# With Step-Out Drilling Continuing, Radisson Demonstrates Meaningful Resource Growth at O'Brien with an Updated Mineral Resource Estimate

Canonical Atlas analysis: https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/with-step-out-drilling-continuing-radisson-demonstrates-meaningful-resource-grow--dd11438b-8568-4713-9881-1ac1ff8f1841

Original source: https://money.tmx.com/en/quote/RDS/news/6366371186948655/with-step-out-drilling-continuing-radisson-demonstrates-meaningful-resource-grow

Publisher: tmx

Original announcement: 2026-03-02T11:30:00.000Z

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published: Unknown date

Atlas analysis updated: Unknown date

- Company: Radisson Mining Resources Inc.

- Ticker: RDS

- Exchange: TSX

- Region: Québec

- Primary commodity: Gold

- Secondary commodities: None reported

- Document categories: Resource update

- Extracted: 2026-09-16 18:54:04 UTC

Narrative sentiment: 0.80 · Bullish

## Minestarters Atlas summary

Radisson Mining Resources has released an updated Mineral Resource Estimate for the O'Brien Gold Project, showing significant growth in Inferred resources \(82% increase\) due to successful step-out drilling. While Indicated resource tonnage grew by 58%, the average grade decreased by 32% due to a refined capping strategy and lower cut-off grade.

Reasoning: The update demonstrates substantial resource expansion, particularly in the Inferred category, driven by successful step-out drilling, though the Indicated grade has been lowered by the new capping and cut-off parameters.

- Positive factor: Significant Inferred resource growth \(82%\) from step-out drilling

- Positive factor: Indicated resource tonnage increase \(58%\)

- Positive factor: High-grade vein deposit profile \(5.59 g/t Au Indicated\)

- Positive factor: Clear expansion potential via ongoing 140ktm drill program

- Negative factor: Grade decline in Indicated category \(32%\) due to lower cut-off and capping strategy

Facts used in scoring: 2

## Classification and evidence

**Inferred Resource**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: A significant portion of the resource \(10.37 Mt\) is classified as Inferred.

Evidence · text

> Inferred Mineral Resources... 1.69 Moz \(10.37 Mt at 5.08 g/t Au\)

**Indicated Resource**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: The estimate includes a substantial Indicated component of 3.49 Mt.

Evidence · text

> Indicated Mineral Resources... 0.63 Moz \(3.49 Mt at 5.59 g/t Au\)

**Resource Update**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: The document reports an updated Mineral Resource Estimate compared to previous versions.

Evidence · text

> demonstrates meaningful resource growth at O'Brien with an updated Mineral Resource Estimate

**Tonnage Growth**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Tonnage increase reaching the strong tier vs prior estimate, with grade maintained or improved.

Why it applies: Indicated tonnage increased by 58% and Inferred by 55% vs prior estimates.

Evidence · text

> increase in tonnes of 58% to 3.49 Mt... increase in tonnage of 55% to 10.37 Mt

**Grade Decline**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Average grade fell below the red-flag bound vs prior estimate — deposit economics worsening. May indicate high-grading in early drilling.

Why it applies: Indicated grade fell by 32% compared to the May 2025 estimate.

Evidence · text

> decrease in grade of 32% to 5.59 g/t Au

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: Qualified Persons \(Richard Nieminen and Luke Evans\) are named and responsible for the MRE.

Evidence · text

> prepared under the supervision of Mr. Richard Nieminen, P.Geo., \(QC\)... Mr. Luke Evans, M.Sc., P.Eng., ing., of SLR Consulting \(Canada\) Ltd., is the Qualified Person responsible

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: The cut-off grade of 2.2 g/t Au is explicitly stated.

Evidence · text

> Mineral resources are reported above a cut-off grade of 2.2 g/t Au

## Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 2. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

## Resource Estimates (2)

### indicated

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/with-step-out-drilling-continuing-radisson-demonstrates-meaningful-resource-grow--dd11438b-8568-4713-9881-1ac1ff8f1841#fact-resource-facts-0)

O'Brien Gold Project · gold

#### Identity

- Project: O'Brien Gold Project
- Commodity: gold
- Region: canada\_qc
- Reported Region: Québec
- Ticker: RDS

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Effective date: 2026-01-31T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Richard Nieminen, Luke Evans
- Resource group id: resource:1d4633f15b6440178170
- Mining method: underground
- Ownership percent: 100 %

#### Resource Data

- Category: indicated
- Tonnes: 3493000
- Grade: 5.59
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Contained Metal: 628
- Contained Unit: koz au
- Cutoff Grade: 2.2
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Au

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2026-01-31

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Indicated resource shows strong tonnage growth but lower grade due to updated estimation parameters.

- Positive factor: Significant tonnage increase

- Negative factor: Grade decline vs prior estimate

Evidence · table

> 5.59

Context: 3,493

#### Tags used in scoring

**Indicated Resource**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**Resource Update**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

### inferred

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-extractions.minestarters.com/news/with-step-out-drilling-continuing-radisson-demonstrates-meaningful-resource-grow--dd11438b-8568-4713-9881-1ac1ff8f1841#fact-resource-facts-1)

O'Brien Gold Project · gold

#### Identity

- Project: O'Brien Gold Project
- Commodity: gold
- Region: canada\_qc
- Reported Region: Québec
- Ticker: RDS

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Effective date: 2026-01-31T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Richard Nieminen, Luke Evans
- Resource group id: resource:b6728084b9ed457c2a62
- Mining method: underground
- Ownership percent: 100 %

#### Resource Data

- Category: inferred
- Tonnes: 10368000
- Grade: 5.08
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Contained Metal: 1692
- Contained Unit: koz au
- Cutoff Grade: 2.2
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Au

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2026-01-31

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-03-02T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Inferred resource shows exceptional growth in both tonnage and contained metal, validating the step-out drilling program.

- Positive factor: Massive tonnage and metal growth

- Positive factor: Successful step-out drilling

Evidence · table

> 5.08

Context: 10,368

#### Tags used in scoring

**Inferred Resource**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**Resource Update**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

## How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.
