Visionary Outlines Regional Exploration Opportunity on Newly Expanded ~30,000 Hectare Land Package at Pt. Leamington, Central Newfoundland
Original announcement by tmx on
- Company
- Visionary Copper and Gold Mines Inc.
- Ticker
- VCG
- Exchange
- TSX
- Region
- Newfoundland
- Primary commodity
- Copper
- Secondary commodities
- Gold, Zinc, Silver, Lead
- Document categories
- Drill results, Other
- Extracted
- 2026-09-19 03:08:32 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Visionary Copper and Gold Mines Inc. has expanded its Pt. Leamington Project in Newfoundland to approximately 30,000 hectares. The expansion includes the historic Lewis Lake area, which contains multiple untested geophysical targets and historical drill results suggestive of a large VMS deposit.
Reasoning: The company has significantly expanded its regional footprint in a known VMS district, providing a large platform for exploration, though much of the value is based on historical data that requires modern verification.
Positive factors
- Significant land package expansion to 30,000 hectares
- High-priority untested geophysical targets identified
- Historical drilling confirmed permissive VMS environment
Negative factors
- Historical data has not been verified by the current operator
Facts used in scoring: 13
Classification and evidence
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: The expansion focuses on the Lewis Lake area adjacent to the existing Pt. Leamington VMS deposit.
Evidence · text
“covering the historic "Lewis Lake" area immediately east of the Pt. Leamington Deposit”
Step-Out Extensionpositive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Why it applies: The expansion covers a 30,000 hectare land package including adjacent ground to the existing project.
Evidence · text
“expanded its land package at its 100% owned Pt. Leamington Project... to nearly 30,000 hectares”
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 13. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (13)
LL2000-01Pt. Leamington · copperGrade: 480Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LL2000-01
- Project
- Pt. Leamington
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_nl
- Reported Region
- canada_nl
- Ticker
- VCG
Geometry
- Grade
- 480
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 93.2 m
- To
- 93.7 m
- Hole Depth
- 152 m
- Intercept Depth
- 93.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LL2000-01:93.2-93.7
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2001-04-17T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical low-grade copper intercept.
Evidence · text
“best interval of 0.50m of 480 ppm Cu”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Between 1999 and early 2001, Billiton/Rubicon completed (2001 Rubicon-Billiton Assessment Report, Appendix II - Lewis La"
LL2000-01Pt. Leamington · zincGrade: 460Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 0.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LL2000-01
- Project
- Pt. Leamington
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_nl
- Reported Region
- canada_nl
- Ticker
- VCG
Geometry
- Grade
- 460
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 93.2 m
- To
- 93.7 m
- Hole Depth
- 152 m
- Intercept Depth
- 93.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LL2000-01:93.2-93.7
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2001-04-17T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical low-grade zinc intercept.
Evidence · text
“460 ppm Zn at 93.20-93.70m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Between 1999 and early 2001, Billiton/Rubicon completed (2001 Rubicon-Billiton Assessment Report, Appendix II - Lewis La"
LL2000-02Pt. Leamington · goldGrade: 0.185Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LL2000-02
- Project
- Pt. Leamington
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_nl
- Reported Region
- canada_nl
- Ticker
- VCG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.185
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.4 m
- From
- 392.6 m
- To
- 394 m
- Hole Depth
- 490.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 392.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LL2000-02:392.6-394
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2001-04-17T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical low-grade gold intercept.
Evidence · text
“1.40m at 185 ppb Au (0.185 g/t Au)”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Between 1999 and early 2001, Billiton/Rubicon completed (2001 Rubicon-Billiton Assessment Report, Appendix II - Lewis La"
LL2000-02Pt. Leamington · silverGrade: 0.84Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LL2000-02
- Project
- Pt. Leamington
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_nl
- Reported Region
- canada_nl
- Ticker
- VCG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.84
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.4 m
- From
- 392.6 m
- To
- 394 m
- Hole Depth
- 490.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 392.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LL2000-02:392.6-394
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2001-04-17T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical low-grade silver intercept.
Evidence · text
“0.84 g/t Ag”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Between 1999 and early 2001, Billiton/Rubicon completed (2001 Rubicon-Billiton Assessment Report, Appendix II - Lewis La"
LL2000-02Pt. Leamington · copperGrade: 178Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LL2000-02
- Project
- Pt. Leamington
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_nl
- Reported Region
- canada_nl
- Ticker
- VCG
Geometry
- Grade
- 178
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.4 m
- From
- 392.6 m
- To
- 394 m
- Hole Depth
- 490.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 392.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LL2000-02:392.6-394
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2001-04-17T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical low-grade copper intercept.
Evidence · text
“178 ppm Cu”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Between 1999 and early 2001, Billiton/Rubicon completed (2001 Rubicon-Billiton Assessment Report, Appendix II - Lewis La"
LL2000-02Pt. Leamington · zincGrade: 459Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 1.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LL2000-02
- Project
- Pt. Leamington
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_nl
- Reported Region
- canada_nl
- Ticker
- VCG
Geometry
- Grade
- 459
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 1.4 m
- From
- 392.6 m
- To
- 394 m
- Hole Depth
- 490.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 392.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LL2000-02:392.6-394
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2001-04-17T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical low-grade zinc intercept.
