Update on Drilling on Globex's Berrigan Mine Royalty Asset
Original announcement by tmx on
- Company
- GLOBEX MINING ENTERPRISES INC.
- Ticker
- GMX
- Exchange
- TSX
- Region
- Quebec
- Primary commodity
- Zinc
- Secondary commodities
- Gold, Silver, Copper
- Document categories
- Drill results
- Extracted
- 2026-09-16 02:44:57 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Globex reports recent drilling results from the Berrigan Mine royalty asset in Quebec, conducted by TomaGold. The drilling intersected high-grade zinc-equivalent zones, including a 24.85% ZnEq intercept in hole TOM-25-015, demonstrating extension of mineralization at depth.
Reasoning: Drilling intersected high-grade ZnEq zones in the Berrigan Deep zone, extending known mineralization at depth.
Positive factors
- High-grade ZnEq intercepts
- Extension of mineralization at depth
- Systematic mineralization observed
Negative factors
- True width is only estimated (80-85% of core length)
Facts used in scoring: 62
Classification and evidence
Step-Out Extensionpositive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Why it applies: Drilling intersected the new lower zone, extending mineralization at depth.
Evidence · text
“intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 and Tom-25-014 intersected 5.08 ZnEq”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release mentions Qualified Persons (QP) and specific metallurgical report basis.
Evidence · text
“Jack Stoch, P.Geo., in his capacity as a Qualified Person (Q.P.) under Ni 43-101”
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: The document explicitly states that true width is estimated to be 80-85% of core length.
Evidence · text
“True width is estimated to be approximately 80-85% of the core length”
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 62. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (62)
TOM-25-014Berrigan Mine · zincGrade: 28.69Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TOM-25-014
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- GMX
Geometry
- Grade
- 28.69
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.1 m
- From
- 185 m
- To
- 187.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 185 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TOM-25-014:185-187.1
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 28.69
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Strong ZnEq intercept of 28.69% over 2.1m.
Positive factors
- High grade ZnEq
Evidence · table
“28.69”
Context: 2.10
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 and Tom-2"
TOM-25-014Berrigan Mine · goldGrade: 4.94Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TOM-25-014
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- GMX
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.94
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.1 m
- From
- 185 m
- To
- 187.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 185 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TOM-25-014:185-187.1
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 28.69
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Solid gold grade of 4.94 g/t in a zinc-rich intercept.
Positive factors
- Good gold grade
Evidence · table
“4.94”
Context: 2.10
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 and Tom-2"
TOM-25-015Berrigan Mine · zincGrade: 5.75Grade Unit: %Intercept: 98.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TOM-25-015
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- GMX
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.75
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 98.5 m
- From
- 451.2 m
- To
- 549.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 451.2 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TOM-25-015:451.2-549.7
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Large intercept of 98.5m at 5.75% ZnEq.
Positive factors
- Significant width
- High ZnEq
Evidence · table
“5.75”
Context: 98.50
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 and Tom-2"
TOM-25-015Berrigan Mine · goldGrade: 0.82Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 98.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TOM-25-015
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- GMX
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.82
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 98.5 m
- From
- 451.2 m
- To
- 549.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 451.2 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TOM-25-015:451.2-549.7
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Gold grade of 0.82 g/t over a very wide interval.
Evidence · table
“0.82”
Context: 98.50
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 and Tom-2"
TOM-25-015Berrigan Mine · zincGrade: 26.67Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TOM-25-015
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- GMX
Geometry
- Grade
- 26.67
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4.9 m
- From
- 452.2 m
- To
- 457.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 452.2 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TOM-25-015:452.2-457.1
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 26.67
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Very high grade ZnEq intercept of 26.67% over 4.9m.
Positive factors
- Bonanza grade ZnEq
Evidence · table
“26.67”
Context: 4.90
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 and Tom-2"
TOM- 25-014Berrigan Mine · silverGrade: 56.44Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TOM- 25-014
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- GMX
Geometry
- Grade
- 56.44
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.1 m
- From
- 185 m
- To
- 187.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 185 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TOM- 25-014:185-187.1
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 28.69
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 56.44 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 118.5 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“56.44”
Context: TOM- 25-014
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 and Tom-2"
TOM- 25-014Berrigan Mine · copperGrade: 545Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 2.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TOM- 25-014
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- GMX
Geometry
- Grade
- 545
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 2.1 m
- From
- 185 m
- To
- 187.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 185 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TOM- 25-014:185-187.1
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 28.69
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 545 ppm copper, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the copper rubric unit %; not scored.
