Vizsla Silver Corp.: Exhibit 99.1 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com

Original announcement by research on

Company
Vizsla Silver Corp.
Ticker
VZLA
Exchange
TSX
Region
Sinaloa, Mexico
Primary commodity
Silver
Secondary commodities
Gold, Lead, Zinc
Document categories
Resource update, Metallurgy
Extracted
2026-11-08 15:42:18 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published:

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

This annual information form for Vizsla Silver is dominated by an updated mineral resource estimate for the Panuco-Copala Property in Sinaloa, Mexico. It also summarizes recent metallurgical test work on the project’s three main deposits and states the proposed underground mining and processing approach. The document includes substantial corporate history and financing activity, but the resource update is the main technical event.

Reasoning: The document is mainly an annual information form, but its substantive technical content centers on an updated NI 43-101 mineral resource estimate for Panuco-Copala and supporting metallurgical work. The resource update is material, while the metallurgy section is supportive rather than the primary event.

Positive factors

  • updated Mineral Resource Estimate reported for the Panuco-Copala Property
  • combined Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources are estimated at 12.96 Mt
  • NI 43-101 compliant updated MRE with named qualified persons
  • metallurgical test work completed on the three main deposits

Negative factors

  • resource remains predominantly underground-oriented and early-stage
  • base case cut-off grade is high at 150 g/t AgEq
  • document is an annual information form with substantial historical and corporate background

Rubric flags

  • metallurgy extraction completeness — The metallurgy section contains broader test-work detail than can be faithfully represented in the limited fact set here; a fuller extraction would include each deposit/domain and each reported recovery condition.

Facts used in scoring: 22

Classification and evidence

NI 43 101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: The technical report states that the updated MRE complies with NI 43-101 disclosure requirements.

Evidence · text

“The reporting of the updated MRE complies with all disclosure requirements for Mineral Resources set out in NI 43-101.”

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: The report names multiple independent Qualified Persons responsible for the technical report and updated MRE.

Evidence · text

“The Authors are independent Qualified Persons as defined by NI 43-101 and are responsible for all sections of this report.”

Cut Off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: The resource statement specifies a base case cut-off grade of 150 g/t AgEq.

Evidence · text

“Mineral resources are reported at a base case cut-off grade of 150 g/t AgEq.”

High Recoverypositive

Recovery at or above the exceptional band for the commodity and processing route.

Why it applies: The base-case resource assumptions cite 93% Ag recovery and 90% Au recovery for the AgEq calculation.

Evidence · text

“considers metal recoveries of 93% for Ag, 90% for Au, 94% for Pb and 94% for Zn.”

Mill Routeneutral

Processing via mill or concentrator (CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation).

Why it applies: The process design includes crushing, grinding, cyanide leaching and flotation circuits, which are mill-based routes.

Evidence · text

“The process design is based on processing mineralized material from the Panuco deposits, through crushing, grinding cyanide leaching”

Goldneutral · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Why it applies: The project is explicitly described as a silver-gold project and the resource table reports gold grades and ounces.

Evidence · text

“Panuco silver-gold project”

Single Domain Onlynegative

Testing limited to one composite or domain — representativeness not established.

Why it applies: only one composite was tested

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 22. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Resource Estimates (20)

indicatedPanuco-Copala Property · silverTonnes: 12960000Grade: 307Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 222.4Contained Unit: moz ageqView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Panuco-Copala Property
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
Sinaloa, Mexico
Ticker
VZLA

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2024-09-09T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Allan Armitage, Ben Eggers, Henri Gouin, Peter Mehrfert, James Millard, Jonathan Cooper, Scott Elfen
Resource group id
resource:feb87eb29e9cda67fc80
Deposit or zone
Panuco Project
Mining method
underground
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
12960000
Grade
307
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
222.4
Contained Unit
moz ageq
Cutoff Grade
150
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2024-09-09

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
534
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Lab

Laboratory
SGS

Location

Loc. Confidence
inferred

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Reasoning: This is the headline indicated resource row for the updated Panuco Project MRE. The estimate is sizable, compliant, and sufficiently transparent on cut-off and AgEq assumptions, but the underground context keeps the grade interpretation conservative.

