Viscount Mining Drills Visible Silver-Bearing Mineralization Across First Three Holes at the Kate Resource in Silver Cliff
Original announcement by tmx on
- Company
- Viscount Mining Corp.
- Ticker
- VML
- Exchange
- TSX
- Region
- Custer County, Colorado
- Primary commodity
- Silver
- Secondary commodities
- Gold, Copper
- Document categories
- Drill results
- Extracted
- 2026-09-13 06:36:09 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Viscount Mining has completed the first three holes of its 2026 core drilling program at the Kate Resource in Silver Cliff, Colorado, intersecting visible silver-bearing mineralization. The drilling targets Tr2 and Tr3 rhyolite host units, confirming the geological model and extending the prospective stratigraphy. Assays for the new holes are pending. The company also re-released significant historical high-grade silver intercepts from previous campaigns, with grades up to 3,280 g/t Ag.
Reasoning: The announcement reports visible silver mineralization in new drill holes, confirming the geological model and extending the prospective area. However, the lack of new assay results for the current program means the economic significance is yet to be determined. The document also re-releases significant historical high-grade silver intercepts, which are positive but not novel.
Positive factors
- Visible silver-bearing mineralization observed in new drill holes, confirming geological model.
- New drilling extends prospective stratigraphy in two directions.
- QA/QC procedures are disclosed and a Qualified Person has reviewed the technical information.
- Historical drill results show high-grade silver intercepts.
Negative factors
- Assay results for the current drilling program are pending, so no new quantitative results are available.
- Historical drill results are re-released data, not new information.
- True widths for reported historical intercepts are not known, potentially overstating apparent widths.
Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.
Facts used in scoring: 42
Classification and evidence
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: The release details the company's rigorous quality assurance/quality control program, including core handling, logging, cutting, and insertion of standards, blanks, and duplicates.
Evidence · text
“The Company has implemented a rigorous quality assurance/quality control program at the Silver Cliff project. Core is retrieved from the drill site to a locked storage facility, where it is logged on site by Christina Ricks, project geologist, and then cut by independent geologists. Half of the core is bagged, and standards, blanks and duplicates are frequently inserted into the sample stream.”
QP/CP Signedpositive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: The scientific and technical information in the news release has been reviewed and approved by Harald Hoegberg, P.G., an independent consulting geologist and Qualified Person under NI 43-101.
Evidence · text
“The scientific and technical information contained in this news release has been reviewed and approved by Harald Hoegberg, P.G., an independent consulting geologist who is a "Qualified Person" (QP) as such term is defined under National Instrument 43-101 — Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects ("NI 43-101").”
Visible Mineralizationpositive · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Why it applies: The company reports observing visible silver-bearing mineralization, including galena, manganese-oxide-rich breccias, and possible acanthite, in the new drill holes.
Evidence · text
“Viscount Mining Drills Visible Silver-Bearing Mineralization Across First Three Holes at the Kate Resource in Silver Cliff ... visible galena, manganese-oxide-rich breccias, and possible acanthite confirm the geological model; assays pending”
Assays Pendingnegative · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Why it applies: The announcement explicitly states that assay results for the current 2026 drilling program are pending, meaning no new quantitative results are yet available.
Evidence · text
“assays pending”
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: The document includes a table of 'Significant Historic Intervals' from prior drill campaigns (2016, 2017, 2020, 2021), which are not new assay results.
Evidence · text
“Table 1 — Significant Historic Intervals from Viscount's KSR Drill Program (Tr2 and Tr3 Rhyolite Hosts) A summary of all notable Viscount KSR drill hole intervals returned prior to the 2026 campaign.”
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 42. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (42)
16-01Kate Silver Resource · silverGrade: 923.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 16-01
- Project
- Kate Silver Resource
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_co
- Reported Region
- usa_co
- Ticker
- VML
Geometry
- Grade
- 923.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 13.7 m
- From
- 18.3 m
- To
- 32 m
- Intercept Depth
- 18.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 16-01:18.3-32
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Kate Silver Resource
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- low
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Skyline Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2016-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows an exceptional silver grade over a significant length, confirming high-grade mineralization at the Kate Silver Resource, but it is not new information and true width is unknown.
Positive factors
- Exceptional silver grade
- Strong intercept length
- Confirms high-grade mineralization
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“923.7”
Context: 13.7
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Reason: The silver grade of 923.7 g/t is well above the exceptional threshold of 500 g/t for silver.
Evidence · table
“923.7”
Context: 13.7
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document explicitly states that intervals are core-length and true widths are not known.
Evidence · text
“Note: Intervals reported above are core-length intervals; true widths are not known.”
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This intercept is from a 2016 drill campaign and is being re-released in this document.
Evidence · table
“16-01”
Context: 13.7
16-01Kate Silver Resource · silverGrade: 2330Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 16-01
- Project
- Kate Silver Resource
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_co
- Reported Region
- usa_co
- Ticker
- VML
Geometry
- Grade
- 2330
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 18.3 m
- To
- 21.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 18.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 16-01:18.3-21.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Kate Silver Resource
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- low
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Skyline Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2016-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical sub-interval shows an extremely high-grade silver concentration, indicating bonanza-grade mineralization within the broader intercept, but it is not new information and true width is unknown.
Positive factors
- Extremely high-grade silver sub-interval
- Confirms bonanza mineralization within broader zone
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
- Exact depth not specified
Evidence · table
“2330 g/t”
Context: 3.0 m
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Reason: The silver grade of 2330 g/t is significantly above the exceptional threshold of 500 g/t for silver.