Evidence · table
“545”
Context: TOM- 25-014
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 and Tom-2"
TOM-025-14Berrigan Mine · goldGrade: 2.63Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TOM-025-14
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- GMX
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.63
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.15 m
- From
- 238.7 m
- To
- 239.85 m
- Intercept Depth
- 238.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TOM-025-14:238.7-239.85
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 23.29
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.63 g/t gold is strong against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 3.0 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 2.63 g/t gold is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.63”
Context: Table 1: Results from drill holes TOM-02
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 and Tom-2"
TOM-025-14Berrigan Mine · silverGrade: 22.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TOM-025-14
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- GMX
Geometry
- Grade
- 22.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.15 m
- From
- 238.7 m
- To
- 239.85 m
- Intercept Depth
- 238.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TOM-025-14:238.7-239.85
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 23.29
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 22.2 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 25.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 22.2 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“22.20”
Context: Table 1: Results from drill holes TOM-02
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 and Tom-2"
TOM-025-14Berrigan Mine · copperGrade: 1590Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TOM-025-14
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- GMX
Geometry
- Grade
- 1590
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.15 m
- From
- 238.7 m
- To
- 239.85 m
- Intercept Depth
- 238.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TOM-025-14:238.7-239.85
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 23.29
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 1590 ppm copper, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the copper rubric unit %; not scored.
Evidence · table
“1590”
Context: Table 1: Results from drill holes TOM-02
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 and Tom-2"
TOM-025-14Berrigan Mine · zincGrade: 104000Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TOM-025-14
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- GMX
Geometry
- Grade
- 104000
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.15 m
- From
- 238.7 m
- To
- 239.85 m
- Intercept Depth
- 238.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TOM-025-14:238.7-239.85
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 23.29
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 104000 ppm zinc, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the zinc rubric unit %; not scored.
Evidence · table
“104000”
Context: Table 1: Results from drill holes TOM-02
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 and Tom-2"
TOM-025-14Berrigan Mine · goldGrade: 7.44Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TOM-025-14
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- GMX
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.44
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.4 m
- From
- 251.2 m
- To
- 252.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 251.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TOM-025-14:251.2-252.6
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 41.79
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7.44 g/t gold is exceptional against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 10.4 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 7.44 g/t gold is exceptional on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“7.44”
Context: Table 1: Results from drill holes TOM-02
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 and Tom-2"
TOM-025-14Berrigan Mine · silverGrade: 37.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TOM-025-14
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- GMX
Geometry
- Grade
- 37.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.4 m
- From
- 251.2 m
- To
- 252.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 251.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TOM-025-14:251.2-252.6
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 41.79
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 37.3 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 52.2 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“37.30”
Context: Table 1: Results from drill holes TOM-02
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 and Tom-2"
TOM-025-14Berrigan Mine · copperGrade: 552Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TOM-025-14
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- GMX
Geometry
- Grade
- 552
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.4 m
- From
- 251.2 m
- To
- 252.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 251.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TOM-025-14:251.2-252.6
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 41.79
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 552 ppm copper, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the copper rubric unit %; not scored.
Evidence · table
“552”
Context: Table 1: Results from drill holes TOM-02
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 and Tom-2"
TOM-025-14Berrigan Mine · zincGrade: 80400Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TOM-025-14
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- GMX
Geometry
- Grade
- 80400
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.4 m
- From
- 251.2 m
- To
- 252.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 251.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TOM-025-14:251.2-252.6
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 41.79
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 80400 ppm zinc, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the zinc rubric unit %; not scored.
Evidence · table
“80400”
Context: Table 1: Results from drill holes TOM-02
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 and Tom-2"
TOM-025-14Berrigan Mine · goldGrade: 1.13Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TOM-025-14
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- GMX
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.13
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.4 m
- From
- 405.3 m
- To
- 406.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 405.3 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TOM-025-14:405.3-406.7
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 14.99
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.13 g/t gold is moderate against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 1.6 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.13”
Context: Table 1: Results from drill holes TOM-02
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 and Tom-2"
TOM-025-14Berrigan Mine · silverGrade: 13.15Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TOM-025-14
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- GMX
Geometry
- Grade
- 13.15
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.4 m
- From
- 405.3 m
- To
- 406.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 405.3 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TOM-025-14:405.3-406.7
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 14.99
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 13.15 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 18.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 13.15 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“13.15”
Context: Table 1: Results from drill holes TOM-02
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 and Tom-2"
TOM-025-14Berrigan Mine · copperGrade: 655Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TOM-025-14
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- GMX
Geometry
- Grade
- 655
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.4 m
- From
- 405.3 m
- To
- 406.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 405.3 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TOM-025-14:405.3-406.7
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 14.99
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 655 ppm copper, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the copper rubric unit %; not scored.
