade: 2.63Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.15 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-025-14
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
2.63
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.15 m
From
238.7 m
To
239.85 m
Intercept Depth
238.7 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-025-14:238.7-239.85

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
23.29
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.63 g/t gold is strong against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 3.0 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 2.63 g/t gold is strong on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“2.63”

Context: Table 1: Results from drill holes TOM-02

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Previous Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 "

TOM-025-14Berrigan Mine · silverGrade: 22.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.15 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-025-14
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
22.2
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.15 m
From
238.7 m
To
239.85 m
Intercept Depth
238.7 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-025-14:238.7-239.85

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
23.29
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 22.2 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 25.5 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 22.2 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“22.20”

Context: Table 1: Results from drill holes TOM-02

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Previous Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 "

TOM-025-14Berrigan Mine · copperGrade: 1590Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.15 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-025-14
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
1590
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.15 m
From
238.7 m
To
239.85 m
Intercept Depth
238.7 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-025-14:238.7-239.85

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
23.29
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 1590 ppm copper, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the copper rubric unit %; not scored.

Evidence · table

“1590”

Context: Table 1: Results from drill holes TOM-02

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Previous Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 "

TOM-025-14Berrigan Mine · zincGrade: 104000Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.15 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-025-14
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
104000
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.15 m
From
238.7 m
To
239.85 m
Intercept Depth
238.7 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-025-14:238.7-239.85

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
23.29
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 104000 ppm zinc, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the zinc rubric unit %; not scored.

Evidence · table

“104000”

Context: Table 1: Results from drill holes TOM-02

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Previous Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 "

TOM-025-14Berrigan Mine · goldGrade: 7.44Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-025-14
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
7.44
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.4 m
From
251.2 m
To
252.6 m
Intercept Depth
251.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-025-14:251.2-252.6

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
41.79
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7.44 g/t gold is exceptional against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 10.4 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 7.44 g/t gold is exceptional on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“7.44”

Context: Table 1: Results from drill holes TOM-02

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Previous Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 "

TOM-025-14Berrigan Mine · silverGrade: 37.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-025-14
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
37.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.4 m
From
251.2 m
To
252.6 m
Intercept Depth
251.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-025-14:251.2-252.6

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
41.79
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 37.3 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 52.2 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“37.30”

Context: Table 1: Results from drill holes TOM-02

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Previous Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 "

TOM-025-14Berrigan Mine · copperGrade: 552Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-025-14
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
552
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.4 m
From
251.2 m
To
252.6 m
Intercept Depth
251.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-025-14:251.2-252.6

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
41.79
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 552 ppm copper, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the copper rubric unit %; not scored.

Evidence · table

“552”

Context: Table 1: Results from drill holes TOM-02

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Previous Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 "

TOM-025-14Berrigan Mine · zincGrade: 80400Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-025-14
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
80400
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.4 m
From
251.2 m
To
252.6 m
Intercept Depth
251.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-025-14:251.2-252.6

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
41.79
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 80400 ppm zinc, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the zinc rubric unit %; not scored.

Evidence · table

“80400”

Context: Table 1: Results from drill holes TOM-02

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Previous Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 "

TOM-025-14Berrigan Mine · goldGrade: 1.13Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-025-14
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
1.13
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.4 m
From
405.3 m
To
406.7 m
Intercept Depth
405.3 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-025-14:405.3-406.7

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
14.99
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.13 g/t gold is moderate against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 1.6 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.13”

Context: Table 1: Results from drill holes TOM-02

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Previous Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 "

TOM-025-14Berrigan Mine · silverGrade: 13.15Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-025-14
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
13.15
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.4 m
From
405.3 m
To
406.7 m
Intercept Depth
405.3 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-025-14:405.3-406.7

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
14.99
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 13.15 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 18.4 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 13.15 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“13.15”

Context: Table 1: Results from drill holes TOM-02

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Previous Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 "

TOM-025-14Berrigan Mine · copperGrade: 655Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-025-14
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
655
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.4 m
From
405.3 m
To
406.7 m
Intercept Depth
405.3 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-025-14:405.3-406.7

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
14.99
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 655 ppm copper, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the copper rubric unit %; not scored.