Evidence · table
“2330 g/t”
Context: 3.0 m
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document explicitly states that intervals are core-length and true widths are not known.
Evidence · text
“Note: Intervals reported above are core-length intervals; true widths are not known.”
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This intercept is from a 2016 drill campaign and is being re-released in this document.
Evidence · table
“16-01”
Context: 3.0 m
16-03Kate Silver Resource · silverGrade: 241.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 16-03
- Project
- Kate Silver Resource
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_co
- Reported Region
- usa_co
- Ticker
- VML
Geometry
- Grade
- 241.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9.1 m
- From
- 25 m
- To
- 34.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 25 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 16-03:25-34.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Kate Silver Resource
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- low
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Skyline Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2016-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a strong silver grade over a good length, confirming high-grade mineralization at the Kate Silver Resource, but it is not new information and true width is unknown.
Positive factors
- Strong silver grade
- Good intercept length
- Confirms high-grade mineralization
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“241.1”
Context: 9.1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document explicitly states that intervals are core-length and true widths are not known.
Evidence · text
“Note: Intervals reported above are core-length intervals; true widths are not known.”
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This intercept is from a 2016 drill campaign and is being re-released in this document.
Evidence · table
“16-03”
Context: 9.1
16-03Kate Silver Resource · silverGrade: 694Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 16-03
- Project
- Kate Silver Resource
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_co
- Reported Region
- usa_co
- Ticker
- VML
Geometry
- Grade
- 694
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 25 m
- To
- 26.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 25 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 16-03:25-26.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Kate Silver Resource
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- low
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Skyline Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2016-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical sub-interval shows an exceptional silver grade, indicating bonanza-grade mineralization within the broader intercept, but it is not new information and true width is unknown.
Positive factors
- Exceptional silver grade sub-interval
- Confirms bonanza mineralization within broader zone
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
- Exact depth not specified
Evidence · table
“694 g/t”
Context: 1.5 m
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Reason: The silver grade of 694 g/t is above the exceptional threshold of 500 g/t for silver.
Evidence · table
“694 g/t”
Context: 1.5 m
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document explicitly states that intervals are core-length and true widths are not known.
Evidence · text
“Note: Intervals reported above are core-length intervals; true widths are not known.”
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This intercept is from a 2016 drill campaign and is being re-released in this document.
Evidence · table
“16-03”
Context: 1.5 m
16-04Kate Silver Resource · silverGrade: 191.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 19.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 16-04
- Project
- Kate Silver Resource
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_co
- Reported Region
- usa_co
- Ticker
- VML
Geometry
- Grade
- 191.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 19.8 m
- From
- 17.1 m
- To
- 36.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 17.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 16-04:17.1-36.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Kate Silver Resource
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- low
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Skyline Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2016-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a moderate silver grade over a significant length, confirming mineralization at the Kate Silver Resource, but it is not new information and true width is unknown.
Positive factors
- Moderate silver grade
- Significant intercept length
- Confirms mineralization
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“191.4”
Context: 19.8
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document explicitly states that intervals are core-length and true widths are not known.
Evidence · text
“Note: Intervals reported above are core-length intervals; true widths are not known.”
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This intercept is from a 2016 drill campaign and is being re-released in this document.
Evidence · table
“16-04”
Context: 19.8
16-04Kate Silver Resource · silverGrade: 929Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 16-04
- Project
- Kate Silver Resource
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_co
- Reported Region
- usa_co
- Ticker
- VML
Geometry
- Grade
- 929
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 17.1 m
- To
- 18.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 17.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 16-04:17.1-18.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Kate Silver Resource
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- low
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Skyline Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2016-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical sub-interval shows an exceptional silver grade, indicating bonanza-grade mineralization within the broader intercept, but it is not new information and true width is unknown.
Positive factors
- Exceptional silver grade sub-interval
- Confirms bonanza mineralization within broader zone
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
- Exact depth not specified
Evidence · table
“929 g/t”
Context: 1.5 m
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Reason: The silver grade of 929 g/t is above the exceptional threshold of 500 g/t for silver.
Evidence · table
“929 g/t”
Context: 1.5 m
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document explicitly states that intervals are core-length and true widths are not known.
Evidence · text
“Note: Intervals reported above are core-length intervals; true widths are not known.”
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This intercept is from a 2016 drill campaign and is being re-released in this document.
Evidence · table
“16-04”
Context: 1.5 m
16-05Kate Silver Resource · silverGrade: 390.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 16-05
- Project
- Kate Silver Resource
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_co
- Reported Region
- usa_co
- Ticker
- VML
Geometry
- Grade
- 390.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 13.7 m
- From
- 19.8 m
- To
- 33.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 19.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 16-05:19.8-33.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Kate Silver Resource
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- low
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Skyline Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2016-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a strong silver grade over a good length, confirming high-grade mineralization at the Kate Silver Resource, but it is not new information and true width is unknown.
Positive factors
- Strong silver grade
- Good intercept length
- Confirms high-grade mineralization
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“390.5”
Context: 13.7
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document explicitly states that intervals are core-length and true widths are not known.
Evidence · text
“Note: Intervals reported above are core-length intervals; true widths are not known.”
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This intercept is from a 2016 drill campaign and is being re-released in this document.
Evidence · table
“16-05”
Context: 13.7
16-05Kate Silver Resource · silverGrade: 942.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 16-05
- Project
- Kate Silver Resource
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_co
- Reported Region
- usa_co
- Ticker
- VML
Geometry
- Grade
- 942.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.1 m
- From
- 19.8 m
- To
- 22.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 19.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 16-05:19.8-22.9
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Kate Silver Resource
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- low
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Skyline Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2016-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical sub-interval shows an exceptional silver grade, indicating bonanza-grade mineralization within the broader intercept, but it is not new information and true width is unknown.
