Vendetta Commences Phase 1 Drilling Program at Its Pegmont Lead-Zinc Project
Original announcement by tmx on
- Company
- Vendetta Mining Corp.
- Ticker
- VTT
- Exchange
- TSX
- Region
- Queensland, Australia
- Primary commodity
- Lead
- Secondary commodities
- Zinc, Silver, Copper
- Document categories
- Drill results, Resource update
- Extracted
- 2026-09-13 07:03:58 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Vendetta Mining Corp. has commenced a Phase 1 drilling program at the Pegmont Lead-Zinc project in Queensland, Australia. The program targets underground extension, the Killer Bore Zinc prospect, and shallow open pit areas to improve resource confidence and test material types.
Reasoning: The company is initiating a new drilling phase to expand resources and test material types, building on a previously established resource.
Positive factors
- Commencement of multi-target drilling program
- High-grade historical intercepts cited
- Existing resource base established
Negative factors
- Historical resource data is from 2018
- RC drilling noted to potentially under-report grades
Facts used in scoring: 22
Classification and evidence
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: The program includes drilling to improve definition of material boundaries and expand Indicated resources.
Evidence · text
“improving the definition of the transition / sulphide material boundary”
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: The resource estimate contains a significant Inferred component.
Evidence · text
“Inferred 8,277 Kt @ 5.1% Pb”
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: Multiple independent qualified persons are named for the resource estimate.
Evidence · text
“Prepared by independent qualified persons (QPs) J.M. Shannon P.Geo”
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 22. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (16)
PVRD154Pegmont · leadGrade: 9.07Grade Unit: %Intercept: 15.92 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PVRD154
- Project
- Pegmont
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- australia_qld
- Ticker
- VTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 9.07
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 15.92 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-07-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: High grade lead intercept from a previous geotechnical hole.
Positive factors
- High grade intercept
Evidence · text
“PVRD154 15.92 m @ 9.07% Pb”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
PVRD154Pegmont · zincGrade: 3.04Grade Unit: %Intercept: 15.92 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PVRD154
- Project
- Pegmont
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- australia_qld
- Ticker
- VTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.04
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 15.92 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PVRD154:0-15.92
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-07-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Zinc component of high-grade historical intercept.
Evidence · text
“3.04 % Zn”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
AND041Killer Bore · zincGrade: 15.44Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AND041
- Project
- Killer Bore
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- australia_qld
- Ticker
- VTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 15.44
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-07-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historic high grade zinc intercept.
Positive factors
- High grade zinc
Evidence · text
“AND041: 3 m @ 15.44% Zn”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
AND041Killer Bore · copperGrade: 0.25Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AND041
- Project
- Killer Bore
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- australia_qld
- Ticker
- VTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.25
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- AND041:0-3.0
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-07-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Trace copper in historic intercept.
Evidence · text
“0.25% Cu”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
ANP418Killer Bore · zincGrade: 8.26Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- ANP418
- Project
- Killer Bore
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- australia_qld
- Ticker
- VTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.26
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-07-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historic high grade zinc intercept.
Evidence · text
“ANP418: 4 m @ 8.26% Zn”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
ANP418Killer Bore · copperGrade: 0.51Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- ANP418
- Project
- Killer Bore
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- australia_qld
- Ticker
- VTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.51
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- ANP418:0-4.0
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-07-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Copper component of historic intercept.
Evidence · text
“0.51% Cu”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
DDH01KB001Killer Bore · zincGrade: 10Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DDH01KB001
- Project
- Killer Bore
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- australia_qld
- Ticker
- VTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 10
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-07-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historic high grade zinc intercept.
Evidence · text
“DDH01KB001: 4 m @ 10% Zn”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
DDH01KB001Killer Bore · leadGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- DDH01KB001
- Project
- Killer Bore
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- australia_qld
- Ticker
- VTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- DDH01KB001:0-4.0
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-07-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Lead component of historic intercept.
Evidence · text
“0.2% Pb”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
PMR216Pegmont · leadGrade: 7.47Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PMR216
- Project
- Pegmont
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- australia_qld
- Ticker
- VTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.47
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-07-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: RC drill intercept being followed up.
Negative factors
- RC drilling noted to potentially under-report grades
Evidence · text
“PMR216: 5 m @ 7.47% Pb”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
PMR216Pegmont · zincGrade: 3.92Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PMR216
- Project
- Pegmont
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- australia_qld
- Ticker
- VTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.92
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PMR216:0-5.0
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-07-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Zinc component of RC drill intercept.
Negative factors
- RC drilling noted to potentially under-report grades
Evidence · text
“3.92% Zn”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
PMR081Pegmont · leadGrade: 5.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 14 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PMR081
- Project
- Pegmont
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- australia_qld
- Ticker
- VTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.4
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 14 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-07-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: RC drill intercept being followed up.
Negative factors
- RC drilling noted to potentially under-report grades
Evidence · text
“PMR081: 14 m @ 5.40% Pb”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
PMR081Pegmont · zincGrade: 4.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 14 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PMR081
- Project
- Pegmont
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- australia_qld
- Ticker
- VTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 14 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PMR081:0-14.0
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-07-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Zinc component of RC drill intercept.