Evidence · text
“459 ppm Zn”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Between 1999 and early 2001, Billiton/Rubicon completed (2001 Rubicon-Billiton Assessment Report, Appendix II - Lewis La"
LL2000-03Pt. Leamington · copperGrade: 147Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 2.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LL2000-03
- Project
- Pt. Leamington
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_nl
- Reported Region
- canada_nl
- Ticker
- VCG
Geometry
- Grade
- 147
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 2.9 m
- From
- 163.4 m
- To
- 166.3 m
- Hole Depth
- 212 m
- Intercept Depth
- 163.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LL2000-03:163.4-166.3
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2001-04-17T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical low-grade copper intercept.
Evidence · text
“2.90m at 147 ppm Cu”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Between 1999 and early 2001, Billiton/Rubicon completed (2001 Rubicon-Billiton Assessment Report, Appendix II - Lewis La"
LL2000-03Pt. Leamington · zincGrade: 249Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 2.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LL2000-03
- Project
- Pt. Leamington
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_nl
- Reported Region
- canada_nl
- Ticker
- VCG
Geometry
- Grade
- 249
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 2.9 m
- From
- 163.4 m
- To
- 166.3 m
- Hole Depth
- 212 m
- Intercept Depth
- 163.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LL2000-03:163.4-166.3
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2001-04-17T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical low-grade zinc intercept.
Evidence · text
“249 ppm Zn at 163.40-166.30 m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Between 1999 and early 2001, Billiton/Rubicon completed (2001 Rubicon-Billiton Assessment Report, Appendix II - Lewis La"
LL2000-05Pt. Leamington · silverGrade: 0.78Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.45 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LL2000-05
- Project
- Pt. Leamington
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_nl
- Reported Region
- canada_nl
- Ticker
- VCG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.78
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.45 m
- From
- 34.75 m
- To
- 38.2 m
- Hole Depth
- 100 m
- Intercept Depth
- 34.75 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LL2000-05:34.75-38.2
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2001-04-17T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical low-grade silver intercept.
Evidence · text
“3.45m at 0.78 g/t Ag”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Between 1999 and early 2001, Billiton/Rubicon completed (2001 Rubicon-Billiton Assessment Report, Appendix II - Lewis La"
LL2000-05Pt. Leamington · copperGrade: 137Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3.45 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LL2000-05
- Project
- Pt. Leamington
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_nl
- Reported Region
- canada_nl
- Ticker
- VCG
Geometry
- Grade
- 137
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 3.45 m
- From
- 34.75 m
- To
- 38.2 m
- Hole Depth
- 100 m
- Intercept Depth
- 34.75 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LL2000-05:34.75-38.2
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2001-04-17T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical low-grade copper intercept.
Evidence · text
“137 ppm Cu”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Between 1999 and early 2001, Billiton/Rubicon completed (2001 Rubicon-Billiton Assessment Report, Appendix II - Lewis La"
LL2000-05Pt. Leamington · zincGrade: 390Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3.45 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LL2000-05
- Project
- Pt. Leamington
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_nl
- Reported Region
- canada_nl
- Ticker
- VCG
Geometry
- Grade
- 390
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 3.45 m
- From
- 34.75 m
- To
- 38.2 m
- Hole Depth
- 100 m
- Intercept Depth
- 34.75 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LL2000-05:34.75-38.2
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2001-04-17T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical low-grade zinc intercept.
Evidence · text
“390 ppm Zn”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Between 1999 and early 2001, Billiton/Rubicon completed (2001 Rubicon-Billiton Assessment Report, Appendix II - Lewis La"
LL2000-09Pt. Leamington · copperGrade: 258Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 2.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LL2000-09
- Project
- Pt. Leamington
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_nl
- Reported Region
- canada_nl
- Ticker
- VCG
Geometry
- Grade
- 258
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 2.4 m
- From
- 70.5 m
- To
- 72.9 m
- Hole Depth
- 143.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 70.5 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- LL2000-09:70.5-72.9
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2001-04-17T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical low-grade copper intercept.
Evidence · text
“2.40m at 258 ppm Cu”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Between 1999 and early 2001, Billiton/Rubicon completed (2001 Rubicon-Billiton Assessment Report, Appendix II - Lewis La"
LL2001-15Pt. Leamington · copperGrade: 341Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- LL2001-15
- Project
- Pt. Leamington
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_nl
- Reported Region
- canada_nl
- Ticker
- VCG
Geometry
- Grade
- 341
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 3.9 m
- Hole Depth
- 133.3 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, check_assays
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2001-04-17T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-05-21T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical low-grade copper intercept.
Evidence · text
“3.90 m of 341 ppm Cu”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Between 1999 and early 2001, Billiton/Rubicon completed (2001 Rubicon-Billiton Assessment Report, Appendix II - Lewis La"
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.