Evidence · table

“655”

Context: Table 1: Results from drill holes TOM-02

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Previous Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 "

TOM-025-14Berrigan Mine · zincGrade: 92514Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-025-14
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
92514
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
1.4 m
From
405.3 m
To
406.7 m
Intercept Depth
405.3 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-025-14:405.3-406.7

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
14.99
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 92514 ppm zinc, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the zinc rubric unit %; not scored.

Evidence · table

“92514”

Context: Table 1: Results from drill holes TOM-02

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Previous Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 "

TOM-025-14Berrigan Mine · goldGrade: 0.07Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-025-14
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
0.07
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m
From
423.3 m
To
426.3 m
Intercept Depth
423.3 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-025-14:423.3-426.3

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.34
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.07 g/t gold is below against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.2 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.07 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.07”

Context: Table 1: Results from drill holes TOM-02

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Previous Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 "

TOM-025-14Berrigan Mine · silverGrade: 5.45Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-025-14
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
5.45
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m
From
423.3 m
To
426.3 m
Intercept Depth
423.3 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-025-14:423.3-426.3

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.34
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.45 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 16.4 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 5.45 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“5.45”

Context: Table 1: Results from drill holes TOM-02

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Previous Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 "

TOM-025-14Berrigan Mine · copperGrade: 493Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-025-14
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
493
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
3 m
From
423.3 m
To
426.3 m
Intercept Depth
423.3 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-025-14:423.3-426.3

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.34
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 493 ppm copper, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the copper rubric unit %; not scored.

Evidence · table

“493”

Context: Table 1: Results from drill holes TOM-02

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Previous Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 "

TOM-025-14Berrigan Mine · zincGrade: 15700Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-025-14
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
15700
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
3 m
From
423.3 m
To
426.3 m
Intercept Depth
423.3 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-025-14:423.3-426.3

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.34
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 15700 ppm zinc, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the zinc rubric unit %; not scored.

Evidence · table

“15700”

Context: Table 1: Results from drill holes TOM-02

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Previous Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 "

TOM-025-14Berrigan Mine · goldGrade: 0.08Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-025-14
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
0.08
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6 m
From
451.5 m
To
457.5 m
Intercept Depth
451.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-025-14:451.5-457.5

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.34
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.08 g/t gold is below against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.5 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 0.08 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.08”

Context: Table 1: Results from drill holes TOM-02

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Previous Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 "

TOM-025-14Berrigan Mine · silverGrade: 3.45Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-025-14
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
3.45
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6 m
From
451.5 m
To
457.5 m
Intercept Depth
451.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-025-14:451.5-457.5

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.34
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.45 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 20.7 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 3.45 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“3.45”

Context: Table 1: Results from drill holes TOM-02

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Previous Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 "

TOM-025-14Berrigan Mine · copperGrade: 77Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-025-14
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
77
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
6 m
From
451.5 m
To
457.5 m
Intercept Depth
451.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-025-14:451.5-457.5

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.34
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 77 ppm copper, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the copper rubric unit %; not scored.

Evidence · table

“77”

Context: Table 1: Results from drill holes TOM-02

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Previous Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 "

TOM-025-14Berrigan Mine · zincGrade: 7882Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-025-14
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
7882
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
6 m
From
451.5 m
To
457.5 m
Intercept Depth
451.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-025-14:451.5-457.5

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.34
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 7882 ppm zinc, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the zinc rubric unit %; not scored.