Negative factors
- RC drilling noted to potentially under-report grades
Evidence · text
“4.1% Zn”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
PMR118Pegmont · leadGrade: 9.16Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PMR118
- Project
- Pegmont
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- australia_qld
- Ticker
- VTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 9.16
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 10 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-07-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: RC drill intercept being followed up.
Negative factors
- RC drilling noted to potentially under-report grades
Evidence · text
“PMR118: 10 m @ 9.16% Pb”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
PMR118Pegmont · zincGrade: 4.56Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PMR118
- Project
- Pegmont
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- australia_qld
- Ticker
- VTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.56
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 10 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PMR118:0-10.0
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-07-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Zinc component of RC drill intercept.
Negative factors
- RC drilling noted to potentially under-report grades
Evidence · text
“4.56% Zn”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
PGR017Pegmont · leadGrade: 7.56Grade Unit: %Intercept: 9.15 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PGR017
- Project
- Pegmont
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- australia_qld
- Ticker
- VTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.56
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 9.15 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-07-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: RC drill intercept being followed up.
Negative factors
- RC drilling noted to potentially under-report grades
Evidence · text
“PGR017: 9.15 m @ 7.56% Pb”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
PGR017Pegmont · zincGrade: 3.39Grade Unit: %Intercept: 9.15 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PGR017
- Project
- Pegmont
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- australia_qld
- Ticker
- VTT
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.39
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 9.15 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PGR017:0-9.15
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-07-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Zinc component of RC drill intercept.
Negative factors
- RC drilling noted to potentially under-report grades
Evidence · text
“3.39% Zn”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Resource Estimates (6)
indicatedPegmont · leadTonnes: 5758000Grade: 6.5Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Pegmont
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- Queensland, Australia
- Ticker
- VTT
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- other
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- J.M. Shannon, D Nussipakynova, M. Angus, P. Lebleu, A Riles
- Resource group id
- resource:54ed86c6c7a5e8218516
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 5758000
- Grade
- 6.5
- Grade Unit
- %
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2018-07-31
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-07-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Indicated resource component for lead.
Positive factors
- Indicated category
Evidence · text
“Indicated 5,758 Kt @ 6.5% Pb”
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Stale Estimatenegative
Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.
Why it applies: effective date is 3.9 years before this release
indicatedPegmont · zincTonnes: 5758000Grade: 2.6Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Pegmont
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- Queensland, Australia
- Ticker
- VTT
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- other
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- J.M. Shannon, D Nussipakynova, M. Angus, P. Lebleu, A Riles
- Resource group id
- resource:54ed86c6c7a5e8218516
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 5758000
- Grade
- 2.6
- Grade Unit
- %
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2018-07-31
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-07-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Indicated resource component for zinc.
Evidence · text
“2.6% Zn”
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Stale Estimatenegative
Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.
Why it applies: effective date is 3.9 years before this release
indicatedPegmont · silverTonnes: 5758000Grade: 11Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Pegmont
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- Queensland, Australia
- Ticker
- VTT
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- other
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- J.M. Shannon, D Nussipakynova, M. Angus, P. Lebleu, A Riles
- Resource group id
- resource:54ed86c6c7a5e8218516
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 5758000
- Grade
- 11
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2018-07-31
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-07-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Indicated resource component for silver.
Evidence · text
“11 g/t Ag”
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Stale Estimatenegative
Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.
Why it applies: effective date is 3.9 years before this release
inferredPegmont · leadTonnes: 8277000Grade: 5.1Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Pegmont
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- Queensland, Australia
- Ticker
- VTT
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- other
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- J.M. Shannon, D Nussipakynova, M. Angus, P. Lebleu, A Riles
- Resource group id
- resource:3be187cf1ec2615b5da8
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 8277000
- Grade
- 5.1
- Grade Unit
- %
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2018-07-31
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-07-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Inferred resource component for lead.
Negative factors
- Inferred category
Evidence · text
“Inferred 8,277 Kt @ 5.1% Pb”
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Stale Estimatenegative
Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.
Why it applies: effective date is 3.9 years before this release
inferredPegmont · zincTonnes: 8277000Grade: 2.8Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Pegmont
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- Queensland, Australia
- Ticker
- VTT
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- other
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- J.M. Shannon, D Nussipakynova, M. Angus, P. Lebleu, A Riles
- Resource group id
- resource:3be187cf1ec2615b5da8
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 8277000
- Grade
- 2.8
- Grade Unit
- %
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2018-07-31
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-07-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Inferred resource component for zinc.
Negative factors
- Inferred category
Evidence · text
“2.8% Zn”
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Stale Estimatenegative
Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.
Why it applies: effective date is 3.9 years before this release
inferredPegmont · silverTonnes: 8277000Grade: 8Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Pegmont
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- Queensland, Australia
- Ticker
- VTT
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- other
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- J.M. Shannon, D Nussipakynova, M. Angus, P. Lebleu, A Riles
- Resource group id
- resource:3be187cf1ec2615b5da8
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 8277000
- Grade
- 8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2018-07-31
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2022-07-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Inferred resource component for silver.
Negative factors
- Inferred category
Evidence · text
“8 g/t Ag”
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Stale Estimatenegative
Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.
Why it applies: effective date is 3.9 years before this release
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.