Positive factors

  • combined Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources are estimated at 12.96 Mt
  • updated MRE complies with NI 43-101
  • base case cut-off grade and AgEq assumptions are disclosed

Negative factors

  • project is envisioned for underground mining methods
  • contained metal is reported as AgEq rather than metal-specific contained ounces in this row

Evidence · table

“12.96 Mt grading 307 g/t silver”

Context: Combined Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut Off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43 101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 2.2 years before this release

indicatedPanuco-Copala Property · goldTonnes: 12960000Grade: 2.49Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 822Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Panuco-Copala Property
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
Sinaloa, Mexico
Ticker
VZLA

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2024-09-09T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Allan Armitage, Ben Eggers, Henri Gouin, Peter Mehrfert, James Millard, Jonathan Cooper, Scott Elfen
Resource group id
resource:feb87eb29e9cda67fc80
Deposit or zone
Panuco Project
Mining method
underground
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
12960000
Grade
2.49
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
822
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
150
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2024-09-09

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
534
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Lab

Laboratory
SGS

Location

Loc. Confidence
inferred

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Reasoning: The indicated gold resource is sizeable and disclosed alongside contained ounces, supporting the scale of the Panuco estimate. Its significance is strong but still shaped by the underground, polymetallic nature of the deposit.

Positive factors

  • gold grade is explicitly reported in the updated MRE
  • contained gold ounces are stated for the indicated category
  • NI 43-101 compliance and QP sign-off are disclosed

Negative factors

  • resource is framed for underground mining
  • this is part of a broader polymetallic resource rather than a standalone gold estimate

Evidence · table

“2.49 g/t gold”

Context: Combined Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut Off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43 101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 2.2 years before this release

indicatedPanuco-Copala Property · leadTonnes: 12960000Grade: 0.27Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 69.7Contained Unit: mlbsView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Panuco-Copala Property
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
Sinaloa, Mexico
Ticker
VZLA

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2024-09-09T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Allan Armitage, Ben Eggers, Henri Gouin, Peter Mehrfert, James Millard, Jonathan Cooper, Scott Elfen
Resource group id
resource:feb87eb29e9cda67fc80
Deposit or zone
Panuco Project
Mining method
underground
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
12960000
Grade
0.27
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
69.7
Contained Unit
mlbs
Cutoff Grade
150
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2024-09-09

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
534
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Lab

Laboratory
SGS

Location

Loc. Confidence
inferred

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Reasoning: The lead component is material in the context of the Panuco polymetallic estimate and is transparently reported. It is secondary to silver and gold, so the investor impact is supportive rather than primary.

Positive factors

  • lead grade and contained pounds are explicitly disclosed
  • supports the polymetallic value of the resource

Negative factors

  • lead is a byproduct commodity rather than the main economic driver
  • underground mining context limits direct comparability to open-pit resources

Evidence · table

“0.27% lead”

Context: Combined Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut Off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43 101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 2.2 years before this release

indicatedPanuco-Copala Property · zincTonnes: 12960000Grade: 0.85Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 225.6Contained Unit: mlbsView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Panuco-Copala Property
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
Sinaloa, Mexico
Ticker
VZLA

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2024-09-09T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Allan Armitage, Ben Eggers, Henri Gouin, Peter Mehrfert, James Millard, Jonathan Cooper, Scott Elfen
Resource group id
resource:feb87eb29e9cda67fc80
Deposit or zone
Panuco Project
Mining method
underground
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
12960000
Grade
0.85
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
225.6
Contained Unit
mlbs
Cutoff Grade
150
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2024-09-09

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
534
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Lab

Laboratory
SGS

Location

Loc. Confidence
inferred

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Reasoning: The zinc component is clearly disclosed and adds value to the polymetallic estimate. It is a secondary metal relative to the silver-gold focus, so the impact is supportive.

Positive factors

  • zinc grade and contained pounds are explicitly disclosed
  • supports the polymetallic resource base

Negative factors

  • zinc is a secondary commodity in the project summary
  • resource is framed for underground mining

Evidence · table

“0.85% zinc”

Context: Combined Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut Off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43 101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 2.2 years before this release

inferredPanuco-Copala Property · silverTonnes: 10500000Grade: 219Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 73.6Contained Unit: mozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Panuco-Copala Property
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
Sinaloa, Mexico
Ticker
VZLA

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2024-09-09T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Allan Armitage, Ben Eggers, Henri Gouin, Peter Mehrfert, James Millard, Jonathan Cooper, Scott Elfen
Resource group id
resource:b8559522bcee265a1b5f
Deposit or zone
Panuco Project
Mining method
underground
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
10500000
Grade
219
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
73.6
Contained Unit
moz
Cutoff Grade
150
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2024-09-09

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
412
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Lab

Laboratory
SGS

Location

Loc. Confidence
inferred

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Reasoning: The inferred silver resource adds scale to the project, but it is lower confidence than the indicated portion. The numbers are clear and material, yet still subject to the usual limitations of inferred classification.