Evidence · table
“655”
Context: Table 1: Results from drill holes TOM-02
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 and Tom-2"
TOM-025-14Berrigan Mine · zincGrade: 92514Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TOM-025-14
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- GMX
Geometry
- Grade
- 92514
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.4 m
- From
- 405.3 m
- To
- 406.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 405.3 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TOM-025-14:405.3-406.7
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 14.99
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 92514 ppm zinc, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the zinc rubric unit %; not scored.
Evidence · table
“92514”
Context: Table 1: Results from drill holes TOM-02
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 and Tom-2"
TOM-025-14Berrigan Mine · goldGrade: 0.07Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TOM-025-14
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- GMX
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.07
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 423.3 m
- To
- 426.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 423.3 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TOM-025-14:423.3-426.3
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.34
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.07 g/t gold is below against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.07 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.07”
Context: Table 1: Results from drill holes TOM-02
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 and Tom-2"
TOM-025-14Berrigan Mine · silverGrade: 5.45Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TOM-025-14
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- GMX
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.45
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 423.3 m
- To
- 426.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 423.3 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TOM-025-14:423.3-426.3
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.34
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.45 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 16.4 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 5.45 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.45”
Context: Table 1: Results from drill holes TOM-02
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 and Tom-2"
TOM-025-14Berrigan Mine · copperGrade: 493Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TOM-025-14
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- GMX
Geometry
- Grade
- 493
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 423.3 m
- To
- 426.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 423.3 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TOM-025-14:423.3-426.3
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.34
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 493 ppm copper, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the copper rubric unit %; not scored.
Evidence · table
“493”
Context: Table 1: Results from drill holes TOM-02
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 and Tom-2"
TOM-025-14Berrigan Mine · zincGrade: 15700Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TOM-025-14
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- GMX
Geometry
- Grade
- 15700
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 423.3 m
- To
- 426.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 423.3 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TOM-025-14:423.3-426.3
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.34
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 15700 ppm zinc, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the zinc rubric unit %; not scored.
Evidence · table
“15700”
Context: Table 1: Results from drill holes TOM-02
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 and Tom-2"
TOM-025-14Berrigan Mine · goldGrade: 0.08Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TOM-025-14
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- GMX
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.08
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 451.5 m
- To
- 457.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 451.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TOM-025-14:451.5-457.5
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.34
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.08 g/t gold is below against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 0.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.08 g/t gold is below the weak threshold (0.3 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.08”
Context: Table 1: Results from drill holes TOM-02
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 and Tom-2"
TOM-025-14Berrigan Mine · silverGrade: 3.45Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TOM-025-14
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- GMX
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.45
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 451.5 m
- To
- 457.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 451.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TOM-025-14:451.5-457.5
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.34
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.45 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 20.7 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 3.45 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.45”
Context: Table 1: Results from drill holes TOM-02
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 and Tom-2"
TOM-025-14Berrigan Mine · copperGrade: 77Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TOM-025-14
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- GMX
Geometry
- Grade
- 77
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 451.5 m
- To
- 457.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 451.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TOM-025-14:451.5-457.5
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.34
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 77 ppm copper, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the copper rubric unit %; not scored.
Evidence · table
“77”
Context: Table 1: Results from drill holes TOM-02
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 and Tom-2"
TOM-025-14Berrigan Mine · zincGrade: 7882Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TOM-025-14
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- GMX
Geometry
- Grade
- 7882
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 451.5 m
- To
- 457.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 451.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TOM-025-14:451.5-457.5
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.34
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 7882 ppm zinc, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the zinc rubric unit %; not scored.
