# Vizsla Silver Corp.: Exhibit 99.1 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com

Canonical Atlas analysis: https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/vizsla-silver-corp-exhibit-99-1-filed-by-newsfilecorp-com--345b4e76-acc6-4888-a8d6-803a111c50c0

Original source: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1796073/000106299324020653/exhibit99-1.htm

Publisher: research

Original announcement: Unknown date

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published: 2026-11-03T10:48:33.853Z

Atlas analysis updated: 2026-11-03T10:48:33.853Z

- Company: Vizsla Silver Corp.

- Ticker: VZLA

- Exchange: TSX

- Region: Sinaloa, Mexico

- Primary commodity: Silver

- Secondary commodities: Gold, Lead, Zinc

- Document categories: Other, Drill results, Resource update

- Extracted: 2026-11-03 10:48:33 UTC

Narrative sentiment: 0.28 · Bullish

## Minestarters Atlas summary

Vizsla Silver announced the start of its fully funded and fully permitted test mining and bulk sample program at the Panuco silver-gold project in Sinaloa, Mexico. The release also says the company is continuing a 10,000 metre discovery drill campaign and has awarded a ground HLEM survey contract. Historical resource and study figures are mentioned for context, but no new assays or updated resource numbers are disclosed.

Reasoning: The dominant current event is the start of test mining and bulk sampling, with exploration and historical resource context secondary. The announcement is operationally positive and de-risking, but it contains no new assays or new resource numbers.

- Positive factor: Commencement of a fully funded and fully permitted test mining and bulk sample program at Panuco.

- Positive factor: Program is intended to reconcile geotechnical conditions and resource models ahead of full-scale development.

- Positive factor: Exploration update includes a 10,000 metre discovery-based drill campaign and a ground HLEM survey.

- Negative factor: No new drill assay results or resource update figures are reported in this document.

- Negative factor: The resource estimate figures are historical references to a prior announcement dated January 8, 2024.

- Negative factor: The feasibility study and updated mineral resource estimate are still pending.

- Rubric flag: drill\_results only for current assays/intervals — This document has no new drill intercept grades or widths; keep it classified as other with operational and historical facts only.

Facts used in scoring: 10

## Classification and evidence

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: The release states ALS and SGS sample preparation/analysis procedures, ISO 9001 and ISO/IEC 17025 certification, and inserted control samples.

Evidence · text

> Quality Assurance / Quality Control

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: A Qualified Person is named and states they reviewed and approved the technical and scientific content.

Evidence · text

> Jesus Velador, Ph.D. MMSA QP

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: The resource figures are explicitly referenced to a prior announcement dated January 8, 2024 rather than presented as new results.

Evidence · text

> On January 8, 2024, the Company announced an updated mineral resource estimate for Panuco

**Infill Drilling**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The exploration update says the program is focused on locating new centres of high-grade mineralization outboard of the current PEA mine plan, but the main disclosed activity here is development/test mining rather than resource conversion drilling.

Evidence · text

> resource block models and geotechnical models

## Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 3. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

## Drill Results (3)

### Fact 1

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/vizsla-silver-corp-exhibit-99-1-filed-by-newsfilecorp-com--345b4e76-acc6-4888-a8d6-803a111c50c0#fact-drill-facts-0)

Panuco · silver

Historical result

Needs review: drill\_no\_hole\_id

#### Identity

- Project: Panuco
- Commodity: silver
- Region: mexico
- Reported Region: mexico
- Ticker: VZLA

#### Classification

- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: Panuco:historical-resource

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: drill\_no\_hole\_id
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 2024-01-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The document restates a prior indicated mineral resource in AgEq for context rather than announcing a new estimate.

- Positive factor: Historical resource reference is explicitly tied to NI 43-101 disclosure and QP review.

- Positive factor: The release states indicated and inferred AgEq resources for Panuco.

- Negative factor: This is a restatement of a prior resource announcement dated January 8, 2024.

- Negative factor: No effective date, tonnes, or grade are given here.

- Negative factor: Contained metal is quoted in AgEq only, without a new estimate table in this document.

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

### Fact 2

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/vizsla-silver-corp-exhibit-99-1-filed-by-newsfilecorp-com--345b4e76-acc6-4888-a8d6-803a111c50c0#fact-drill-facts-1)

Panuco · silver

Historical result

Needs review: drill\_no\_hole\_id

#### Identity

- Project: Panuco
- Commodity: silver
- Region: mexico
- Reported Region: mexico
- Ticker: VZLA

#### Classification

- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: Panuco:historical-resource

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: drill\_no\_hole\_id
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 2024-01-08T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The document restates a prior inferred mineral resource in AgEq for context rather than announcing a new estimate.

- Positive factor: Historical resource reference is explicitly tied to NI 43-101 disclosure and QP review.

- Positive factor: The release states inferred AgEq resources for Panuco.

- Negative factor: This is a restatement of a prior resource announcement dated January 8, 2024.

- Negative factor: No effective date, tonnes, or grade are given here.

- Negative factor: Contained metal is quoted in AgEq only, without a new estimate table in this document.

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

### Fact 3

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/vizsla-silver-corp-exhibit-99-1-filed-by-newsfilecorp-com--345b4e76-acc6-4888-a8d6-803a111c50c0#fact-drill-facts-3)

Panuco · silver

Needs review: drill\_no\_hole\_id

#### Identity

- Project: Panuco
- Commodity: silver
- Region: mexico
- Reported Region: mexico
- Ticker: VZLA

#### Geometry

- Intercept: 1071 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: epithermal
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Mining Method: underground

#### Location

- Location: Copala
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: drill\_no\_hole\_id
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

Reasoning: The development metres quantify the underground program scope and support the de-risking narrative, but they are not mineral intercept results.

- Positive factor: The underground scope includes approximately 1,071 meters of ramp and lateral development.

- Positive factor: This supports the test mining and bulk sampling program.

- Negative factor: No assay results are reported.

- Negative factor: This is planned/underway development metres, not drill intercept metres.

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

## How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.