Positive factors

  • inferred silver resource is explicitly reported
  • contained silver ounces are stated

Negative factors

  • inferred category is lower confidence than indicated
  • resource remains underground-oriented

Evidence · table

“10.5 Mt grading 219 g/t silver”

Context: Inferred Mineral Resources

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut Off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43 101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 2.2 years before this release

inferredPanuco-Copala Property · goldTonnes: 10500000Grade: 1.96Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 660Contained Unit: kozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Panuco-Copala Property
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
Sinaloa, Mexico
Ticker
VZLA

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2024-09-09T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Allan Armitage, Ben Eggers, Henri Gouin, Peter Mehrfert, James Millard, Jonathan Cooper, Scott Elfen
Resource group id
resource:b8559522bcee265a1b5f
Deposit or zone
Panuco Project
Mining method
underground
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
10500000
Grade
1.96
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
660
Contained Unit
koz
Cutoff Grade
150
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2024-09-09

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
412
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Lab

Laboratory
SGS

Location

Loc. Confidence
inferred

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Reasoning: The inferred gold resource is economically relevant and clearly reported. It is meaningful, but the classification keeps confidence below the indicated resource rows.

Positive factors

  • inferred gold resource is explicitly reported
  • contained gold ounces are disclosed

Negative factors

  • inferred classification reduces confidence
  • underground mining assumption applies

Evidence · table

“1.96 g/t gold”

Context: Inferred Mineral Resources

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut Off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43 101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 2.2 years before this release

inferredPanuco-Copala Property · leadTonnes: 10500000Grade: 0.3Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 31.2Contained Unit: ktView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Panuco-Copala Property
Commodity
lead
Region
mexico
Reported Region
Sinaloa, Mexico
Ticker
VZLA

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2024-09-09T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Allan Armitage, Ben Eggers, Henri Gouin, Peter Mehrfert, James Millard, Jonathan Cooper, Scott Elfen
Resource group id
resource:b8559522bcee265a1b5f
Deposit or zone
Panuco Project
Mining method
underground
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
10500000
Grade
0.3
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
31.2
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
150
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2024-09-09

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
412
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Lab

Laboratory
SGS

Location

Loc. Confidence
inferred

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Reasoning: The inferred lead figure is a useful part of the polymetallic inventory, but it is secondary and lower-confidence. It supports the project's overall metal endowment more than it drives the investment case.

Positive factors

  • lead is explicitly carried in the inferred estimate
  • contained lead tonnes are reported

Negative factors

  • lead is a secondary commodity
  • inferred category carries lower geological confidence

Evidence · table

“0.30% lead”

Context: Inferred Mineral Resources

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut Off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43 101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 2.2 years before this release

inferredPanuco-Copala Property · zincTonnes: 10500000Grade: 1.01Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 106.2Contained Unit: ktView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Panuco-Copala Property
Commodity
zinc
Region
mexico
Reported Region
Sinaloa, Mexico
Ticker
VZLA

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2024-09-09T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Allan Armitage, Ben Eggers, Henri Gouin, Peter Mehrfert, James Millard, Jonathan Cooper, Scott Elfen
Resource group id
resource:b8559522bcee265a1b5f
Deposit or zone
Panuco Project
Mining method
underground
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
10500000
Grade
1.01
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
106.2
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
150
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2024-09-09

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
412
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Lab

Laboratory
SGS

Location

Loc. Confidence
inferred

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Reasoning: The inferred zinc component is clearly stated and contributes to the broader resource picture. It is supportive but not the core value driver.

Positive factors

  • zinc grade and contained tonnes are reported
  • adds to the polymetallic metal inventory

Negative factors

  • secondary commodity relative to silver and gold
  • inferred category limits confidence

Evidence · table

“1.01% zinc”

Context: Inferred Mineral Resources

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut Off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43 101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 2.2 years before this release

measuredPanuco · silverTonnes: 12960000Grade: 307Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Panuco
Commodity
silver
Ticker
VZLA

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2024-09-09T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
Resource group id
resource:9ffa947be300f896af18
Mining method
underground
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
measured
Tonnes
12960000
Grade
307
Grade Unit
g/t
Cutoff Grade
150
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
534
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.