Evidence · table
“7882”
Context: Table 1: Results from drill holes TOM-02
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 and Tom-2"
TOM- 25-015Berrigan Mine · goldGrade: 0.51Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8.45 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TOM- 25-015
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- GMX
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.51
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 8.45 m
- From
- 132.55 m
- To
- 141 m
- Intercept Depth
- 132.55 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TOM- 25-015:132.55-141
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.22
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.51 g/t gold is weak against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 4.3 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.51”
Context: TOM- 25-015
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 and Tom-2"
TOM- 25-015Berrigan Mine · silverGrade: 5.51Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8.45 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TOM- 25-015
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- GMX
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.51
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 8.45 m
- From
- 132.55 m
- To
- 141 m
- Intercept Depth
- 132.55 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TOM- 25-015:132.55-141
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.22
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.51 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 46.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 5.51 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.51”
Context: TOM- 25-015
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 and Tom-2"
TOM- 25-015Berrigan Mine · copperGrade: 338Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 8.45 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TOM- 25-015
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- GMX
Geometry
- Grade
- 338
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 8.45 m
- From
- 132.55 m
- To
- 141 m
- Intercept Depth
- 132.55 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TOM- 25-015:132.55-141
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.22
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 338 ppm copper, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the copper rubric unit %; not scored.
Evidence · table
“338”
Context: TOM- 25-015
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 and Tom-2"
TOM- 25-015Berrigan Mine · zincGrade: 16610Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 8.45 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TOM- 25-015
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- GMX
Geometry
- Grade
- 16610
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 8.45 m
- From
- 132.55 m
- To
- 141 m
- Intercept Depth
- 132.55 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TOM- 25-015:132.55-141
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.22
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 16610 ppm zinc, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the zinc rubric unit %; not scored.
Evidence · table
“16610”
Context: TOM- 25-015
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 and Tom-2"
TOM-025-14Berrigan Mine · goldGrade: 4.66Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TOM-025-14
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- GMX
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.66
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 155.7 m
- To
- 157.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 155.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TOM-025-14:155.7-157.7
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 31.75
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.66 g/t gold is strong against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 9.3 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 4.66 g/t gold is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.66”
Context: Table 1: Results from drill holes TOM-02
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 and Tom-2"
TOM-025-14Berrigan Mine · silverGrade: 26.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TOM-025-14
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- GMX
Geometry
- Grade
- 26.9
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 155.7 m
- To
- 157.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 155.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TOM-025-14:155.7-157.7
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 31.75
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 26.9 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 53.8 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 26.9 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“26.90”
Context: Table 1: Results from drill holes TOM-02
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 and Tom-2"
TOM-025-14Berrigan Mine · copperGrade: 684Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TOM-025-14
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- GMX
Geometry
- Grade
- 684
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 155.7 m
- To
- 157.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 155.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TOM-025-14:155.7-157.7
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 31.75
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 684 ppm copper, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the copper rubric unit %; not scored.
Evidence · table
“684”
Context: Table 1: Results from drill holes TOM-02
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 and Tom-2"
TOM-025-14Berrigan Mine · zincGrade: 102850Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TOM-025-14
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- GMX
Geometry
- Grade
- 102850
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 155.7 m
- To
- 157.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 155.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TOM-025-14:155.7-157.7
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 31.75
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 102850 ppm zinc, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the zinc rubric unit %; not scored.
Evidence · table
“102850”
Context: Table 1: Results from drill holes TOM-02
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 and Tom-2"
TOM-025-14Berrigan Mine · goldGrade: 0.36Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 20.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TOM-025-14
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- GMX
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.36
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 20.1 m
- From
- 182.1 m
- To
- 202.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 182.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TOM-025-14:182.1-202.2
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.55
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.36 g/t gold is weak against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 7.2 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.36”
Context: Table 1: Results from drill holes TOM-02
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 and Tom-2"
TOM-025-14Berrigan Mine · silverGrade: 3.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 20.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TOM-025-14
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- GMX
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 20.1 m
- From
- 182.1 m
- To
- 202.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 182.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TOM-025-14:182.1-202.2
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.55
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.2 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 64.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 3.2 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.20”
Context: Table 1: Results from drill holes TOM-02
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 and Tom-2"
TOM-025-14Berrigan Mine · copperGrade: 265Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 20.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TOM-025-14
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- GMX
Geometry
- Grade
- 265
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 20.1 m
- From
- 182.1 m
- To
- 202.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 182.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TOM-025-14:182.1-202.2
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.55
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 265 ppm copper, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the copper rubric unit %; not scored.