Positive factors
- Exceptional silver grade sub-interval
- Confirms bonanza mineralization within broader zone
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
- Exact depth not specified
Evidence · table
“942.2 g/t”
Context: 3.1 m
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Reason: The silver grade of 942.2 g/t is above the exceptional threshold of 500 g/t for silver.
Evidence · table
“942.2 g/t”
Context: 3.1 m
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document explicitly states that intervals are core-length and true widths are not known.
Evidence · text
“Note: Intervals reported above are core-length intervals; true widths are not known.”
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This intercept is from a 2016 drill campaign and is being re-released in this document.
Evidence · table
“16-05”
Context: 3.1 m
16-07Kate Silver Resource · silverGrade: 153.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 15.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 16-07
- Project
- Kate Silver Resource
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_co
- Reported Region
- usa_co
- Ticker
- VML
Geometry
- Grade
- 153.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 15.2 m
- From
- 23.5 m
- To
- 38.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 23.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 16-07:23.5-38.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Kate Silver Resource
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- low
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Skyline Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2016-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a moderate silver grade over a significant length, confirming mineralization at the Kate Silver Resource, but it is not new information and true width is unknown.
Positive factors
- Moderate silver grade
- Significant intercept length
- Confirms mineralization
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“153.2”
Context: 15.2
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document explicitly states that intervals are core-length and true widths are not known.
Evidence · text
“Note: Intervals reported above are core-length intervals; true widths are not known.”
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This intercept is from a 2016 drill campaign and is being re-released in this document.
Evidence · table
“16-07”
Context: 15.2
16-07Kate Silver Resource · silverGrade: 252.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 16-07
- Project
- Kate Silver Resource
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_co
- Reported Region
- usa_co
- Ticker
- VML
Geometry
- Grade
- 252.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 7.6 m
- From
- 23.5 m
- To
- 31.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 23.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 16-07:23.5-31.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Kate Silver Resource
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- low
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Skyline Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2016-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical sub-interval shows a strong silver grade, indicating high-grade mineralization within the broader intercept, but it is not new information and true width is unknown.
Positive factors
- Strong silver grade sub-interval
- Confirms high-grade mineralization within broader zone
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
- Exact depth not specified
Evidence · table
“252.7 g/t”
Context: 7.6 m
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document explicitly states that intervals are core-length and true widths are not known.
Evidence · text
“Note: Intervals reported above are core-length intervals; true widths are not known.”
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This intercept is from a 2016 drill campaign and is being re-released in this document.
Evidence · table
“16-07”
Context: 7.6 m
16-08Kate Silver Resource · silverGrade: 230.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 20.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 16-08
- Project
- Kate Silver Resource
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_co
- Reported Region
- usa_co
- Ticker
- VML
Geometry
- Grade
- 230.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 20.7 m
- From
- 32 m
- To
- 52.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 32 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 16-08:32-52.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Kate Silver Resource
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- low
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Skyline Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2016-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a strong silver grade over a significant length, confirming high-grade mineralization at the Kate Silver Resource, but it is not new information and true width is unknown.
Positive factors
- Strong silver grade
- Significant intercept length
- Confirms high-grade mineralization
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“230.5”
Context: 20.7
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document explicitly states that intervals are core-length and true widths are not known.
Evidence · text
“Note: Intervals reported above are core-length intervals; true widths are not known.”
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This intercept is from a 2016 drill campaign and is being re-released in this document.
Evidence · table
“16-08”
Context: 20.7
16-08Kate Silver Resource · silverGrade: 780.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 16-08
- Project
- Kate Silver Resource
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_co
- Reported Region
- usa_co
- Ticker
- VML
Geometry
- Grade
- 780.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.1 m
- From
- 32 m
- To
- 35.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 32 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 16-08:32-35.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Kate Silver Resource
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- low
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Skyline Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2016-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical sub-interval shows an exceptional silver grade, indicating bonanza-grade mineralization within the broader intercept, but it is not new information and true width is unknown.
Positive factors
- Exceptional silver grade sub-interval
- Confirms bonanza mineralization within broader zone
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
- Exact depth not specified
Evidence · table
“780.5 g/t”
Context: 3.1 m
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Reason: The silver grade of 780.5 g/t is above the exceptional threshold of 500 g/t for silver.
Evidence · table
“780.5 g/t”
Context: 3.1 m
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document explicitly states that intervals are core-length and true widths are not known.
Evidence · text
“Note: Intervals reported above are core-length intervals; true widths are not known.”
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This intercept is from a 2016 drill campaign and is being re-released in this document.
Evidence · table
“16-08”
Context: 3.1 m
16-09Kate Silver Resource · silverGrade: 126.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 16.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 16-09
- Project
- Kate Silver Resource
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_co
- Reported Region
- usa_co
- Ticker
- VML
Geometry
- Grade
- 126.8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 16.8 m
- From
- 25.9 m
- To
- 42.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 25.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 16-09:25.9-42.7
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Kate Silver Resource
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- low
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Skyline Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2016-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a moderate silver grade over a significant length, confirming mineralization at the Kate Silver Resource, but it is not new information and true width is unknown.
Positive factors
- Moderate silver grade
- Significant intercept length
- Confirms mineralization
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“126.8”
Context: 16.8
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document explicitly states that intervals are core-length and true widths are not known.