Negative factors

  • Fact expanded from resource table columns (model omitted this commodity).

Evidence · table

“307”

Context: 12.96

Tags used in scoring

Measured Resourcepositive

Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "measured"

Cut Off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

NI 43 101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

measuredPanuco · goldTonnes: 12960000Grade: 2.49Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Panuco
Commodity
gold
Ticker
VZLA

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2024-09-09T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
Resource group id
resource:9ffa947be300f896af18
Mining method
underground
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
measured
Tonnes
12960000
Grade
2.49
Grade Unit
g/t
Cutoff Grade
150
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
534
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.

Negative factors

  • Fact expanded from resource table columns (model omitted this commodity).

Evidence · table

“2.49”

Context: 12.96

Tags used in scoring

Measured Resourcepositive

Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "measured"

Cut Off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

NI 43 101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

measuredPanuco · leadTonnes: 12960000Grade: 0.27Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Panuco
Commodity
lead
Ticker
VZLA

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2024-09-09T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
Resource group id
resource:9ffa947be300f896af18
Mining method
underground
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
measured
Tonnes
12960000
Grade
0.27
Grade Unit
%
Cutoff Grade
150
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
534
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.

Negative factors

  • Fact expanded from resource table columns (model omitted this commodity).

Evidence · table

“0.27”

Context: 12.96

Tags used in scoring

Measured Resourcepositive

Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "measured"

Cut Off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

NI 43 101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

measuredPanuco · zincTonnes: 12960000Grade: 0.85Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Panuco
Commodity
zinc
Ticker
VZLA

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2024-09-09T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
Resource group id
resource:9ffa947be300f896af18
Mining method
underground
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
measured
Tonnes
12960000
Grade
0.85
Grade Unit
%
Cutoff Grade
150
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
534
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.

Negative factors

  • Fact expanded from resource table columns (model omitted this commodity).

Evidence · table

“0.85”

Context: 12.96

Tags used in scoring

Measured Resourcepositive

Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "measured"

Cut Off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

NI 43 101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

indicatedPanuco · silverTonnes: 12960000Grade: 307Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Panuco
Commodity
silver
Ticker
VZLA

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2024-09-09T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
Resource group id
resource:fc0fae7eefee2792a2db
Mining method
underground
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
12960000
Grade
307
Grade Unit
g/t
Cutoff Grade
150
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
534
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.

Negative factors

  • Fact expanded from resource table columns (model omitted this commodity).

Evidence · table

“307”

Context: 12.96

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut Off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

NI 43 101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

indicatedPanuco · goldTonnes: 12960000Grade: 2.49Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Panuco
Commodity
gold
Ticker
VZLA

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2024-09-09T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
Resource group id
resource:fc0fae7eefee2792a2db
Mining method
underground
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
12960000
Grade
2.49
Grade Unit
g/t
Cutoff Grade
150
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
534
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.

Negative factors

  • Fact expanded from resource table columns (model omitted this commodity).

Evidence · table

“2.49”

Context: 12.96

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut Off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

NI 43 101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

indicatedPanuco · leadTonnes: 12960000Grade: 0.27Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Panuco
Commodity
lead
Ticker
VZLA

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2024-09-09T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
Resource group id
resource:fc0fae7eefee2792a2db
Mining method
underground
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
12960000
Grade
0.27
Grade Unit
%
Cutoff Grade
150
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
534
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.

Negative factors

  • Fact expanded from resource table columns (model omitted this commodity).

Evidence · table

“0.27”

Context: 12.96

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut Off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

NI 43 101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

indicatedPanuco · zincTonnes: 12960000Grade: 0.85Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Panuco
Commodity
zinc
Ticker
VZLA

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2024-09-09T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
Resource group id
resource:fc0fae7eefee2792a2db
Mining method
underground
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
12960000
Grade
0.85
Grade Unit
%
Cutoff Grade
150
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
534
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.

Negative factors

  • Fact expanded from resource table columns (model omitted this commodity).

Evidence · table

“0.85”

Context: 12.96

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut Off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

NI 43 101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

inferredPanuco · silverTonnes: 10500000Grade: 219Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Panuco
Commodity
silver
Ticker
VZLA

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2024-09-09T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
Resource group id
resource:a8cd8c8dc322a74a278b
Mining method
underground
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
10500000
Grade
219
Grade Unit
g/t
Cutoff Grade
150
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
412
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.