Evidence · table
“265”
Context: Table 1: Results from drill holes TOM-02
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 and Tom-2"
TOM-025-14Berrigan Mine · zincGrade: 7687Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 20.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TOM-025-14
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- GMX
Geometry
- Grade
- 7687
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 20.1 m
- From
- 182.1 m
- To
- 202.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 182.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TOM-025-14:182.1-202.2
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.55
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 7687 ppm zinc, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the zinc rubric unit %; not scored.
Evidence · table
“7687”
Context: Table 1: Results from drill holes TOM-02
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 and Tom-2"
TOM-025-14Berrigan Mine · goldGrade: 0.82Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 98.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TOM-025-14
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- GMX
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.82
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 98.5 m
- From
- 451.2 m
- To
- 549.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 451.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TOM-025-14:451.2-549.7
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 5.75
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.82 g/t gold is moderate against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 80.8 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.82”
Context: Table 1: Results from drill holes TOM-02
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 and Tom-2"
TOM-025-14Berrigan Mine · silverGrade: 3.21Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 98.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TOM-025-14
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- GMX
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.21
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 98.5 m
- From
- 451.2 m
- To
- 549.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 451.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TOM-025-14:451.2-549.7
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 5.75
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.21 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 316.2 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.21”
Context: Table 1: Results from drill holes TOM-02
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 and Tom-2"
TOM-025-14Berrigan Mine · copperGrade: 386Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 98.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TOM-025-14
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- GMX
Geometry
- Grade
- 386
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 98.5 m
- From
- 451.2 m
- To
- 549.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 451.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TOM-025-14:451.2-549.7
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 5.75
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 386 ppm copper, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the copper rubric unit %; not scored.
Evidence · table
“386”
Context: Table 1: Results from drill holes TOM-02
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 and Tom-2"
TOM-025-14Berrigan Mine · zincGrade: 19751Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 98.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TOM-025-14
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- GMX
Geometry
- Grade
- 19751
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 98.5 m
- From
- 451.2 m
- To
- 549.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 451.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TOM-025-14:451.2-549.7
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 5.75
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 19751 ppm zinc, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the zinc rubric unit %; not scored.
Evidence · table
“19751”
Context: Table 1: Results from drill holes TOM-02
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 and Tom-2"
TOM- 25-015Berrigan Mine · goldGrade: 4.69Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TOM- 25-015
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- GMX
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.69
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.9 m
- From
- 452.2 m
- To
- 457.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 452.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TOM- 25-015:452.2-457.1
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 26.67
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.69 g/t gold is strong against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 23.0 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 4.69 g/t gold is strong on the default band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.69”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 and Tom-2"
TOM- 25-015Berrigan Mine · silverGrade: 18.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TOM- 25-015
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- GMX
Geometry
- Grade
- 18.8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.9 m
- From
- 452.2 m
- To
- 457.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 452.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TOM- 25-015:452.2-457.1
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 26.67
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 18.8 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 92.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 18.8 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“18.80”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 and Tom-2"
TOM- 25-015Berrigan Mine · copperGrade: 2897Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 4.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TOM- 25-015
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- GMX
Geometry
- Grade
- 2897
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 4.9 m
- From
- 452.2 m
- To
- 457.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 452.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TOM- 25-015:452.2-457.1
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 26.67
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 2897 ppm copper, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the copper rubric unit %; not scored.
Evidence · table
“2897”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 and Tom-2"
andBerrigan Mine · goldGrade: 0.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 49.35 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- GMX
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.9
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 49.35 m
- From
- 500.35 m
- To
- 549.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 500.35 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:500.35-549.7
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 7.26
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.9 g/t gold is moderate against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 44.4 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.90”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 and Tom-2"
andBerrigan Mine · silverGrade: 3.48Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 49.35 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- GMX
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.48
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 49.35 m
- From
- 500.35 m
- To
- 549.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 500.35 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:500.35-549.7
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 7.26
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.48 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 171.7 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 3.48 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.48”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 and Tom-2"
andBerrigan Mine · copperGrade: 310Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 49.35 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- GMX
Geometry
- Grade
- 310
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 49.35 m
- From
- 500.35 m
- To
- 549.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 500.35 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:500.35-549.7
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 7.26
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 310 ppm copper, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the copper rubric unit %; not scored.
Evidence · table
“310”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 and Tom-2"
andBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 31250Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 49.35 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- GMX
Geometry
- Grade
- 31250
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 49.35 m
- From
- 500.35 m
- To
- 549.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 500.35 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:500.35-549.7
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 7.26
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 31250 ppm zinc, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the zinc rubric unit %; not scored.