Evidence · table

“7882”

Context: Table 1: Results from drill holes TOM-02

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Previous Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 "

TOM- 25-015Berrigan Mine · goldGrade: 0.51Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8.45 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM- 25-015
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
0.51
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
8.45 m
From
132.55 m
To
141 m
Intercept Depth
132.55 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM- 25-015:132.55-141

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
4.22
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.51 g/t gold is weak against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 4.3 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.51”

Context: TOM- 25-015

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Previous Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 "

TOM- 25-015Berrigan Mine · silverGrade: 5.51Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8.45 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM- 25-015
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
5.51
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
8.45 m
From
132.55 m
To
141 m
Intercept Depth
132.55 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM- 25-015:132.55-141

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
4.22
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.51 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 46.6 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 5.51 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“5.51”

Context: TOM- 25-015

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Previous Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 "

TOM- 25-015Berrigan Mine · copperGrade: 338Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 8.45 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM- 25-015
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
338
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
8.45 m
From
132.55 m
To
141 m
Intercept Depth
132.55 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM- 25-015:132.55-141

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
4.22
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 338 ppm copper, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the copper rubric unit %; not scored.

Evidence · table

“338”

Context: TOM- 25-015

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Previous Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 "

TOM- 25-015Berrigan Mine · zincGrade: 16610Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 8.45 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM- 25-015
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
16610
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
8.45 m
From
132.55 m
To
141 m
Intercept Depth
132.55 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM- 25-015:132.55-141

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
4.22
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 16610 ppm zinc, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the zinc rubric unit %; not scored.

Evidence · table

“16610”

Context: TOM- 25-015

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Previous Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 "

TOM-025-14Berrigan Mine · goldGrade: 4.66Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-025-14
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
4.66
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2 m
From
155.7 m
To
157.7 m
Intercept Depth
155.7 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-025-14:155.7-157.7

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
31.75
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.66 g/t gold is strong against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 9.3 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 4.66 g/t gold is strong on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“4.66”

Context: Table 1: Results from drill holes TOM-02

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Previous Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 "

TOM-025-14Berrigan Mine · silverGrade: 26.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-025-14
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
26.9
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2 m
From
155.7 m
To
157.7 m
Intercept Depth
155.7 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-025-14:155.7-157.7

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
31.75
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 26.9 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 53.8 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 26.9 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“26.90”

Context: Table 1: Results from drill holes TOM-02

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Previous Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 "

TOM-025-14Berrigan Mine · copperGrade: 684Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-025-14
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
684
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
2 m
From
155.7 m
To
157.7 m
Intercept Depth
155.7 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-025-14:155.7-157.7

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
31.75
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 684 ppm copper, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the copper rubric unit %; not scored.

Evidence · table

“684”

Context: Table 1: Results from drill holes TOM-02

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Previous Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 "

TOM-025-14Berrigan Mine · zincGrade: 102850Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-025-14
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
102850
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
2 m
From
155.7 m
To
157.7 m
Intercept Depth
155.7 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-025-14:155.7-157.7

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
31.75
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 102850 ppm zinc, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the zinc rubric unit %; not scored.

Evidence · table

“102850”

Context: Table 1: Results from drill holes TOM-02

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Previous Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 "

TOM-025-14Berrigan Mine · goldGrade: 0.36Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 20.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-025-14
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
0.36
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
20.1 m
From
182.1 m
To
202.2 m
Intercept Depth
182.1 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-025-14:182.1-202.2

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.55
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.36 g/t gold is weak against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 7.2 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.36”

Context: Table 1: Results from drill holes TOM-02

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Previous Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 "

TOM-025-14Berrigan Mine · silverGrade: 3.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 20.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-025-14
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
3.2
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
20.1 m
From
182.1 m
To
202.2 m
Intercept Depth
182.1 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-025-14:182.1-202.2

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.55
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.2 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 64.3 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 3.2 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“3.20”

Context: Table 1: Results from drill holes TOM-02

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Previous Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 "

TOM-025-14Berrigan Mine · copperGrade: 265Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 20.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-025-14
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
265
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
20.1 m
From
182.1 m
To
202.2 m
Intercept Depth
182.1 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-025-14:182.1-202.2

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.55
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 265 ppm copper, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the copper rubric unit %; not scored.

Evidence · table

“265”

Context: Table 1: Results from drill holes TOM-02

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Previous Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 "

TOM-025-14Berrigan Mine · zincGrade: 7687Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 20.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-025-14
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
7687
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
20.1 m
From
182.1 m
To
202.2 m
Intercept Depth
182.1 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-025-14:182.1-202.2

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
2.55
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 7687 ppm zinc, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the zinc rubric unit %; not scored.