Evidence · text
“Note: Intervals reported above are core-length intervals; true widths are not known.”
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This intercept is from a 2016 drill campaign and is being re-released in this document.
Evidence · table
“16-09”
Context: 16.8
16-09Kate Silver Resource · silverGrade: 220.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 16-09
- Project
- Kate Silver Resource
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_co
- Reported Region
- usa_co
- Ticker
- VML
Geometry
- Grade
- 220.8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 7.6 m
- From
- 25.9 m
- To
- 33.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 25.9 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 16-09:25.9-33.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Kate Silver Resource
- Dip
- -60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- low
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Skyline Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2016-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical sub-interval shows a strong silver grade, indicating high-grade mineralization within the broader intercept, but it is not new information and true width is unknown.
Positive factors
- Strong silver grade sub-interval
- Confirms high-grade mineralization within broader zone
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
- Exact depth not specified
Evidence · table
“220.8 g/t”
Context: 7.6 m
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document explicitly states that intervals are core-length and true widths are not known.
Evidence · text
“Note: Intervals reported above are core-length intervals; true widths are not known.”
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This intercept is from a 2016 drill campaign and is being re-released in this document.
Evidence · table
“16-09”
Context: 7.6 m
17-01Kate Silver Resource · silverGrade: 113.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 17-01
- Project
- Kate Silver Resource
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_co
- Reported Region
- usa_co
- Ticker
- VML
Geometry
- Grade
- 113.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9 m
- From
- 24 m
- To
- 33 m
- Intercept Depth
- 24 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 17-01:24-33
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Kate Silver Resource
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- low
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Skyline Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2017-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a moderate silver grade over a good length, confirming mineralization at the Kate Silver Resource, but it is not new information and true width is unknown.
Positive factors
- Moderate silver grade
- Good intercept length
- Confirms mineralization
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“113.5”
Context: 9
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document explicitly states that intervals are core-length and true widths are not known.
Evidence · text
“Note: Intervals reported above are core-length intervals; true widths are not known.”
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This intercept is from a 2017 drill campaign and is being re-released in this document.
Evidence · table
“17-01”
Context: 9
17-01Kate Silver Resource · silverGrade: 237.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 17-01
- Project
- Kate Silver Resource
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_co
- Reported Region
- usa_co
- Ticker
- VML
Geometry
- Grade
- 237.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 24 m
- To
- 27 m
- Intercept Depth
- 24 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 17-01:24-27
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Kate Silver Resource
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- low
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Skyline Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2017-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical sub-interval shows a strong silver grade, indicating high-grade mineralization within the broader intercept, but it is not new information and true width is unknown.
Positive factors
- Strong silver grade sub-interval
- Confirms high-grade mineralization within broader zone
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
- Exact depth not specified
Evidence · table
“237.5 g/t”
Context: 3.0 m
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document explicitly states that intervals are core-length and true widths are not known.
Evidence · text
“Note: Intervals reported above are core-length intervals; true widths are not known.”
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This intercept is from a 2017 drill campaign and is being re-released in this document.
Evidence · table
“17-01”
Context: 3.0 m
17-02Kate Silver Resource · silverGrade: 93.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 33 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 17-02
- Project
- Kate Silver Resource
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_co
- Reported Region
- usa_co
- Ticker
- VML
Geometry
- Grade
- 93.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 33 m
- From
- 1.5 m
- To
- 34.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 17-02:1.5-34.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Kate Silver Resource
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- low
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Skyline Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2017-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a moderate silver grade over a significant length, confirming mineralization at the Kate Silver Resource, but it is not new information and true width is unknown.
Positive factors
- Moderate silver grade
- Significant intercept length
- Confirms mineralization
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“93.4”
Context: 33
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document explicitly states that intervals are core-length and true widths are not known.
Evidence · text
“Note: Intervals reported above are core-length intervals; true widths are not known.”
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This intercept is from a 2017 drill campaign and is being re-released in this document.
Evidence · table
“17-02”
Context: 33
17-02Kate Silver Resource · silverGrade: 214.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 17-02
- Project
- Kate Silver Resource
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_co
- Reported Region
- usa_co
- Ticker
- VML
Geometry
- Grade
- 214.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 1.5 m
- To
- 7.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 17-02:1.5-7.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Kate Silver Resource
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- low
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Skyline Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2017-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical sub-interval shows a strong silver grade, indicating high-grade mineralization within the broader intercept, but it is not new information and true width is unknown.
Positive factors
- Strong silver grade sub-interval
- Confirms high-grade mineralization within broader zone
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
- Exact depth not specified
Evidence · table
“214.5 g/t”
Context: 6.0 m
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document explicitly states that intervals are core-length and true widths are not known.
Evidence · text
“Note: Intervals reported above are core-length intervals; true widths are not known.”
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This intercept is from a 2017 drill campaign and is being re-released in this document.
Evidence · table
“17-02”
Context: 6.0 m
17-04Kate Silver Resource · silverGrade: 122.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 21 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 17-04
- Project
- Kate Silver Resource
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_co
- Reported Region
- usa_co
- Ticker
- VML
Geometry
- Grade
- 122.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 21 m
- From
- 16.5 m
- To
- 37.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 16.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 17-04:16.5-37.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Kate Silver Resource
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- low
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Skyline Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2017-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a moderate silver grade over a significant length, confirming mineralization at the Kate Silver Resource, but it is not new information and true width is unknown.
Positive factors
- Moderate silver grade
- Significant intercept length
- Confirms mineralization
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“122.2”
Context: 21
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document explicitly states that intervals are core-length and true widths are not known.