Evidence · table
“31250”
Context: including
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 and Tom-2"
andBerrigan Mine · goldGrade: 1.34Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 14.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- GMX
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.34
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 14.6 m
- From
- 521 m
- To
- 535.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 521 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:521-535.6
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 10.26
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.34 g/t gold is moderate against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 19.6 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.34”
Context: Including
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 and Tom-2"
andBerrigan Mine · silverGrade: 5.91Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 14.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- GMX
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.91
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 14.6 m
- From
- 521 m
- To
- 535.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 521 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:521-535.6
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 10.26
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.91 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 86.3 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 5.91 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.91”
Context: Including
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 and Tom-2"
andBerrigan Mine · copperGrade: 420Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 14.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- GMX
Geometry
- Grade
- 420
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 14.6 m
- From
- 521 m
- To
- 535.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 521 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:521-535.6
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 10.26
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 420 ppm copper, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the copper rubric unit %; not scored.
Evidence · table
“420”
Context: Including
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 and Tom-2"
andBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 41158Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 14.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- GMX
Geometry
- Grade
- 41158
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 14.6 m
- From
- 521 m
- To
- 535.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 521 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:521-535.6
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 10.26
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 41158 ppm zinc, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the zinc rubric unit %; not scored.
Evidence · table
“41158”
Context: Including
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 and Tom-2"
andBerrigan Mine · goldGrade: 0.88Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- GMX
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.88
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.25 m
- From
- 537.85 m
- To
- 541.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 537.85 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:537.85-541.1
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 9.94
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.88 g/t gold is weak against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 2.9 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.88”
Context: Including
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 and Tom-2"
andBerrigan Mine · silverGrade: 3.85Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- GMX
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.85
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.25 m
- From
- 537.85 m
- To
- 541.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 537.85 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:537.85-541.1
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 9.94
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.85 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 12.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 3.85 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.85”
Context: Including
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 and Tom-2"
andBerrigan Mine · copperGrade: 529Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- GMX
Geometry
- Grade
- 529
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 3.25 m
- From
- 537.85 m
- To
- 541.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 537.85 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:537.85-541.1
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 9.94
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 529 ppm copper, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the copper rubric unit %; not scored.
Evidence · table
“529”
Context: Including
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 and Tom-2"
andBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 58200Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- GMX
Geometry
- Grade
- 58200
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 3.25 m
- From
- 537.85 m
- To
- 541.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 537.85 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:537.85-541.1
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 9.94
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 58200 ppm zinc, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the zinc rubric unit %; not scored.
Evidence · table
“58200”
Context: Including
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 and Tom-2"
andBerrigan Mine · goldGrade: 1.63Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- GMX
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.63
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.2 m
- From
- 542 m
- To
- 548.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 542 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:542-548.2
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 14.82
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.63 g/t gold is moderate against the default band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 10.1 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.63”
Context: Including
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 and Tom-2"
andBerrigan Mine · silverGrade: 5.26Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- GMX
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.26
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.2 m
- From
- 542 m
- To
- 548.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 542 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:542-548.2
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 14.82
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.26 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 32.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 5.26 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.26”
Context: Including
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 and Tom-2"
andBerrigan Mine · copperGrade: 511Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 6.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- GMX
Geometry
- Grade
- 511
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 6.2 m
- From
- 542 m
- To
- 548.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 542 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:542-548.2
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 14.82
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 511 ppm copper, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the copper rubric unit %; not scored.
Evidence · table
“511”
Context: Including
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 and Tom-2"
andBerrigan Mine · zincGrade: 74276Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 6.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- Berrigan Mine
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- GMX
Geometry
- Grade
- 74276
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 6.2 m
- From
- 542 m
- To
- 548.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 542 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:542-548.2
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Location
- Lower Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 14.82
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % Eq
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table: 74276 ppm zinc, reported in a unit the rubric does not cover (%).
Negative factors
- Grade unit ppm does not match the zinc rubric unit %; not scored.
Evidence · table
“74276”
Context: Including
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used. Requires an actual metal equivalent grade; a combined elemental basket such as PGE is not a metal equivalent.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Phase 1 drilling intersected the historical Berrigan Mine mineralization but also in two drill hole TOM-25-015 and Tom-2"
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.