Evidence · table

“7687”

Context: Table 1: Results from drill holes TOM-02

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Previous Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 "

TOM-025-14Berrigan Mine · goldGrade: 0.82Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 98.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-025-14
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
0.82
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
98.5 m
From
451.2 m
To
549.7 m
Intercept Depth
451.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-025-14:451.2-549.7

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
5.75
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.82 g/t gold is moderate against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 80.8 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.82”

Context: Table 1: Results from drill holes TOM-02

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Previous Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 "

TOM-025-14Berrigan Mine · silverGrade: 3.21Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 98.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-025-14
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
3.21
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
98.5 m
From
451.2 m
To
549.7 m
Intercept Depth
451.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-025-14:451.2-549.7

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
5.75
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.21 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 316.2 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“3.21”

Context: Table 1: Results from drill holes TOM-02

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Previous Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 "

TOM-025-14Berrigan Mine · copperGrade: 386Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 98.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-025-14
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
386
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
98.5 m
From
451.2 m
To
549.7 m
Intercept Depth
451.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-025-14:451.2-549.7

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
5.75
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 386 ppm copper, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the copper rubric unit %; not scored.

Evidence · table

“386”

Context: Table 1: Results from drill holes TOM-02

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Previous Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 "

TOM-025-14Berrigan Mine · zincGrade: 19751Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 98.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM-025-14
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
19751
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
98.5 m
From
451.2 m
To
549.7 m
Intercept Depth
451.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM-025-14:451.2-549.7

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
5.75
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 19751 ppm zinc, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the zinc rubric unit %; not scored.

Evidence · table

“19751”

Context: Table 1: Results from drill holes TOM-02

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Previous Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 "

TOM- 25-015Berrigan Mine · goldGrade: 4.69Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM- 25-015
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
4.69
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.9 m
From
452.2 m
To
457.1 m
Intercept Depth
452.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM- 25-015:452.2-457.1

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
26.67
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.69 g/t gold is strong against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 23.0 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 4.69 g/t gold is strong on the default band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“4.69”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Previous Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 "

TOM- 25-015Berrigan Mine · silverGrade: 18.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM- 25-015
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
18.8
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.9 m
From
452.2 m
To
457.1 m
Intercept Depth
452.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM- 25-015:452.2-457.1

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
26.67
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 18.8 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 92.1 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 18.8 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“18.80”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Previous Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 "

TOM- 25-015Berrigan Mine · copperGrade: 2897Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 4.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TOM- 25-015
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
2897
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
4.9 m
From
452.2 m
To
457.1 m
Intercept Depth
452.2 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TOM- 25-015:452.2-457.1

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
26.67
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 2897 ppm copper, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the copper rubric unit %; not scored.

Evidence · table

“2897”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Previous Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 "

andBerrigan Mine · goldGrade: 0.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 49.35 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
0.9
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
49.35 m
From
500.35 m
To
549.7 m
Intercept Depth
500.35 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:500.35-549.7

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
7.26
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.9 g/t gold is moderate against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 44.4 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.90”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Previous Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 "

andBerrigan Mine · silverGrade: 3.48Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 49.35 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
3.48
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
49.35 m
From
500.35 m
To
549.7 m
Intercept Depth
500.35 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:500.35-549.7

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
7.26
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.48 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 171.7 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 3.48 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“3.48”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Previous Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 "

andBerrigan Mine · copperGrade: 310Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 49.35 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
310
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
49.35 m
From
500.35 m
To
549.7 m
Intercept Depth
500.35 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:500.35-549.7

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
7.26
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 310 ppm copper, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the copper rubric unit %; not scored.

Evidence · table

“310”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Previous Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 "

andBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 31250Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 49.35 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
31250
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
49.35 m
From
500.35 m
To
549.7 m
Intercept Depth
500.35 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:500.35-549.7

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
7.26
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 31250 ppm zinc, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the zinc rubric unit %; not scored.