Evidence · text
“Note: Intervals reported above are core-length intervals; true widths are not known.”
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This intercept is from a 2017 drill campaign and is being re-released in this document.
Evidence · table
“17-04”
Context: 21
17-04Kate Silver Resource · silverGrade: 401Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 17-04
- Project
- Kate Silver Resource
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_co
- Reported Region
- usa_co
- Ticker
- VML
Geometry
- Grade
- 401
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 16.5 m
- To
- 19.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 16.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 17-04:16.5-19.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Kate Silver Resource
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- low
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Skyline Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2017-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical sub-interval shows a strong silver grade, indicating high-grade mineralization within the broader intercept, but it is not new information and true width is unknown.
Positive factors
- Strong silver grade sub-interval
- Confirms high-grade mineralization within broader zone
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
- Exact depth not specified
Evidence · table
“401.0 g/t”
Context: 3.0 m
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document explicitly states that intervals are core-length and true widths are not known.
Evidence · text
“Note: Intervals reported above are core-length intervals; true widths are not known.”
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This intercept is from a 2017 drill campaign and is being re-released in this document.
Evidence · table
“17-04”
Context: 3.0 m
17-05Kate Silver Resource · silverGrade: 279.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 15 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 17-05
- Project
- Kate Silver Resource
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_co
- Reported Region
- usa_co
- Ticker
- VML
Geometry
- Grade
- 279.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 15 m
- From
- 9.5 m
- To
- 24.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 9.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 17-05:9.5-24.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Kate Silver Resource
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- low
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Skyline Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2017-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a strong silver grade over a good length, confirming high-grade mineralization at the Kate Silver Resource, but it is not new information and true width is unknown.
Positive factors
- Strong silver grade
- Good intercept length
- Confirms high-grade mineralization
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“279.6”
Context: 15
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document explicitly states that intervals are core-length and true widths are not known.
Evidence · text
“Note: Intervals reported above are core-length intervals; true widths are not known.”
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This intercept is from a 2017 drill campaign and is being re-released in this document.
Evidence · table
“17-05”
Context: 15
17-05Kate Silver Resource · silverGrade: 477Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 17-05
- Project
- Kate Silver Resource
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_co
- Reported Region
- usa_co
- Ticker
- VML
Geometry
- Grade
- 477
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 7.5 m
- From
- 9.5 m
- To
- 17 m
- Intercept Depth
- 9.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 17-05:9.5-17
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Kate Silver Resource
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- low
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Skyline Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2017-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical sub-interval shows a strong silver grade, indicating high-grade mineralization within the broader intercept, but it is not new information and true width is unknown.
Positive factors
- Strong silver grade sub-interval
- Confirms high-grade mineralization within broader zone
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
- Exact depth not specified
Evidence · table
“477.0 g/t”
Context: 7.5 m
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document explicitly states that intervals are core-length and true widths are not known.
Evidence · text
“Note: Intervals reported above are core-length intervals; true widths are not known.”
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This intercept is from a 2017 drill campaign and is being re-released in this document.
Evidence · table
“17-05”
Context: 7.5 m
17-06Kate Silver Resource · silverGrade: 149.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 24.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 17-06
- Project
- Kate Silver Resource
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_co
- Reported Region
- usa_co
- Ticker
- VML
Geometry
- Grade
- 149.9
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 24.5 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 24.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 17-06:0-24.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Kate Silver Resource
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- low
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Skyline Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2017-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a moderate silver grade over a significant length, confirming mineralization at the Kate Silver Resource, but it is not new information and true width is unknown.
Positive factors
- Moderate silver grade
- Significant intercept length
- Confirms mineralization
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“149.9”
Context: 24.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document explicitly states that intervals are core-length and true widths are not known.
Evidence · text
“Note: Intervals reported above are core-length intervals; true widths are not known.”
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This intercept is from a 2017 drill campaign and is being re-released in this document.
Evidence · table
“17-06”
Context: 24.5
17-06Kate Silver Resource · silverGrade: 668Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 17-06
- Project
- Kate Silver Resource
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_co
- Reported Region
- usa_co
- Ticker
- VML
Geometry
- Grade
- 668
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 1.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 17-06:0-1.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Kate Silver Resource
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- low
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Skyline Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2017-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical sub-interval shows an exceptional silver grade, indicating bonanza-grade mineralization within the broader intercept, but it is not new information and true width is unknown.
Positive factors
- Exceptional silver grade sub-interval
- Confirms bonanza mineralization within broader zone
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
- Exact depth not specified
Evidence · table
“668.0 g/t”
Context: 1.5 m
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Reason: The silver grade of 668.0 g/t is above the exceptional threshold of 500 g/t for silver.
Evidence · table
“668.0 g/t”
Context: 1.5 m
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document explicitly states that intervals are core-length and true widths are not known.
Evidence · text
“Note: Intervals reported above are core-length intervals; true widths are not known.”
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This intercept is from a 2017 drill campaign and is being re-released in this document.
Evidence · table
“17-06”
Context: 1.5 m
17-07Kate Silver Resource · silverGrade: 64.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 18 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 17-07
- Project
- Kate Silver Resource
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_co
- Reported Region
- usa_co
- Ticker
- VML
Geometry
- Grade
- 64.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 18 m
- From
- 6 m
- To
- 24 m
- Intercept Depth
- 6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 17-07:6-24
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Kate Silver Resource
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- low
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Skyline Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2017-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a weak silver grade over a significant length, confirming mineralization at the Kate Silver Resource, but it is not new information and true width is unknown.
