[Video Enhanced] West Red Lake Gold Drills 904 Complex Hitting 215.26 g/t Gold over 5.35 Metres
Original announcement by tmx on
- Company
- West Red Lake Gold
- Ticker
- WRLG
- Exchange
- TSX
- Region
- Ontario, Canada
- Primary commodity
- Gold
- Secondary commodities
- None reported
- Document categories
- Drill results
- Extracted
- 2026-09-15 06:59:44 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
West Red Lake Gold has reported exceptional drill results from the new 904 Complex at the Madsen Mine Project, headlined by an intercept of 215.26 g/t gold over 5.35 metres. The results represent a high-grade panel of mineralization that has seen little historical mining, offering significant potential for large-scale extraction.
Reasoning: The intercept of 215.26 g/t Au over 5.35m is an exceptional bonanza grade for an orogenic gold system, significantly exceeding the 75th percentile of peer deposits. The results come from a new high-grade panel (904 Complex) with significant vertical extent remaining.
Positive factors
- Bonanza grade intercept
- High-grade panel discovery
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Step-Out Extension
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Facts used in scoring: 1
Classification and evidence
Bonanza Interceptpositive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Why it applies: 215.26 g/t gold is exceptionally high for an orogenic gold deposit.
Evidence · text
“215.26 g/t Gold over 5.35 Metres”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: The release includes a sign-off by a Qualified Person (Will Robinson, P.Geo.).
Evidence · text
“reviewed and approved by Will Robinson, P.Geo., Vice President of Exploration for West Red Lake Gold and the Qualified Person”
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: The document states true thickness has not been calculated, only an expectation based on angles.
Evidence · text
“True thickness has not been calculated, but is expected to be ≥ 70% of downhole length”
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 1. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (1)
Fact 1Madsen Mine · goldGrade: 215.26Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.35 mNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Madsen Mine
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_on
- Reported Region
- canada_on
- Ticker
- WRLG
Geometry
- Grade
- 215.26
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.35 m
- From
- 650 m
- To
- 655.35 m
- Intercept Depth
- 650 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- orogenic
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Madsen_Mine:650-655.35
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- 904 Complex
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- drill_no_hole_id
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-04-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: 215.26 g/t gold over 5.35m is an exceptional bonanza grade for an orogenic gold deposit; however, true width is not explicitly stated, only expected to be >= 70% of downhole length.
Positive factors
- Bonanza Intercept
Negative factors
- Apparent Width Only
Evidence · text
“215.26 g/t Gold over 5.35 Metres”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.