Evidence · table

“31250”

Context: including

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Previous Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 "

andBerrigan Mine · goldGrade: 1.34Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 14.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
1.34
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
14.6 m
From
521 m
To
535.6 m
Intercept Depth
521 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:521-535.6

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
10.26
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.34 g/t gold is moderate against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 19.6 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.34”

Context: Including

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Previous Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 "

andBerrigan Mine · silverGrade: 5.91Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 14.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
5.91
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
14.6 m
From
521 m
To
535.6 m
Intercept Depth
521 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:521-535.6

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
10.26
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.91 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 86.3 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 5.91 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“5.91”

Context: Including

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Previous Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 "

andBerrigan Mine · copperGrade: 420Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 14.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
420
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
14.6 m
From
521 m
To
535.6 m
Intercept Depth
521 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:521-535.6

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
10.26
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 420 ppm copper, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the copper rubric unit %; not scored.

Evidence · table

“420”

Context: Including

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Previous Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 "

andBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 41158Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 14.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
41158
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
14.6 m
From
521 m
To
535.6 m
Intercept Depth
521 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:521-535.6

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
10.26
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 41158 ppm zinc, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the zinc rubric unit %; not scored.

Evidence · table

“41158”

Context: Including

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Previous Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 "

andBerrigan Mine · goldGrade: 0.88Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.25 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
0.88
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.25 m
From
537.85 m
To
541.1 m
Intercept Depth
537.85 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:537.85-541.1

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
9.94
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.88 g/t gold is weak against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 2.9 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.88”

Context: Including

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Previous Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 "

andBerrigan Mine · silverGrade: 3.85Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.25 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
3.85
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.25 m
From
537.85 m
To
541.1 m
Intercept Depth
537.85 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:537.85-541.1

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
9.94
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.85 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 12.5 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 3.85 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“3.85”

Context: Including

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Previous Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 "

andBerrigan Mine · copperGrade: 529Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3.25 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
529
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
3.25 m
From
537.85 m
To
541.1 m
Intercept Depth
537.85 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:537.85-541.1

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
9.94
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 529 ppm copper, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the copper rubric unit %; not scored.

Evidence · table

“529”

Context: Including

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Previous Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 "

andBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 58200Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3.25 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
58200
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
3.25 m
From
537.85 m
To
541.1 m
Intercept Depth
537.85 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:537.85-541.1

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
9.94
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 58200 ppm zinc, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the zinc rubric unit %; not scored.

Evidence · table

“58200”

Context: Including

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Previous Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 "

andBerrigan Mine · goldGrade: 1.63Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
1.63
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.2 m
From
542 m
To
548.2 m
Intercept Depth
542 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:542-548.2

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
14.82
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.63 g/t gold is moderate against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 10.1 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.63”

Context: Including

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Previous Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 "

andBerrigan Mine · silverGrade: 5.26Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
5.26
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.2 m
From
542 m
To
548.2 m
Intercept Depth
542 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:542-548.2

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
14.82
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.26 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 32.6 g/t·m is below.

Negative factors

  • 5.26 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“5.26”

Context: Including

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Previous Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 "

andBerrigan Mine · copperGrade: 511Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 6.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
copper
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
511
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
6.2 m
From
542 m
To
548.2 m
Intercept Depth
542 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:542-548.2

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
14.82
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 511 ppm copper, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the copper rubric unit %; not scored.

Evidence · table

“511”

Context: Including

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Previous Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 "

andBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 74276Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 6.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and
Project
Berrigan Mine
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_qc
Reported Region
canada_qc
Ticker
CBG

Geometry

Grade
74276
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
6.2 m
From
542 m
To
548.2 m
Intercept Depth
542 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and:542-548.2

Location

Location
Lower Zone
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
14.82
Metal Eq. Unit
% Eq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 74276 ppm zinc, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).

Negative factors

  • Grade unit ppm does not match the zinc rubric unit %; not scored.

Evidence · table

“74276”

Context: Including

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Previous Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 "

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.