Positive factors
- Weak silver grade
- Significant intercept length
- Confirms mineralization
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“64.3”
Context: 18
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document explicitly states that intervals are core-length and true widths are not known.
Evidence · text
“Note: Intervals reported above are core-length intervals; true widths are not known.”
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This intercept is from a 2017 drill campaign and is being re-released in this document.
Evidence · table
“17-07”
Context: 18
17-07Kate Silver Resource · silverGrade: 142Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 17-07
- Project
- Kate Silver Resource
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_co
- Reported Region
- usa_co
- Ticker
- VML
Geometry
- Grade
- 142
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 6 m
- To
- 7.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 17-07:6-7.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Kate Silver Resource
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- low
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Skyline Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2017-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical sub-interval shows a moderate silver grade, indicating mineralization within the broader intercept, but it is not new information and true width is unknown.
Positive factors
- Moderate silver grade sub-interval
- Confirms mineralization within broader zone
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
- Exact depth not specified
Evidence · table
“142.0 g/t”
Context: 1.5 m
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document explicitly states that intervals are core-length and true widths are not known.
Evidence · text
“Note: Intervals reported above are core-length intervals; true widths are not known.”
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This intercept is from a 2017 drill campaign and is being re-released in this document.
Evidence · table
“17-07”
Context: 1.5 m
17-10Kate Silver Resource · silverGrade: 109.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 22.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 17-10
- Project
- Kate Silver Resource
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_co
- Reported Region
- usa_co
- Ticker
- VML
Geometry
- Grade
- 109.7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 22.5 m
- From
- 24 m
- To
- 46.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 24 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 17-10:24-46.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Kate Silver Resource
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- low
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Skyline Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2017-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a moderate silver grade over a significant length, confirming mineralization at the Kate Silver Resource, but it is not new information and true width is unknown.
Positive factors
- Moderate silver grade
- Significant intercept length
- Confirms mineralization
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“109.7”
Context: 22.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document explicitly states that intervals are core-length and true widths are not known.
Evidence · text
“Note: Intervals reported above are core-length intervals; true widths are not known.”
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This intercept is from a 2017 drill campaign and is being re-released in this document.
Evidence · table
“17-10”
Context: 22.5
17-10Kate Silver Resource · silverGrade: 195Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 17-10
- Project
- Kate Silver Resource
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_co
- Reported Region
- usa_co
- Ticker
- VML
Geometry
- Grade
- 195
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.5 m
- From
- 24 m
- To
- 28.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 24 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 17-10:24-28.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Kate Silver Resource
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- low
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Skyline Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2017-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical sub-interval shows a moderate silver grade, indicating mineralization within the broader intercept, but it is not new information and true width is unknown.
Positive factors
- Moderate silver grade sub-interval
- Confirms mineralization within broader zone
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
- Exact depth not specified
Evidence · table
“195 g/t”
Context: 4.5 m
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document explicitly states that intervals are core-length and true widths are not known.
Evidence · text
“Note: Intervals reported above are core-length intervals; true widths are not known.”
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This intercept is from a 2017 drill campaign and is being re-released in this document.
Evidence · table
“17-10”
Context: 4.5 m
20-01Kate Silver Resource · silverGrade: 100.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 21.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 20-01
- Project
- Kate Silver Resource
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_co
- Reported Region
- usa_co
- Ticker
- VML
Geometry
- Grade
- 100.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 21.6 m
- From
- 19.5 m
- To
- 41.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 19.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 20-01:19.5-41.1
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Kate Silver Resource
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- low
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Skyline Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2020-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a moderate silver grade over a significant length, confirming mineralization at the Kate Silver Resource, but it is not new information and true width is unknown.
Positive factors
- Moderate silver grade
- Significant intercept length
- Confirms mineralization
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“100.6”
Context: 21.6
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document explicitly states that intervals are core-length and true widths are not known.
Evidence · text
“Note: Intervals reported above are core-length intervals; true widths are not known.”
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This intercept is from a 2020 drill campaign and is being re-released in this document.
Evidence · table
“20-01”
Context: 21.6
20-01Kate Silver Resource · silverGrade: 197.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 20-01
- Project
- Kate Silver Resource
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_co
- Reported Region
- usa_co
- Ticker
- VML
Geometry
- Grade
- 197.8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.7 m
- From
- 19.5 m
- To
- 22.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 19.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 20-01:19.5-22.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Kate Silver Resource
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- low
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Skyline Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2020-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical sub-interval shows a moderate silver grade, indicating mineralization within the broader intercept, but it is not new information and true width is unknown.
Positive factors
- Moderate silver grade sub-interval
- Confirms mineralization within broader zone
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
- Exact depth not specified
Evidence · table
“197.8 g/t”
Context: 2.7 m
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document explicitly states that intervals are core-length and true widths are not known.
Evidence · text
“Note: Intervals reported above are core-length intervals; true widths are not known.”
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This intercept is from a 2020 drill campaign and is being re-released in this document.
Evidence · table
“20-01”
Context: 2.7 m
20-02Kate Silver Resource · silverGrade: 64.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 20-02
- Project
- Kate Silver Resource
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_co
- Reported Region
- usa_co
- Ticker
- VML
Geometry
- Grade
- 64.9
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 10.1 m
- From
- 15.5 m
- To
- 25.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 15.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 20-02:15.5-25.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Kate Silver Resource
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- low
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Skyline Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2020-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a weak silver grade over a good length, confirming mineralization at the Kate Silver Resource, but it is not new information and true width is unknown.