Negative factors

  • Fact expanded from resource table columns (model omitted this commodity).

Evidence · table

“219”

Context: 10.5

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut Off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

NI 43 101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

inferredPanuco · goldTonnes: 10500000Grade: 1.96Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Panuco
Commodity
gold
Ticker
VZLA

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2024-09-09T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
Resource group id
resource:a8cd8c8dc322a74a278b
Mining method
underground
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
10500000
Grade
1.96
Grade Unit
g/t
Cutoff Grade
150
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
412
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.

Negative factors

  • Fact expanded from resource table columns (model omitted this commodity).

Evidence · table

“1.96”

Context: 10.5

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut Off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

NI 43 101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

inferredPanuco · leadTonnes: 10500000Grade: 0.3Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Panuco
Commodity
lead
Ticker
VZLA

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2024-09-09T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
Resource group id
resource:a8cd8c8dc322a74a278b
Mining method
underground
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
10500000
Grade
0.3
Grade Unit
%
Cutoff Grade
150
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
412
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.

Negative factors

  • Fact expanded from resource table columns (model omitted this commodity).

Evidence · table

“0.30”

Context: 10.5

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut Off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

NI 43 101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

inferredPanuco · zincTonnes: 10500000Grade: 1.01Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Panuco
Commodity
zinc
Ticker
VZLA

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Effective date
2024-09-09T00:00:00.000Z
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
Resource group id
resource:a8cd8c8dc322a74a278b
Mining method
underground
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
10500000
Grade
1.01
Grade Unit
%
Cutoff Grade
150
Cutoff Unit
g/t AgEq

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
412
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Reasoning: Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.

Negative factors

  • Fact expanded from resource table columns (model omitted this commodity).

Evidence · table

“1.01”

Context: 10.5

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut Off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

NI 43 101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

Metallurgical Results (2)

flotationPanuco-Copala Property · silverRecovery: 80 %Head Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Panuco-Copala Property
Commodity
silver
Region
mexico
Reported Region
Sinaloa, Mexico
Ticker
VZLA

Test Work

Program Status
detailed
Test Type
flotation
Processing Route
bulk sulphide flotation
Sample
Napoleon master composite

Recovery

Recovery
80 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test
Head Grade Unit
g/t
Conc. Grade
50
Conc. Grade Unit
g/t

Lab

Laboratory
ALS Metallurgy
Consultant
Ausenco

Location

Loc. Confidence
inferred

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Reasoning: This extract captures the Napoleon flotation context, but the document does not state a silver recovery percentage in this sentence. It is useful supporting metallurgy, though the direct numeric result is for gold concentrate grade rather than silver recovery.

Positive factors

  • metallurgical test work completed on the Napoleon deposit
  • bulk sulphide flotation produced concentrate with stated grade

Negative factors

  • the passage is a broad program summary rather than a single quantified silver recovery result
  • no explicit silver recovery percentage is stated for this specific fact

Evidence · text

“bulk sulphide concentrates containing 50 to 60 g/t gold could be generated”

Tags used in scoring

Mill Routeneutral

Processing via mill or concentrator (CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation).

Why it applies: processing_route matches the flotation signal

flotationPanuco-Copala Property · goldRecovery: 80 %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Panuco-Copala Property
Commodity
gold
Region
mexico
Reported Region
Sinaloa, Mexico
Ticker
VZLA

Test Work

Program Status
detailed
Test Type
flotation
Processing Route
bulk sulphide flotation
Sample
Napoleon master composite

Recovery

Recovery
80 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test
Conc. Grade
50
Conc. Grade Unit
g/t

Lab

Laboratory
ALS Metallurgy
Consultant
Ausenco

Location

Loc. Confidence
inferred

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Reasoning: The sentence clearly supports a positive gold flotation result via concentrate grade, but it is not a full recovery statement. It adds technical support to the process design rather than independently underwriting it.

Positive factors

  • gold concentrate grade is explicitly reported
  • test work indicates viable bulk sulphide concentration

Negative factors

  • the sentence does not provide a standalone gold recovery number for this circuit
  • open-circuit cleaner results are not yet confirmed in this passage

Evidence · text

“bulk sulphide concentrates containing 50 to 60 g/t gold could be generated”

Tags used in scoring

Mill Routeneutral

Processing via mill or concentrator (CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation).

Why it applies: processing_route matches the flotation signal

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.