# Visit Engineer Gold Mines at the Vancouver Resource Investment Conference Booth \#210 Canonical Atlas analysis: https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/visit-engineer-gold-mines-at-the-vancouver-resource-investment-conference-booth--730636fd-313a-45c4-a636-1d1a00dfae52 Original source: https://money.tmx.com/en/quote/EAU/news/6357017912330111/visit-engineer-gold-mines-at-the-vancouver-resource-investment-conference-booth- Publisher: tmx Original announcement: 2023-01-11T16:51:00.000Z Analysis by Minestarters Atlas Atlas analysis published: Unknown date Atlas analysis updated: Unknown date - Company: Engineer Gold Mines Ltd. - Ticker: EAU - Exchange: TSX - Region: British Columbia - Primary commodity: Unavailable - Secondary commodities: None reported - Document categories: Resource update, Other - Extracted: 2026-09-17 19:48:25 UTC Narrative sentiment: 0.00 · Neutral ## Minestarters Atlas summary Engineer Gold Mines Ltd. announces its participation in the Vancouver Resource Investment Conference \(VRIC\) on January 29-30, 2023. The release provides a summary of historical resource estimates for the Engineer Gold Mine, Tag, and Wann River properties, while explicitly noting that these historical figures should not be relied upon. Reasoning: The document is a corporate announcement regarding conference attendance that includes a summary of historical resource estimates for the company's properties. It contains no new drill results or updated resource estimates. - Positive factor: Conference participation announcement - Negative factor: Re-release of historical resource data - Negative factor: Explicit warning that historical resources should not be relied upon Facts used in scoring: 6 ## Classification and evidence **Stale Estimate** Polarity: negative Story-specific tag Definition: Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding. Why it applies: The resource estimates for Engineer Gold Mine and Tag are historical \(2011/2018 and 2009 respectively\) and the company explicitly states they should not be relied upon. Evidence · text > The Company has done no further work to confirm this historical resource and should not be relied upon. **Historical Estimate Only** Polarity: negative Story-specific tag Definition: Estimate pre-dates or does not comply with current JORC/NI 43-101 standards — requires verification drilling. Why it applies: The document restates historical resource estimates for Engineer Gold Mine and Tag that pre-date current CIM guidelines. Evidence · text > Note that this resource estimate predates the 2019 CIM Guidelines for NI 43-101 reporting. ## Extracted facts Stored fact records: 6. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record. ## Resource Estimates (6) ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/visit-engineer-gold-mines-at-the-vancouver-resource-investment-conference-booth--730636fd-313a-45c4-a636-1d1a00dfae52#fact-resource-facts-0) Engineer Gold Mine · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Engineer Gold Mine - Commodity: gold - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: EAU #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Resource group id: resource:b3cebd3be709e99ab65c #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 41000 - Grade: 19 - Grade Unit: g/t - Contained Metal: 25000 - Contained Unit: oz - Cutoff Grade: 5 - Cutoff Unit: g/t Au #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2018-01-01T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2023-01-11T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Restatement of a 2018 historical resource. - Negative factor: Historical data - Negative factor: Not reliable per company Evidence · text > Inferred Mineral Resource of 41,000 t grading 19.0 g/t gold for 25,000 oz contained gold. #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **Stale Estimate** Polarity: negative Definition: Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding. Why it applies: effective date is 5.0 years before this release ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/visit-engineer-gold-mines-at-the-vancouver-resource-investment-conference-booth--730636fd-313a-45c4-a636-1d1a00dfae52#fact-resource-facts-1) Engineer Gold Mine · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Engineer Gold Mine - Commodity: gold - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: EAU #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Resource group id: resource:5250f5e4aedb6a364f66 #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 14000 - Grade: 52.5 - Grade Unit: g/t - Contained Metal: 23600 - Contained Unit: oz - Cutoff Grade: 25 - Cutoff Unit: g/t gold #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2018-01-01T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2023-01-11T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Restatement of a 2018 historical high-grade core. - Negative factor: Historical data - Negative factor: Not reliable per company Evidence · text > higher-grade core of 14,000t grading 52.5 g/t gold \(25 g/t gold Cut-Off\) containing 23,600 oz contained gold. #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison. Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated **Stale Estimate** Polarity: negative Definition: Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding. Why it applies: effective date is 5.0 years before this release ### indicated [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/visit-engineer-gold-mines-at-the-vancouver-resource-investment-conference-booth--730636fd-313a-45c4-a636-1d1a00dfae52#fact-resource-facts-2) Tag · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Tag - Commodity: gold - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: EAU #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Resource group id: resource:9ef65dc2b8a89fa84fd6 #### Resource Data - Category: indicated - Tonnes: 250000 - Grade: 2.97 - Grade Unit: g/t #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2009-12-29T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2023-01-11T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Restatement of 2009 historical resource. - Negative factor: Historical data - Negative factor: Not reliable per company Evidence · text > 250,000 tonnes of Indicated material at average grades of 2.97 g/t Au #### Tags used in scoring **Indicated Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves. Why it applies: category is "indicated" **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Stale Estimate** Polarity: negative Definition: Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding. Why it applies: effective date is 13.0 years before this release ### indicated [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/visit-engineer-gold-mines-at-the-vancouver-resource-investment-conference-booth--730636fd-313a-45c4-a636-1d1a00dfae52#fact-resource-facts-3) Tag · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Tag - Commodity: silver - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: EAU #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Resource group id: resource:9ef65dc2b8a89fa84fd6 #### Resource Data - Category: indicated - Tonnes: 250000 - Grade: 12.09 - Grade Unit: g/t #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2009-12-29T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2023-01-11T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Restatement of 2009 historical silver grade. - Negative factor: Historical data - Negative factor: Not reliable per company Evidence · text > and 12.09 g/t Ag #### Tags used in scoring **Indicated Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves. Why it applies: category is "indicated" **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Stale Estimate** Polarity: negative Definition: Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding. Why it applies: effective date is 13.0 years before this release ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/visit-engineer-gold-mines-at-the-vancouver-resource-investment-conference-booth--730636fd-313a-45c4-a636-1d1a00dfae52#fact-resource-facts-4) Tag · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Tag - Commodity: gold - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: EAU #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Resource group id: resource:6487fa3b727a7cedb280 #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 400000 - Grade: 2.98 - Grade Unit: g/t #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2009-12-29T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2023-01-11T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Restatement of 2009 historical resource. - Negative factor: Historical data - Negative factor: Not reliable per company Evidence · text > an Inferred resource of 400,000 tonnes at average grades of 2.98 g/t Au #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Stale Estimate** Polarity: negative Definition: Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding. Why it applies: effective date is 13.0 years before this release ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/visit-engineer-gold-mines-at-the-vancouver-resource-investment-conference-booth--730636fd-313a-45c4-a636-1d1a00dfae52#fact-resource-facts-5) Tag · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Tag - Commodity: silver - Region: canada\_bc - Reported Region: British Columbia - Ticker: EAU #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Resource group id: resource:6487fa3b727a7cedb280 #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 400000 - Grade: 9.91 - Grade Unit: g/t #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2009-12-29T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2023-01-11T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Restatement of 2009 historical silver grade. - Negative factor: Historical data - Negative factor: Not reliable per company Evidence · text > and 9.91 g/t Ag. #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Stale Estimate** Polarity: negative Definition: Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding. Why it applies: effective date is 13.0 years before this release ## How Atlas produces this analysis Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.