Positive factors
- Weak silver grade
- Good intercept length
- Confirms mineralization
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“64.9”
Context: 10.1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document explicitly states that intervals are core-length and true widths are not known.
Evidence · text
“Note: Intervals reported above are core-length intervals; true widths are not known.”
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This intercept is from a 2020 drill campaign and is being re-released in this document.
Evidence · table
“20-02”
Context: 10.1
20-02Kate Silver Resource · silverGrade: 93.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 20-02
- Project
- Kate Silver Resource
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_co
- Reported Region
- usa_co
- Ticker
- VML
Geometry
- Grade
- 93.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 15.5 m
- To
- 19.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 15.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 20-02:15.5-19.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Kate Silver Resource
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- low
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Skyline Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2020-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical sub-interval shows a moderate silver grade, indicating mineralization within the broader intercept, but it is not new information and true width is unknown.
Positive factors
- Moderate silver grade sub-interval
- Confirms mineralization within broader zone
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
- Exact depth not specified
Evidence · table
“93.1 g/t”
Context: 4.0 m
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document explicitly states that intervals are core-length and true widths are not known.
Evidence · text
“Note: Intervals reported above are core-length intervals; true widths are not known.”
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This intercept is from a 2020 drill campaign and is being re-released in this document.
Evidence · table
“20-02”
Context: 4.0 m
20-03Kate Silver Resource · silverGrade: 703.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 14.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 20-03
- Project
- Kate Silver Resource
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_co
- Reported Region
- usa_co
- Ticker
- VML
Geometry
- Grade
- 703.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 14.9 m
- From
- 15.1 m
- To
- 30 m
- Intercept Depth
- 15.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 20-03:15.1-30
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Kate Silver Resource
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- low
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Skyline Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2020-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows an exceptional silver grade over a significant length, confirming high-grade mineralization at the Kate Silver Resource, but it is not new information and true width is unknown.
Positive factors
- Exceptional silver grade
- Significant intercept length
- Confirms high-grade mineralization
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“703.6”
Context: 14.9
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Reason: The silver grade of 703.6 g/t is above the exceptional threshold of 500 g/t for silver.
Evidence · table
“703.6”
Context: 14.9
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document explicitly states that intervals are core-length and true widths are not known.
Evidence · text
“Note: Intervals reported above are core-length intervals; true widths are not known.”
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This intercept is from a 2020 drill campaign and is being re-released in this document.
Evidence · table
“20-03”
Context: 14.9
20-03Kate Silver Resource · silverGrade: 3280Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 20-03
- Project
- Kate Silver Resource
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_co
- Reported Region
- usa_co
- Ticker
- VML
Geometry
- Grade
- 3280
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 15.1 m
- To
- 16.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 15.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 20-03:15.1-16.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Kate Silver Resource
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- low
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Skyline Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2020-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical sub-interval shows an extremely high-grade silver concentration, indicating bonanza-grade mineralization within the broader intercept, but it is not new information and true width is unknown.
Positive factors
- Extremely high-grade silver sub-interval
- Confirms bonanza mineralization within broader zone
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
- Exact depth not specified
Evidence · table
“3280 g/t”
Context: 1.5 m
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Reason: The silver grade of 3280 g/t is significantly above the exceptional threshold of 500 g/t for silver.
Evidence · table
“3280 g/t”
Context: 1.5 m
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document explicitly states that intervals are core-length and true widths are not known.
Evidence · text
“Note: Intervals reported above are core-length intervals; true widths are not known.”
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This intercept is from a 2020 drill campaign and is being re-released in this document.
Evidence · table
“20-03”
Context: 1.5 m
20-05Kate Silver Resource · silverGrade: 102.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 16.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 20-05
- Project
- Kate Silver Resource
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_co
- Reported Region
- usa_co
- Ticker
- VML
Geometry
- Grade
- 102.8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 16.8 m
- From
- 15.5 m
- To
- 32.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 15.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 20-05:15.5-32.3
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Kate Silver Resource
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- low
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Skyline Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2020-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a moderate silver grade over a significant length, confirming mineralization at the Kate Silver Resource, but it is not new information and true width is unknown.
Positive factors
- Moderate silver grade
- Significant intercept length
- Confirms mineralization
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“102.8”
Context: 16.8
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document explicitly states that intervals are core-length and true widths are not known.
Evidence · text
“Note: Intervals reported above are core-length intervals; true widths are not known.”
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This intercept is from a 2020 drill campaign and is being re-released in this document.
Evidence · table
“20-05”
Context: 16.8
20-05Kate Silver Resource · silverGrade: 273.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 20-05
- Project
- Kate Silver Resource
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_co
- Reported Region
- usa_co
- Ticker
- VML
Geometry
- Grade
- 273.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 15.5 m
- To
- 18.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 15.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 20-05:15.5-18.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Kate Silver Resource
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- low
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Skyline Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2020-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical sub-interval shows a strong silver grade, indicating high-grade mineralization within the broader intercept, but it is not new information and true width is unknown.
Positive factors
- Strong silver grade sub-interval
- Confirms high-grade mineralization within broader zone
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
- Exact depth not specified
Evidence · table
“273.5 g/t”
Context: 3.0 m
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document explicitly states that intervals are core-length and true widths are not known.
Evidence · text
“Note: Intervals reported above are core-length intervals; true widths are not known.”
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This intercept is from a 2020 drill campaign and is being re-released in this document.
Evidence · table
“20-05”
Context: 3.0 m
20-09Kate Silver Resource · silverGrade: 88.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 20-09
- Project
- Kate Silver Resource
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_co
- Reported Region
- usa_co
- Ticker
- VML
Geometry
- Grade
- 88.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.1 m
- From
- 45.7 m
- To
- 51.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 45.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 20-09:45.7-51.8
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Kate Silver Resource
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- low
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Skyline Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2020-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a weak silver grade over a moderate length, confirming mineralization at the Kate Silver Resource, but it is not new information and true width is unknown.
Positive factors
- Weak silver grade
- Moderate intercept length
- Confirms mineralization
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“88.6”
Context: 6.1
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document explicitly states that intervals are core-length and true widths are not known.
Evidence · text
“Note: Intervals reported above are core-length intervals; true widths are not known.”
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This intercept is from a 2020 drill campaign and is being re-released in this document.
Evidence · table
“20-09”
Context: 6.1
20-09Kate Silver Resource · silverGrade: 281Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 20-09
- Project
- Kate Silver Resource
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_co
- Reported Region
- usa_co
- Ticker
- VML
Geometry
- Grade
- 281
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 45.7 m
- To
- 47.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 45.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 20-09:45.7-47.2
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Kate Silver Resource
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- low
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Skyline Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2020-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical sub-interval shows a strong silver grade, indicating high-grade mineralization within the broader intercept, but it is not new information and true width is unknown.
Positive factors
- Strong silver grade sub-interval
- Confirms high-grade mineralization within broader zone
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
- Exact depth not specified
Evidence · table
“281.0 g/t”
Context: 1.5 m
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document explicitly states that intervals are core-length and true widths are not known.
Evidence · text
“Note: Intervals reported above are core-length intervals; true widths are not known.”
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This intercept is from a 2020 drill campaign and is being re-released in this document.
Evidence · table
“20-09”
Context: 1.5 m
20-10Kate Silver Resource · silverGrade: 55Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 19.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 20-10
- Project
- Kate Silver Resource
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_co
- Reported Region
- usa_co
- Ticker
- VML
Geometry
- Grade
- 55
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 19.5 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 19.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 20-10:0-19.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Kate Silver Resource
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- low
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Skyline Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2020-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a weak silver grade over a significant length, confirming mineralization at the Kate Silver Resource, but it is not new information and true width is unknown.
Positive factors
- Weak silver grade
- Significant intercept length
- Confirms mineralization
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“55”
Context: 19.5
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document explicitly states that intervals are core-length and true widths are not known.
Evidence · text
“Note: Intervals reported above are core-length intervals; true widths are not known.”
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This intercept is from a 2020 drill campaign and is being re-released in this document.
Evidence · table
“20-10”
Context: 19.5
20-10Kate Silver Resource · silverGrade: 169Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 20-10
- Project
- Kate Silver Resource
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_co
- Reported Region
- usa_co
- Ticker
- VML
Geometry
- Grade
- 169
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 1.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 20-10:0-1.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Kate Silver Resource
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- low
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Skyline Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2020-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical sub-interval shows a moderate silver grade, indicating mineralization within the broader intercept, but it is not new information and true width is unknown.
Positive factors
- Moderate silver grade sub-interval
- Confirms mineralization within broader zone
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
- Exact depth not specified
Evidence · table
“169.0 g/t”
Context: 1.5 m
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document explicitly states that intervals are core-length and true widths are not known.
Evidence · text
“Note: Intervals reported above are core-length intervals; true widths are not known.”
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This intercept is from a 2020 drill campaign and is being re-released in this document.
Evidence · table
“20-10”
Context: 1.5 m
21-01Kate Silver Resource · silverGrade: 147.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 18.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 21-01
- Project
- Kate Silver Resource
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_co
- Reported Region
- usa_co
- Ticker
- VML
Geometry
- Grade
- 147.6
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 18.6 m
- From
- 11 m
- To
- 29.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 11 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 21-01:11-29.6
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Kate Silver Resource
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- low
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Skyline Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2021-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a moderate silver grade over a significant length, confirming mineralization at the Kate Silver Resource, but it is not new information and true width is unknown.
Positive factors
- Moderate silver grade
- Significant intercept length
- Confirms mineralization
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
Evidence · table
“147.6”
Context: 18.6
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document explicitly states that intervals are core-length and true widths are not known.
Evidence · text
“Note: Intervals reported above are core-length intervals; true widths are not known.”
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This intercept is from a 2021 drill campaign and is being re-released in this document.
Evidence · table
“21-01”
Context: 18.6
21-01Kate Silver Resource · silverGrade: 1010Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 21-01
- Project
- Kate Silver Resource
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- usa_co
- Reported Region
- usa_co
- Ticker
- VML
Geometry
- Grade
- 1010
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 11 m
- To
- 12.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 11 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 21-01:11-12.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Kate Silver Resource
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- low
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- Skyline Labs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2021-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-06T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical sub-interval shows an exceptional silver grade, indicating bonanza-grade mineralization within the broader intercept, but it is not new information and true width is unknown.
Positive factors
- Exceptional silver grade sub-interval
- Confirms bonanza mineralization within broader zone
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
- Exact depth not specified
Evidence · table
“1010 g/t”
Context: 1.5 m
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Reason: The silver grade of 1010 g/t is above the exceptional threshold of 500 g/t for silver.
Evidence · table
“1010 g/t”
Context: 1.5 m
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document explicitly states that intervals are core-length and true widths are not known.
Evidence · text
“Note: Intervals reported above are core-length intervals; true widths are not known.”
Stale Data Re-releaseRejected · negative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Reason: This intercept is from a 2021 drill campaign and is being re-released in this document.
Evidence · table
“21-01”
Context: 1.5 m
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.